By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Rank this game--Wii Play!!

Tagged games:

 

How much do you Play?

I Play ALL the time! 3 11.54%
 
I let others Play for me. 0 0%
 
Wii Play together! 4 15.38%
 
I refuse to Play! 10 38.46%
 
What is this?!? I don't even.... 6 23.08%
 
See results you boring person. 3 11.54%
 
Total:26
yo_john117 on 12 August 2011
d21lewis said:
trasharmdsister12 said:
d21 and Rol are making game ranking discussion popular again... either that or it has gone so far out of fashion that only these two still do it.


This post just reminded me of the vow I made a long time ago to never participate in these threads!!  Oh well.

I see my new thread title fooled you! >:D



Around the Network
brendude13 on 12 August 2011
Machina said:
brendude13 said:
Machina said:

1.0

The 1 is for tanks, which was pretty cool, though playing all the other atrocious games to get there was not.

Half of the games are boring All but one of the games is truly boring. Half are broken concepts from the get-go that I cannot believe were ever green lit (Find Mii, Pose Mii, Fishing). Those that have sound concepts either have broken controls (Billiards, Table Tennis(!!!), Laser Hockey), or are so dull and basic as to not be worth playing anyway (Shooting Range, Charge).

Tanks is the last game you unlock, so in order to get to the only game which is worth playing you have to complete all of the others. Billiards and Table Tennis are so broken that we just rushed to get them over with as soon as we possibly could (easier said than done in the case of Billiards, alas), and I didn't revisist any of the other games... ever.

I've not really done a very good job of articulating what an awful waste of space this game is, but my vote is deadly serious; it's a compilation of crappy, awful, barely playable games. Even though at the time it was the only way to get my hands on an extra Wiimote, I still regret buying it, and I hate myself for adding to those enormous sales figures because it doesn't deserve a single one of them.

Machina filled with rage?

This cannot be o.0

I was more enraged in the 'Rioting in London' thread. Wii Play is probably the worst game I've played this gen.

Same, I think this country has a very serious problem.

But it can't be THAT bad can it, especially for the price.



Jay520 on 12 August 2011

This has to be the fifth "best thread ever". I feel deceived.



yo_john117 on 12 August 2011
RolStoppable said:
yo_john117 said:
RolStoppable said:

You need to add 0.1 points to your score, otherwise it won't count.

Lol it doesn't work that way.

This is your ranking game and now you are telling me that you don't even understand your own rules?

It's basically a curve like this.

Ok look at the Linear side. Now think of the .1 as a high score, the 1.1 as a really low score and the blue/red curve how much effort you have to put into it.



yo_john117 on 13 August 2011
RolStoppable said:
yo_john117 said:
RolStoppable said:

This is your ranking game and now you are telling me that you don't even understand your own rules?

It's basically a curve like this.

Ok look at the Linear side. Now think of the .1 as a high score, the 1.1 as a really low score and the blue/red curve how much effort you have to put into it.

That's not what your rule is defined as though. What your rule actually says is that you don't have to put effort into as long as you score a game 5.1 or higher and that you only have to go in great detail, if you score a game 5.0 or lower. That's what it is and that's how everyone understands it. I mean, just look at KylieDog's posts in this thread.

That's how it's pretty much always been and that's how I have always counted up the threads. And I seriously thought everyone knew (especially since I haven't had a problem with it until this thread)

It's why Marco's scores didn't count even though they were 5.5

And now that I think about it its actually not a curve it's more like steps...3 steps to be exact.

Step 1: 7-10 (not much effort)

Step 2: 5-6.9 ( a decent amount of effort)

Step 3: 1-4.9 (a lot of effort)



Around the Network
yo_john117 on 13 August 2011
RolStoppable said:
yo_john117 said:

That's how it's pretty much always been and that's how I have always counted up the threads. And I seriously thought everyone knew (especially since I haven't had a problem with it until this thread)

It's why Marco's scores didn't count even though they were 5.5

And now that I think about it its actually not a curve it's more like steps...3 steps to be exact.

Step 1: 7-10 (not much effort)

Step 2: 5-6.9 ( a decent amount of effort)

Step 3: 1-4.9 (a lot of effort)

Marco's score didn't count, because we do not trust Marco regardless of the score he gives to any given game.

Back in the day I would have allowed stuff like this to happen. But everyone wanted me to be more fair so now I am an absolute hardass when it comes to this stuff.



Pyro as Bill on 13 August 2011

8.3 Amazon UK

7.3 Amazon US

Apart from Wii Sports, no other game at that time allowed a 2 yr old to enjoy all the games that we 'hardcore' gamers have played before. More replayability than any non-online enabled HD game.

Virtual Pool and Tanks, whilst dated, are still better games than the majority of tripe sloshed out this gen.

I'll give it an 8.

I suppose when you kids can buy games at less than 10% of the price we had to pay, inflation and hype adjusted, then replayability isn't a major factor any more.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Jay520 on 13 August 2011

Pyro as Bill said:

More replayability than any non-online enabled HD game.

I see what you did there. 



yo_john117 on 13 August 2011
KylieDog said:
Does this mean my score does not count? There is hardly any game to rate, is a small bunch of shovelware pretty much.

If you edit some more of your dislike for the game in your post then it will be counted.



kitler53 on 15 August 2011

..well, looks like my review won't count. i'd consider adding more depth to my review but for 2 reasons

1. doesn't look like we'll get 15 "counted" reviews anyways.
2. i'm not putting more effort into a review than nintendo put into the "game".