By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 32 - Harry Potter

For that matter I'd also like to know who you think is most likely town.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
lynch Heph

Have any reasoning behind your vote, or are you just piggybacking off of Wonk's reasoning?

I'll cut you some slack because I think there's a very good chance you're town, but the latter is generally looked at as scummy.(mafia-like) Futhermore, giving your own opinion on a situation is vital for allowing others to try to gauge your alignment.


don't know either person. i'm new and still trying to understand the formula

so why do you want to lynch heph?

his post seems suspicious, but i'm starting to question your post aswell.

Oh you are, are you?

Pray tell, what do you question about it, why is it suspicious? And then how about explaining why Hephs post is suspect?

If you're feeling generous, don't spare any details. Explain specifically why, and then, explain why it makes sense given the overall context, and then maybe outside factors. You don't have to give me all that explanation, but I'd like something more than the simple single sentences you've been providing so far.

oh and getting defencive are we. yea i see. that enough evidence right there. lynch proof.



Nobody wants to discuss John voting for himself?



Linkzmax said:
Nobody wants to discuss John voting for himself?



A newb giving up?



Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
OK so now i've finally read all (at work)
nothing to add on the remaing posts besides that i'm glad linkz understands my wonk point. To me that is the main info of the day, wonk's reaction (others might think the day's info is on me, that's beyond the point though ^^).

I'm also surprised by proff's calm... then again, he has realy changed his play in the past few months so it's not really inconsistant.

Unvote

Vote : JohnYo


tomorow will be the time to look at Wonk more closely.


funny how you say he understands a point then come and put something different in.

all he said of your point with me was he agreed I said the same point twice and that is true in the sence that I said it both in my vote and in responce to prof when he brough up a different point.

he also shoots down your point of me and prof, so I'm not sure what you really think he's validating.

I find it interesting how you went from calling prof intimidating to calm

I was agreeing that you said the same thing twice in a single post as Heph points out here. Read your own post again and explain how what's before the comma is different from what is after?

Where did I shoot down Heph's theory on you and prof? Here I admit that I can see the indirect connection between you two, I'm just not fully convinced you are both scum. Today I would be comfortable lynching you more than prof, to test the theory, if John didn't flat out give up. But if it were lylo,(lynch scum or lose) I would most likely be going with Heph instead. I'm glad today has been at least this active, as I feel there are a lot of leads to go off of, should John not be scum or not be the final scum.

I see Heph's point for prof being both intimidating and calm. They are not mutually exclusive. That being said, I don't think prof was intimidating; the "pro" talk is either honest townie opinion or scum WIFOM.(wine in front of me) The calmness seems to just be an evolution of prof. I do miss the in-your-face attitude sometimes, but more often than not it didn't turn out well for town.



Around the Network
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:

his post seems suspicious, but i'm starting to question your post aswell.

Oh you are, are you?

Pray tell, what do you question about it, why is it suspicious? And then how about explaining why Hephs post is suspect?

If you're feeling generous, don't spare any details. Explain specifically why, and then, explain why it makes sense given the overall context, and then maybe outside factors. You don't have to give me all that explanation, but I'd like something more than the simple single sentences you've been providing so far.

oh and getting defencive are we. yea i see. that enough evidence right there. lynch proof.

I like that you're starting to use some reasoning. Just a reminder though, it's easier on the host if you vote like "Vote: Example"



TadpoleJackson said:
Linkzmax said:
Nobody wants to discuss John voting for himself?



A newb giving up?

Hardly! More like a boss who can't be arsed! (as the british say it!)



Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:

his post seems suspicious, but i'm starting to question your post aswell.

Oh you are, are you?

Pray tell, what do you question about it, why is it suspicious? And then how about explaining why Hephs post is suspect?

If you're feeling generous, don't spare any details. Explain specifically why, and then, explain why it makes sense given the overall context, and then maybe outside factors. You don't have to give me all that explanation, but I'd like something more than the simple single sentences you've been providing so far.

oh and getting defencive are we. yea i see. that enough evidence right there. lynch proof.

I like that you're starting to use some reasoning. Just a reminder though, it's easier on the host if you vote like "Vote: Example"

thanxs?



Linkzmax said:
Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
OK so now i've finally read all (at work)
nothing to add on the remaing posts besides that i'm glad linkz understands my wonk point. To me that is the main info of the day, wonk's reaction (others might think the day's info is on me, that's beyond the point though ^^).

I'm also surprised by proff's calm... then again, he has realy changed his play in the past few months so it's not really inconsistant.

Unvote

Vote : JohnYo


tomorow will be the time to look at Wonk more closely.


funny how you say he understands a point then come and put something different in.

all he said of your point with me was he agreed I said the same point twice and that is true in the sence that I said it both in my vote and in responce to prof when he brough up a different point.

he also shoots down your point of me and prof, so I'm not sure what you really think he's validating.

I find it interesting how you went from calling prof intimidating to calm

I was agreeing that you said the same thing twice in a single post as Heph points out here. Read your own post again and explain how what's before the comma is different from what is after?

Where did I shoot down Heph's theory on you and prof? Here I admit that I can see the indirect connection between you two, I'm just not fully convinced you are both scum. Today I would be comfortable lynching you more than prof, to test the theory, if John didn't flat out give up. But if it were lylo,(lynch scum or lose) I would most likely be going with Heph instead. I'm glad today has been at least this active, as I feel there are a lot of leads to go off of, should John not be scum or not be the final scum.

I see Heph's point for prof being both intimidating and calm. They are not mutually exclusive. That being said, I don't think prof was intimidating; the "pro" talk is either honest townie opinion or scum WIFOM.(wine in front of me) The calmness seems to just be an evolution of prof. I do miss the in-your-face attitude sometimes, but more often than not it didn't turn out well for town.

I had misread hephs post as to be saying my point and profs were the same.

What I did wasn't just saying the same thing twice. Heph both said he was a hypocrite and the example. I pointed out them both, because both the admition and the example deserved attention and I though prof was missing it.

Shoot down may be strongly worded however you didn't agree and you said you could't imagine haveing 2 of the three of us pegged as scum.

Glad to see you agree he wasn't being intimidating. Have you ever seen prof calm and intimidating before? Although they dont have to be mutually exclusive I don't recall ever seeing it, from anyone especially him.



Linkzmax said:
Nobody wants to discuss John voting for himself?


what is there to say? that baal is busy and hasn't ended the day yet? I'd wish John  he'd have just stayed off and been modkilled so we could have had a different choice to lynch.