Nobody with any knowledge of the subject - let along a scientist in the field - would ever claim that hydrogen and nitrogen caused the big bang. Why? Because it's a load of utter bollocks. Hydrogen and nitrogen didn't exist when the big bang occured. Continuing to claim it just makes you look really really ignorant on the subject.

I'm sorry for the length of this post, but I think it sheds light on this subject if you read what I have to say...This topic as seen will always ignite debates with different belief systems. Of course everyone is entitled to their belief system but ultimately something happened that caused us to exist. So the question will always be asked.

I am seeing some on here imply that the existence of God contradicts Science and that it is impossible for one to believe in a God if they adhere completely to Science. This is ABSOLUTELY false. I will explain my viewpoint. One can indeed believe in God as well as adhere to Science.

Science indeed will always be science. Man will continually learn more of what Science already knows as science develops with new tools, new methods, and new events allowing for man to study science using mathematics, physics, ect. I concur that Science has yet to disprove that a higher power exists. Also we must say that man using Science cannot simply use a platform that captures the energy of a higher being that they can use the scientific method on. All a Scientist can do when trying to answer the question of if God exists is base the result on circumstantial evidence they can gather in the universe for the basics of life to exist.

When you take the question of where the universe began you have to look at when and how it all began. We ultimately have two options to choose from here.

1. In the beginning there was only space, time, and gravity that existed. From a singular point over an undetermined amount of time the universe began to be formed. (Without an intelligent being through mathematical possibilities and chance)

2. In the beginning a vastly intelligent and powerful being either began the process or created everything we know in the universe. (With a vastly intelligent being).

So you have to choose which option you will go. No matter what theory you come up with  on how the universe began you will always get to the starting point when it was either an intelligent being or only space, time, gravity that started the universe through mathematical possibilities. To use Science one must have logic. Without logic existing there would be no understanding of Science, nor any way to utilize mathematics at all.

My argument is that we by no means can have what exists today without some kind of intelligent being that set these things in place.

One of the stumbling blocks for any explanation of the universe without an intelligent designer is the fact that we have logic. Time and Time again you cannot put dead matter into a test environment and eventually come out with something that has obtained logic. Science proves this, does it not? There are many other factors I could discuss but based on the existence of logic alone that is absolute evidence of an intelligent creator whom we would refer to as God of the Universe.

Logic isn't something that "exists", it is a "tool" that was invented by humans, and that humans use. Your argument takes into consideration very limited possibilities.

My professor has a doctorate in theology and a master in history, his mother was the vice-president of the Catholics women of the world he was raised in a strict catholic family and he said that he believes in the big-bang and the human evolution theory because there is a lot of evidence and it is time to not to believe in it but to accept it.

Logic isn't something that exists? you must not be understanding me. You have logic and I have logic. We have the ability to give and experience reasoning. To discern and understand. yes, logic is something that exists. No scientific test that I am aware of suggests that dead matter will eventually obtain understanding, and the ability to reason. Dead matter is dead matter. You and I have the ability to understand and discern, because we were designed that way. If we look to Science then a universe with no intelligence to begin it is impossible.

You say I am giving limited possibilities, then what other possibilities do you suggest to explain the beginnings of our universe?

burden,you make this sound like a war?

i gave it as of the reasons,never said its the correct one.

alrite,i would agree.never said you were wrong.

i did say that it was one of the theories i heard.i did not say i know big bang completely and am the correct one.it isn't being ignorant.chk my first sentence.i never said that is the most accepted theory or the correct one.

I don't believe in God. The very concept of a God seems absurd to me.
I don't fully believe in the Big Bang because it's very difficult to understand such a thing.

Beleiveing in something regardless of the facts means that you are ignoring or denying the facts, thats why the word ''regardless'' is there, and why would you choose to ignore or deny something if it doesnt go aginst your beliefs? 

You can keep on playing the words game but your point is still very unclear to me. Why can't I follow science and beleive in God at the same time? Answer to this or dont answer at all.

Im just curious why the concept of God seems absurd to you? Also would you care to elaborate on your point of view?