By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - US 'to view major cyber attacks as acts of war'

US 'to view major cyber attacks as acts of war'

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon has adopted a new strategy that will classify major cyber attacks as acts of war, paving the way for possible military retaliation, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.

The newspaper said the Pentagon plans to unveil its first-ever strategy regarding cyber warfare next month, in part as a warning to foes that may try to sabotage the country's electricity grid, subways or pipelines.

"If you shut down our power grid, maybe we will put a missile down one of your smokestacks," it quoted a military official as saying.

The newspaper, citing three officials who had seen the document, said the the strategy would maintain that the existing international rules of armed conflict -- embodied in treaties and customs -- would apply in cyberspace.

It said the Pentagon would likely decide whether to respond militarily to cyber attacks based on the notion of "equivalence" -- whether the attack was comparable in damage to a conventional military strike.

Such a decision would also depend on whether the precise source of the attack could be determined.

The decision to formalize the rules of cyber war comes after the Stuxnet attack last year ravaged Iran's nuclear program. That attack was blamed on the United States and Israel, both of which declined to comment on it.

It also follows a major cyber attack on the US military in 2008 that served as a wake-up call and prompted major changes in how the Pentagon handles digital threats, including the formation of a new cyber military command.

Over the weekend Lockheed Martin, one of the world's largest defense contractors, said it was investigating the source of a "significant and tenacious" cyber attack against its information network one week ago.

President Barack Obama was briefed about the attack.

source



Around the Network

i thought it was interesting, i was listening to NPR this morning and they had a segment on hackers.  they talked about the hacking of sony's psn, pbs, and (mostly) lockheed martin.  at the end of the segment they talked about the pentagon and their formalizing a stance on cyber attacks. 



Breaking news: US wages war on Internet

"All webservers and computers must be destroyed" announced the president of the United States. USA reponded to an cyber attack by launching missiles at its own sever farms in retailiation to the attack. 



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong

Most hackers are individuals who probably live in the states, sending a missille will not help;.



 

Lostplanet22 said:

Most hackers are individuals who probably live in the states, sending a missille will not help;.


i'm not sure i agree with that part but yeah, sending missiles won't help.  i laughed at that quote as well.

"If you shut down our power grid, maybe we will put a missile down one of your smokestacks," it quoted a military official as saying.



Around the Network

DEVGRU headed to LulzSec's house as we speak.



Senior officers are still out-of-touch idiots I see. Awesome.



This isn't declaring hacking an act of war. It's simply formalising what is already known as cyber warfare as an act of war. It's completely understandable - when a state attacks another state through the internet it still causes damage.



Rath said:

This isn't declaring hacking an act of war. It's simply formalising what is already known as cyber warfare as an act of war. It's completely understandable - when a state attacks another state through the internet it still causes damage.


Exactly! This makes perfect sense, considering an attack is an attack no matter if it is hacking or physical violence. It also gives us more excuses to invade for oil, because thats all we do right? :P



"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius

Rath said:

This isn't declaring hacking an act of war. It's simply formalising what is already known as cyber warfare as an act of war. It's completely understandable - when a state attacks another state through the internet it still causes damage.


but as lostplanet said above, hackers are generally individuals not states.