I'm currently playing chrono cross for which I had pretty low expectations seeing as many people seem to think it's flawed for some reason, and I have been truely surprised.  This game is classic, up there with the original, and really the only flaw that i can see is that there aren't too many posible combos in combat.

I'm already 20-25 hours in and I'm loving it.  So please tell me, what is it that people generally seem to dislike in this game?

It's not trigger.

thats clever

I never knew what the hell was going on in that game, for one thing. Chrono Trigger featured a tight story and a well rounded cast of a few. Chrono Cross featured a "WTF" story and 10,000 forgetable playable characters. Didn't CHA figure that ou!?. Well won't CHA keep on playing (that's my Korcha impression. He says "CHA" a lot for no reason.).!

20-25 hours, eh? Has the big plot twist happened yet? And you aren't pissed?

A quote from my signature last year:

"Ignore those who say Chrono Cross and Final Fantasy VII did not live up to their predecessors. It is not their opinion they speak, but their hate for these outstanding sequels leaving Nintendo."

Chrono Cross is one of my favorite games ever. It's a classic (ask nen-suer how much I used to defend that game back in 2008).

If you like Chrono Cross, raise your hand.

......sigh.

I loved Chrono Trigger but Chrono Cross is a better game in every way.

I can't even remember with what party I finished the game with... Did finish it with the "rainbow" end battle that's all I can remember..



I think one of them was called Lucca.. and the other was Kid?

So Cross had better music than this?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSgKzZor7k0

Lynx was a better villain than Magus (and Lavos)?

Kid was better developed than Marle or Lucca?

The color based battle system was better than Triggers dual and triple techniques?

Traveling between demensions by...fainting is better than traveling through time in a time machine?