By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Crysis ONE coming to PS360!

Crysis 1 is a great game... Why you hatin'? STOP HATIN'!

It's a very different game from Crysis 2, the first is more open and has more freedom, but maybe it has less action. And I'm guessing they'll include Warhead on the pack too.

Also, where's the "partial nudity" in Crysis 2? Did I miss something?



Around the Network

I'll be getting this. Hopefully it's value priced



I'd buy this. I liked crysis 2, but really could'nt get into the multiplayer and traded it in,but it was a decent game.



Time for PC elitists to start comparing the graphics of Crysis running on a high-end PC with the graphics on the PS3/360 and making fun of consoles. It's inevitable. Otherwise, this is good news! Did Crysis 1 have multiplayer?



DaColdFlash said:
Releasing a 4year old PC benchmark on consoles. Yes that's what we needed.


Except that the consoles will still not be able to play the game with as good graphics, and eventhough the gameplay itself was very mediocre it is about on par with console games. Basically, what's your point?

OT:

I have always said Crysis was mediocre, PC exclusive or not, so I am curious how HD console gamers will react to it now.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

Around the Network

Releasing Crysis 2 before Crysis is a pretty wierd thing to do. Crytek should advertise the game as a prequel and bundle Crysis Warhead with it to. It would be nice to see what those game look like on console, the tech demo of the original Crysis was beautiful.



more games for your system is never a bad thing, mostly. i dont have a PC that could run Crysis 1 and honestly dont care about graphics too much, but i am curious to see if the game was good or just a graphics fest



DaColdFlash said:
Releasing a 4year old PC benchmark on consoles. Yes that's what we needed.

It's the clear sign that deep inside, the PS3 and 360 are upgradeable, and only now the ability is unlocked. Frankly, there is no reason to play Crysis other than to bench your PC IMO.

Sony was wrong. This gen will last FOREVER!



vlad321 said:
DaColdFlash said:
Releasing a 4year old PC benchmark on consoles. Yes that's what we needed.


Except that the consoles will still not be able to play the game with as good graphics, and eventhough the gameplay itself was very mediocre it is about on par with console games. Basically, what's your point?

OT:

I have always said Crysis was mediocre, PC exclusive or not, so I am curious how HD console gamers will react to it now.

 

Crysis is senseless on consoles. The game was all and pretty much only about graphics, trying to exhaust even the best hardware. The whole game was a whole benchmark and it was mostly used for dick comparison hardware wise. Now the game itself is as you stated pretty mediocre which makes the only good thing about it it's technology. Let's just cut straight to the point:

Consoles = Not so good graphics

Crysis = All about graphics

What's left? Gameplay

How's the gameplay? Mediocre

Where's the sense in releasing a 4year old mediocre shooter? Nowhere

That was pretty much my point.






 

pezus said:
oniyide said:
more games for your system is never a bad thing, mostly. i dont have a PC that could run Crysis 1 and honestly dont care about graphics too much, but i am curious to see if the game was good or just a graphics fest

It was better than Crysis 2 at the very least.


havent played either, ill have to take your word for it