By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Vgchartz ranking game -- Super Mario Galaxy 2!

There should be a rule against counting reviews when someone didn't finish the game.  Also, I can't believe this game is ~1 year old already.

My score though.  9.6.  Tight controls.  Solid pace.  Well developed mechanics.  Strong orchestrated pieces.

Gripes.

Analog stick 2D Platforming = :| for me  The 2D sections are very much playable but just feel awkward after quite a bit of 3D action.

Underdeveloped overworld.  The overworld lacked the sense of choice and branching paths games like SMB3 had.

Other than that, near perfect game.







Pixel Art can be fun.

Around the Network
Conegamer said:

If you're not a fan of the game, simply don't vote...

Totally agreed. In fact, I propose yo_john creates a new rule:

"7. If you don't like the game, fuck off. Differing viewpoints are not wanted here."

A score is a score. If he thinks that a intricate storyline would make a game about plumbers riding on dinosaurs in space more enjoyable, then more power to him.

By the way, Rol, you gave the original a 9.2.



Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:

If you're not a fan of the game, simply don't vote...

Totally agreed. In fact, I propose yo_john creates a new rule:

"7. If you don't like the game, fuck off. Differing viewpoints are not wanted here."

A score is a score. If he thinks that a intricate storyline would make a game about plumbers riding on dinosaurs in space more enjoyable, then more power to him.

By the way, Rol, you gave the original a 10.0

I agree wholeheartedly with that rule. Apart from maybe worded a bit differently

Why contribute when you're just gonna ruin it for everyone?

Anyway, enough about that. I don't wanna de-rail a happy thread. As long as the low score is gone I'm happy!



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Conegamer said:
Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:

If you're not a fan of the game, simply don't vote...

Totally agreed. In fact, I propose yo_john creates a new rule:

"7. If you don't like the game, fuck off. Differing viewpoints are not wanted here."

A score is a score. If he thinks that a intricate storyline would make a game about plumbers riding on dinosaurs in space more enjoyable, then more power to him.

By the way, Rol, you gave the original a 10.0 9.2. Don't mess with my post. >:(

I agree wholeheartedly with that rule. Apart from maybe worded a bit differently

Why contribute when you're just gonna ruin it for everyone?

Anyway, enough about that. I don't wanna de-rail a happy thread. As long as the low score is gone I'm happy!

I... Was actually being sarcastic about that first part. I thought it'd be pretty obvious.

These threads are about sharing our opinions, positive or negative, about games. Prohibiting people who don't like the game from voting would result in these threads becoming nothing but metaphorical circlejerks.

"I see you gave Super Mario Galaxy 2 a 10. So did I!"

"Cool beans, old chap."

Productive conversation, indeed.

Plus, it would result in all games being above the 9 range, since nobody's giving low scores. And that would be stupid.

There's been far more outrageous scores and justifications for said scores in other threads than Marco's.



Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:
Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:

If you're not a fan of the game, simply don't vote...

Totally agreed. In fact, I propose yo_john creates a new rule:

"7. If you don't like the game, fuck off. Differing viewpoints are not wanted here."

A score is a score. If he thinks that a intricate storyline would make a game about plumbers riding on dinosaurs in space more enjoyable, then more power to him.

By the way, Rol, you gave the original a 10.0 9.2. Don't mess with my post. >:(

I agree wholeheartedly with that rule. Apart from maybe worded a bit differently

Why contribute when you're just gonna ruin it for everyone?

Anyway, enough about that. I don't wanna de-rail a happy thread. As long as the low score is gone I'm happy!

I... Was actually being sarcastic about that first part. I thought it'd be pretty obvious.

These threads are about sharing our opinions, positive or negative, about games. Prohibiting people who don't like the game from voting would result in these threads becoming nothing but metaphorical circlejerks.

"I see you gave Super Mario Galaxy 2 a 10. So did I!"

"Cool beans, old chap."

Productive conversation, indeed.

Plus, it would result in all games being above the 9 range, since nobody's giving low scores. And that would be stupid.

There's been far more outrageous scores and justifications for said scores in other threads than Marco's.

Right on the money.

If I feel like someone is putting a low score just to sabotage the game then I will remove that person's score....that said I am watching Marco carefully and If I suspect foul play I will ban him from the ranking games.



Around the Network

I loved the game from start to finish! Near perfect in every way and SO much fun to play :D

I give it a 10!



Bump



yo_john117 said:
Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:
Ninpanda said:
Conegamer said:

If you're not a fan of the game, simply don't vote...

Totally agreed. In fact, I propose yo_john creates a new rule:

"7. If you don't like the game, fuck off. Differing viewpoints are not wanted here."

A score is a score. If he thinks that a intricate storyline would make a game about plumbers riding on dinosaurs in space more enjoyable, then more power to him.

By the way, Rol, you gave the original a 10.0 9.2. Don't mess with my post. >:(

I agree wholeheartedly with that rule. Apart from maybe worded a bit differently

Why contribute when you're just gonna ruin it for everyone?

Anyway, enough about that. I don't wanna de-rail a happy thread. As long as the low score is gone I'm happy!

I... Was actually being sarcastic about that first part. I thought it'd be pretty obvious.

These threads are about sharing our opinions, positive or negative, about games. Prohibiting people who don't like the game from voting would result in these threads becoming nothing but metaphorical circlejerks.

"I see you gave Super Mario Galaxy 2 a 10. So did I!"

"Cool beans, old chap."

Productive conversation, indeed.

Plus, it would result in all games being above the 9 range, since nobody's giving low scores. And that would be stupid.

There's been far more outrageous scores and justifications for said scores in other threads than Marco's.

Right on the money.

If I feel like someone is putting a low score just to sabotage the game then I will remove that person's score....that said I am watching Marco carefully and If I suspect foul play I will ban him from the ranking games.

Well yeah, I agree, but a score so low when all the other scores are so high obviously shows sabotage to me, or an anomolus result. Either way, it should be removed

I'd say this for any game BTW. Not just this one.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

An excellent platformer with amazing level design.

Score: 9.4

(Yeah... I'm a bit lazy today...)



2012 - Top 3 [so far]

                                                                             #1                                       #2                                      #3

      

Conegamer said:

Well yeah, I agree, but a score so low when all the other scores are so high obviously shows sabotage to me, or an anomolus result. Either way, it should be removed

I'd say this for any game BTW. Not just this one.

Well he's got a 5.0 for Lost Odyssey (lowest score for that game) and now a 5.2 for Super Mario Galaxy 2 (by far the lowest score for this game too). Maybe next game he'll bump his score up to a 5.4.