lay out for me the significant changes in design moving from the dsi to the 3ds and by that i'm talking about the design or appearance which would be related to... "looks like a slightly upgraded" imo it does look like a slightly upgraded 3ds

in terms of the psv its said to have power and visual capability that rivals the ps3 due to its smaller size which i can understand leads to this point "PlayStation Vita is, essentially, a mini-PS3 in your pocket" but i do agree that thats exaggeration

Hahaha, I'm so happy to be off the team these days... especially after reading through this thread...
When I do look over there, it's aggressive, baiting, and simply shallow/uninformed, which I don't remember being the case last year.

To people complaining about regurgitating news - most sites to that, and with varying results. Kotaku posts an article, then does Destructoid, then Joystiq, Siliconera, and such. Notice that the news topic within all of them is the same, but the writing is different, maybe the writer adds his opinion or a joke, or some good info about the game - that's not something I would call regurgitating news, and back in my day, it's the straight up news that brought the news section THE most hits, 2x-3x-4x times articles get now, even the most random games could get 1k+.

Now, I do admit to making a couple of baitful articles back when I was on the team, but mainly I was just posting news with my own twist - the ones that people liked, I even have saved in .htm files on my PC. It just makes me feel good. And heck, I was doing great - the best of all the writers back then. That is not necessarily a bad direction, and news had an encompassing audience on this site - not everybody visits many gaming sites but this one.

You simply bring people what they want, and you do it well. What's happening right now is... neither. I'd be really hard pressed if someone asked me to find an audience for "Sony is the next Nintendo" (that article still cracks me up).

please quote for me where the guy reffers to "processing power" he never even mentioned "processing" or "power" in that article...

he spoke of how things look thats all he said the 3ds and dsi are similar in terms of appearance and said that the psv can be seen as a portable ps3 which can be interpreted several ways for example it has similar aesthetics, game visuals look similar etc

however no i do not believe that the 3ds is only slighlty more powerful than the dsi although personally i havent seen anything on it so far that surpasses the best i've seen on the iphone or psp with the 3d off... but lol i must say though i'm seeing a rare side to nintendo gamers are you really trying to argue about power on a nintendo platform? i thought that didn't matter?

I'm honestly curious why people complain, I was fairly certain a lot of the articles in question were editorials, not news. The stuff about 3DS and PSV and a lot of the articles you guys are complaining about are in fact meant to be opinion. You can't have a wrong opinion.

Also, I frankly agree: the 3DS is just a prettier DSi, but then again the PSV is just a prettier PSP. I'm not seeing why it's such a big deal, to be honest. hell, the SNES was just a more powerful NES, the PS2 was essentially just a more powerful PS1, the Gameboy Advance was just a more powerful game boy.

So yeah, when it all comes down to it, I Really don't see why that quote is any less truthful than what you're all claiming. Maybe you guys need to calm down a bit. (For the record, I do not work for GamrFeed or GamrConnect or anything like that, I'm just a review guy, so this isn't some misguided attempt at self defense, just an honest opinion on the matter.)

I like the GamrFeed articles.

What you actually mean OP is that you don't like to read editorials that feature your console(s) of choice in a less than bright light. But then again, who does?

It's ok, breathe in and then out. The masses will decide which one comes out on top. We're but a drop in the middle of the ocean.

It's not just the editiorials. The news that shows up on the site (hours or sometimes days late) often has snide comments and false information. This news section on this site sucks. That's why people complain.

ah, that's a different story then.  news is supposed to be unbiased (though it hardly ever is.)  I stay out of the department so I have no idea, but I think they've done really well with their editorials...got a lot of people arguing didn't they?  LAst I checked that's what an editorial was supposed to do, incite discussion. if everyone just calmly agreed it wouldn't be doing its job! 

Hardly. Users will remain here for "the sales figures and the community" (that line is so overused, it's getting amusing, xD) and still view the articles every so often because, they don't actually lose anything by reading the article, regardless of whether or not it would have been written better by a monkey on a typewriter. Therefore, by publishing flamebait that hasn't been proofread, gamrFeed gets more hits despite putting in way less effort in terms of editing and accuracy without losing any significant proportion of its readership since they all stay for the rest of the site.

Businesswise, it's a genius strategy!

I'm not exactly seeing an issue.  sure, it's a little silly and lighthearted, but the point of that article was to talk about Sony being almost as childlike as Nintendo at times...I think it fits.  Plus I noticed a lot of the things they pointed out on there independent of the articls, so I actually agree.