Wonktonodi said:
all he said of your point with me was he agreed I said the same point twice and that is true in the sence that I said it both in my vote and in responce to prof when he brough up a different point. he also shoots down your point of me and prof, so I'm not sure what you really think he's validating. I find it interesting how you went from calling prof intimidating to calm |
I was agreeing that you said the same thing twice in a single post as Heph points out here. Read your own post again and explain how what's before the comma is different from what is after?
Where did I shoot down Heph's theory on you and prof? Here I admit that I can see the indirect connection between you two, I'm just not fully convinced you are both scum. Today I would be comfortable lynching you more than prof, to test the theory, if John didn't flat out give up. But if it were lylo,(lynch scum or lose) I would most likely be going with Heph instead. I'm glad today has been at least this active, as I feel there are a lot of leads to go off of, should John not be scum or not be the final scum.
I see Heph's point for prof being both intimidating and calm. They are not mutually exclusive. That being said, I don't think prof was intimidating; the "pro" talk is either honest townie opinion or scum WIFOM.(wine in front of me) The calmness seems to just be an evolution of prof. I do miss the in-your-face attitude sometimes, but more often than not it didn't turn out well for town.
