By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - (Video) GoldenEye 007: Reloaded

Bristow9091 said:
Why do people think $60 is outrageous, isn't that the price for a new game over in US? And don't say it's not a new game because it was out on Wii beforehand, it's still a new game for PS360 owners...

OT: Looks good, I'll be picking it up for PS3 sometime, not sure when but I will, lol.


Thats still ten bucks MORE than what Wii owners paid LAST year. IMHO, its worth it if you have never played, but still thats crazy



Around the Network

Hmm. I already have the better Perfect Dark HD and Halo. Why would I pay this amount for this?



selnor said:
Hmm. I already have the better Perfect Dark HD and Halo. Why would I pay this amount for this?


Because this game is better??? But really, this is an insane price. And im a huge fan of this game



oniyide said:
selnor said:
Hmm. I already have the better Perfect Dark HD and Halo. Why would I pay this amount for this?


Because this game is better??? But really, this is an insane price. And im a huge fan of this game

I was a huge Goldeneye fan, but when I bought Perfect Dark on the N64 it was better in every way. It had better multiplayer maps, better story and better level design. It was Goldeneye on steroids. So the fact i can buy for a rediculous price a game that after playing on Wii is inferior to Perfect Dark still is rediculous. 

 

The name Goldeneye 007 imo is misused and hurts the old Goldeneye image in the way this whole remake of this game has been handled. It's not bad, but it's not great. To be honest Perfect Dark HD remake is better online than Goldeneye 007 Wii. So this game gives me no excitement whatsoever.

Unfortunately we will never get a decent Perfect Dark 2. Because 1 thing Microsoft did that I hated was waste all Rares amazing First Party titles. 

Microsoft could quite easily destroy Sonys first party lineup if they had used Rare in the right way.

In the PS1 day Conker, Banjo, Jet Force Gemini, Blast Corps, Killer Instinct and Perfect Dark were all First Party Franchises that Rare had that many people and reviewers considered better than anything Sony had. And Microsoft bought them at a good time. If only they had known that they would be 2nd place this gen, they may just have bolstered the talent at Rare. 

Still, thats by the by.



selnor said:
oniyide said:
selnor said:
Hmm. I already have the better Perfect Dark HD and Halo. Why would I pay this amount for this?


Because this game is better??? But really, this is an insane price. And im a huge fan of this game

I was a huge Goldeneye fan, but when I bought Perfect Dark on the N64 it was better in every way. It had better multiplayer maps, better story and better level design. It was Goldeneye on steroids. So the fact i can buy for a rediculous price a game that after playing on Wii is inferior to Perfect Dark still is rediculous. 

 

1 The name Goldeneye 007 imo is misused and hurts the old Goldeneye image in the way this whole remake of this game has been handled. It's not bad, but it's not great. To be honest Perfect Dark HD remake is better online than Goldeneye 007 Wii. So this game gives me no excitement whatsoever.

2 Unfortunately we will never get a decent Perfect Dark 2. Because 1 thing Microsoft did that I hated was waste all Rares amazing First Party titles. 

3 Microsoft could quite easily destroy Sonys first party lineup if they had used Rare in the right way.

4 In the PS1 day Conker, Banjo, Jet Force Gemini, Blast Corps, Killer Instinct and Perfect Dark were all First Party Franchises that Rare had that many people and reviewers considered better than anything Sony had. And Microsoft bought them at a good time. If only they had known that they would be 2nd place this gen, they may just have bolstered the talent at Rare. 

Still, thats by the by.

1 dont really agree with this, yeah Rouge Agent was lame, but i liked the Wii game for what it was. But seeing as i have not played the Perfect Dark HD game, i cannot say which is better. But to be fair its not like Wii has the best online structure anyway, not fair to compare it to probably the best online out there.

2. Didnt they have a Perfect Dark game at launch?? Since people act like it doesnt exist im just gonna assume it wasnt that good, or Halo 3 overshadowed it. But yeah they wasted Rare

3 probably

4 im not gonna lie those Rare games were great, except Killer instint, i hated that game. But lets be real here it didnt really help N64 did it? It still got the crap kicked out of it by PS1

 

 



Around the Network
Bristow9091 said:
Why do people think $60 is outrageous, isn't that the price for a new game over in US? And don't say it's not a new game because it was out on Wii beforehand, it's still a new game for PS360 owners...

OT: Looks good, I'll be picking it up for PS3 sometime, not sure when but I will, lol.

LoL that argument always comes up in late ports discussions and guess what - i think there weren't even single case where market responded well to that strategy.



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB

Looks mostly the same as the Wii one, but that's a good thing because the Wii one is great.

Now more people will get the chance to play a great game!



Zlejedi said:
Bristow9091 said:
Why do people think $60 is outrageous, isn't that the price for a new game over in US? And don't say it's not a new game because it was out on Wii beforehand, it's still a new game for PS360 owners...

OT: Looks good, I'll be picking it up for PS3 sometime, not sure when but I will, lol.

LoL that argument always comes up in late ports discussions and guess what - i think there weren't even single case where market responded well to that strategy.

someone gets it



Thechalkblock said:
Looks mostly the same as the Wii one, but that's a good thing because the Wii one is great.

Now more people will get the chance to play a great game!

its so nice to see someone glad that a good game is going multiplat so more people can enjoy it. Instead of this whole "acti beytrayed us" nonsense with no concrete argument to back it up



Legally, I wonder why Nintendo is allowing this.

As a game player, I hope they fix the bugs found in the Wii version. It's annoying to do well in a match just to faze through the ground and die.



Pixel Art can be fun.