No, I base my ideology off my sound interpretation of the facts and time will most certainly bare my observations out.  Let's say that in 2012 a Republican President is elected.  If the Republicans continue on the path that they're on now with all of their cuts etc and they start to cut things that the poor people really depend upon like social security, medicare / medicaid, welfare, you can certainly expect some scary times from 2012 to 2016 and the new President to go out on in his ear in 2016 most likely being replaced by a white liberal.

I was listening to the Sean Hannity show today and some woman called in and started talking about how awful she thinks it is that many people don't work and are on the draw.  And she said that she thinks when we get a new President, then everybody will go back to work.

However, do you think that if we get a new President everyone will automatically clean themselves up and try to live upstanding, hard working lives?  Hey what about the high school drop out welfare mothers in Eastern Kentucky that have five or six kids and depend on welfare to feed them?  Do you think all of these women will automatically go out and get upstanding jobs the next day?  You shouldn't because cutting off these welfare mama's checks would be no different than state opposed abortions which as a Christian you must surely be opposed to.

What about all the meth heads and drug addicts in Appalachia and the various ghettoes across the US?  Do you think they're going to go out and be clean cut citizens of the world the very next day if their welfare checks are suddenly cut off?  No way, they're going to turn into cutthroats and will basically be like a shuffling army of zombies ready to kill anyone in order to get the money for their fixes if the checks that keep them placated now are taken away.

We've got far too many people in this country that are in far too bad a shape right now to be able to make any real positive changes for the better in this country and stopping the rich guy's footing the bill to take care of those folks which is the Tea Parties' true aim can only result in catastrophe. 

So ed, why havent you responded to my replay post yet?

I think more people would agree that your beliefs are complete and utter bullshit, not the Christian ones

He didn't say she "talks like a slut", he said she's a "talk slut", and he was pointing out her hypocrisy of criticising Obama for something she praiesd Bush for. He was not referring at all to her sexual conduct. Yet again another attempt by conservatives to prove their point using misquotes.

Well, I tried finding a study or something, but sadly I couldn't find anything. You're free to find a study that disproves it though. Here's an article talking about the psychological effects of hate crimes on targeted groups.

http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/french/crim/cpm/2005/HateCrimeDiscrimination.pdf

He didn't call her a "slut". He called her a "talk slut". He wasn't criticising her sexual conduct, which would be a sexist thing to do, he was pointing out her hypocrisy as a journalist for critcising Obama for something she praised Bush for. Would you say that calling a woman an "attention whore" is sexist too? I mean, it has the word "whore" in it after all, so it must be sexist going bu your logic (even though it has no relation to sexual conduct either). Maybe the word "cunt" is sexist, but by that definition so is callign someone a "dick". Ironically, I googled this term and found out it's considered by many to be the most offensive term in the English dictionary. This is quite funny, because finding this term so offensive (much more offensive than the term "dick", for example) is itself sexist, because it suggests that women's sexual organs are "dirtier" than everything else. Finding this term so offensive actually perpetuates the negative image that women have of their own sexual organs. Finally, what would you call a Jewish person who is also a Nazi?

Well, that's because most people are stupid (80% of US citizens believe in a God that there's no evidence for -- http://www.cnsnews.com/node/65396 ) and that's why it would be so easy to set up a movement similar to Fascism in the US.

As a matter of fact we have already have a movement similar to fascism in the US, and it is Fundamentalist Christianity because it causes and supports discrimination against gays and other minority religious groups (wanting to change them to prevent them from going to an imaginary Hell is a sign of discrimination as it shows that the Fundamentalist Christians have little to no respect for the ideas of others or for the way they would like to live their lives and that has no place in a country built on freedom and justice (and justice includes social justice) for all); and it  prevents many of its followers from really doing anything to really improve their lives like the fast food and other poor workers that really believe its teachings and that actively work against or don't push for things that would have been to their own interest ( http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47498.html and http://blog.locustfork.net/2011/06/why-do-working-class-people-vote-against-their-economic-interests/ )  like a tax plan that taxes all of those making $250,000 a year 10% more so that the lower classes can have better services than they're able to afford on their own.  And they work against these things because, as their religion teaches them, they believe the end of the world is nigh and that Jesus is going to come back soon to alleviate all of their ills which is the type of thinking that the slave system that Christianity is has already engendered many times throughout history, and Christianity, as a direct descendent of the religion used to keep the slaves in line in Ancient Egypt and much as a caste system by the Hebrews to keep the undesirables of their time in line under the thumb of their priestly classes, and by Constantine as a way of keeping the Roman Empire in charge of things without having to worry about attacks from barbarian since when you have a system in place for controlling other people's thoughts you can control their actions much more easily than you can by merely trying to force them to stay in line (  http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread678908/pg1 ); does create a ready made system for keeping the poor working class in line especially if the public education system is ever thrown out by the Right Wing idealogues that want to attack it ( http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/179079-republican-war-science-education-progress-general-working.html ).

So, yes, we do have a fascist movement in this country already.  Fundamentalist Christianity (it's just as fascistic today as it was when it caused nearly 100 people in Salem Massachusetts to lose their lives in 1692 and during the Middle Ages when it resulted in the deaths of 100,000 people in Europe from a wide variety of different backgrounds including other Christians that believed a bit differently from the mainstream Christians of that time, and that was largely emulated by Hitler during his exterminations of Jews in World War II http://www.affirmation.org/proclamation_on_the_family/hidden_nazi_mentality.shtml and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Jews_in_the_First_Crusade  ), and it is waiting for Conservatism in this country to gain more power so that it can gain more control over those that believe differently  ( http://www.onenewsnow.com/Journal/editorial.aspx?id=1281490 ) ,   and probably as always much to those individuals that choose to do so's detriment (already thanks (i'm being sracastic with that) largely to the influence of Christians, gays aren't free to get married like any other citizen in the US ( http://www.fatalistic.net/kouri/discrim.html ) and being an abortion clinic doctor ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence ) or belonging to Islam, another miniority religious group, or going with the fact that there is no evidence for God's existence at all and being an Atheist instead (  http://www.opposingviews.com/i/sick-of-hearing-christians-claim-religious-discrimination ) makes one a target for the wrath of Fundamentalists .

As Sinclair Lewis said , “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. "  Which is a pretty good summation of the three headed beast composed of the Tea Party, Social Conservatism, and Fundamentalist Christianity as they are in America today (http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/634767/the_rise_of_the_teavangelicals..._it_wasn't_as_sudden_as_you_think/ ),   And as Bill Maher says even if you're right that more people might think my ideas are the bs ones and that the Christian ones are the right ones (even though there's no evidence at all to suggest that they are correct), that doesn't make my views wrong (  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jdtLTIzZWo ) .

sorry, i (as well as most of america) dont subscribe to socialist doctrines.

as much as you like saying Christianity, is Fascist, it doesnt make it true, especially with lack of evidence. heresyou arguement, fascism is going to come from the tea party, because they are Christians, and Christians are Fascists, so therefore they are fascists.

thats great reasoning, but you might want to have facts to back it up, and im still waiting for an example of a small government becoming a fascist dictatorship

Actually most Americans do subscribe to socialist doctrines.  Are you trying to say that all of the people on welfare don't enjoy getting their welfare and food stamps each month or that the old folks would really like to be without their Medicare and Social Security Checks and that coal mining families would absolutely relish being without their Black Lung?

I've provided ample evidence that Christianity is fascist time and time again.  Just check out the links in my last post.  It looks you're the one that lacks reading comprehension skills, Dummy.

The thing is as in the links that I provided above, Dummy, the Tea Party might say it's pushing for smaller government, however, what it is really pushing for is control of many people's lives in many different areas.  They want to stop women from getting abortions, stop gays from getting married, stop gays from serving in the military, deny people of other faiths the right to practice their religions in this nation, and stop funding of public education which is really the only thing that allows many minorities like African Americans and poor kids in Appalachia to be able to go to school.  So how is that working for a government that has no part in how people live their lives?

And both Hitler and Mussolini started out smaller than they later became.  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100502003857AAl2fop -- This deals with how Hitler wanted a smaller government (mainly himself) and was primarily a Right Winger. 

Even "Talk Slut" is innappropriate and sexist ... Or are you under the impression that we can use offensive terms about people as long as we preface them with something and claim that they weren't being used in an offensive way?

Consider that there are lots of people who believe that Barack Obama is too accommodating to both the Republican and Democrat leadership, and making a claim about this wouldn’t be offensive or wrong; but if someone were to call him a "Political Uncle Tom" to make this point it would  be a remarkably inappropriate and racist way to get the point across.

Well, the term "talk slut" was actually used in an offensive way. The ideea is that it's not sexist. I don't think you're arguing that just offending someone is anything more than unpolite, no?

I'd have to read Uncle Tom's Cabin before beign able to judge how racist the term "political Uncle Tom" would be.