Viper1 said:

Keep in mind the dev kits are underclocked, not final hardware and still very early on.   At this point for MS and Sony (2004 and 2005 respectively), they were showing CGI video target renders. and not any real footage at all or it was very poor compared to what it became.

The mere fact that something like the garden demo and Zelda demo even exist in the state that they are in is pretty damn impressive.

While I think the Zelda HD demo looks phenomenal (!), I wouldn't mind having a game with a new original art-style either. God, the possibilities are just endless !!

I didn't say I don't like it... I just said there nothing in the Tech Demo the PS3/360 cann't do the same.

The Wii U is supposed to be 50% better than PS360 or use a GPU RV770 based... it will do graphics like Crysis (the first one) in 1080p @ 60fps with AA . The Tech Demo is not impressive to show the power of Wii U... it was disappointing because it is this gen graphics and not next gen.

Heheh..

I guess I'm blinded by the unskippable text that I see every time I pick up an item ;)

Yeah those are annoying, I didn't say WW was perfect.... however the open chest animation and the transport/warp animation (like when in an underground cave) are by far the most interesting in WW... TPs was so dull