By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Player1x3 on 11 July 2011
Edit Thread
Runa216 said:
Player1x3 said:

Runa216 said:

What? 

and no, I said that faith is believing in something without adequate (or no) supporting evidence.  stop twisting my words, no wonder it's so hard to argue with those of faith. 

Read again. its really not hard to understand.

In your replay to that american guy Kazs206, you said ''Faith is to believe something regardless of the facts, or lack thereof'' To believe in something regardless of the facts indicates that you meant faith is something you believe in despite the facts showing otherwise. I noted you also said, lack therof, which is why I used ''You seem'' I didnt said you directly said it, but rather it seemed you drift towards the tought

*eyetwitch*  just stop it, seriously.  Lack of disproof is not proof.  not going up doesn't mean you're going down.  Believing in something in regardless of the facts is not the same as believing in something that's been proven wrong.  They are not the same thing and stop assuming they are.  


Beleiveing in something regardless of the facts means that you are ignoring or denying the facts, thats why the word ''regardless'' is there, and why would you choose to ignore or deny something if it doesnt go aginst your beliefs? 

You can keep on playing the words game but your point is still very unclear to me. Why can't I follow science and beleive in God at the same time? Answer to this or dont answer at all.