By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wonktonodi on 24 August 2011
Edit Thread
Linkzmax said:
Wonktonodi said:
Hephaestos said:
OK so now i've finally read all (at work)
nothing to add on the remaing posts besides that i'm glad linkz understands my wonk point. To me that is the main info of the day, wonk's reaction (others might think the day's info is on me, that's beyond the point though ^^).

I'm also surprised by proff's calm... then again, he has realy changed his play in the past few months so it's not really inconsistant.

Unvote

Vote : JohnYo

tomorow will be the time to look at Wonk more closely.


funny how you say he understands a point then come and put something different in.

all he said of your point with me was he agreed I said the same point twice and that is true in the sence that I said it both in my vote and in responce to prof when he brough up a different point.

he also shoots down your point of me and prof, so I'm not sure what you really think he's validating.

I find it interesting how you went from calling prof intimidating to calm

I was agreeing that you said the same thing twice in a single post as Heph points out here. Read your own post again and explain how what's before the comma is different from what is after?

Where did I shoot down Heph's theory on you and prof? Here I admit that I can see the indirect connection between you two, I'm just not fully convinced you are both scum. Today I would be comfortable lynching you more than prof, to test the theory, if John didn't flat out give up. But if it were lylo,(lynch scum or lose) I would most likely be going with Heph instead. I'm glad today has been at least this active, as I feel there are a lot of leads to go off of, should John not be scum or not be the final scum.

I see Heph's point for prof being both intimidating and calm. They are not mutually exclusive. That being said, I don't think prof was intimidating; the "pro" talk is either honest townie opinion or scum WIFOM.(wine in front of me) The calmness seems to just be an evolution of prof. I do miss the in-your-face attitude sometimes, but more often than not it didn't turn out well for town.

I had misread hephs post as to be saying my point and profs were the same.

What I did wasn't just saying the same thing twice. Heph both said he was a hypocrite and the example. I pointed out them both, because both the admition and the example deserved attention and I though prof was missing it.

Shoot down may be strongly worded however you didn't agree and you said you could't imagine haveing 2 of the three of us pegged as scum.

Glad to see you agree he wasn't being intimidating. Have you ever seen prof calm and intimidating before? Although they dont have to be mutually exclusive I don't recall ever seeing it, from anyone especially him.