Immortal said:
pitzy272 said:
Nsanity, is it me, or do I always see you make nothing but positive threads about Microsoft, and nothing but negative threads about Sony? You definitely seem to be a fan of Microsoft, which is absolutely fine; but then I don't see the need to always make your Sony threads. I'm not trying to pick a fight, but it just seems to me like you have an agenda. Correct me if I'm wrong or am missing something.
|
I've noticed he generally just posts news threads, hardly his opinion. Even the news is cherry-picked to be pro-MS or anti-Sony, he's still one of the more productive members of the site for doing so and you really can't accuse him of fanboyishness for posting others' reporting.
|
See it doesn't really matter if he posts news articles or not - if he's cherry-picking all pro-Microsoft but ALSO all ANTI-Sony articles, then that absolutely, to me, speaks very loudly of a personal agenda. I personally like the ps3 bc its games fit my personal taste; whereas the 360's games don't so much. I've posted some Sony/ps3 threads, but what would be my purpose of creating a Microsoft thread posting negative things about them and the 360 other than to make them look bad compared to Sony/ps3? If he posted just one or two anti-Sony threads, okay whatever, still kind of odd but not a big deal. But from what I've seen he posts a lot of threads, and every one focused on Microsoft discusses positive material, while every thread about Sony is negative. To me that just doesn't seem right. But maybe it's just me.
In terms of him being a productive member of VGC, I agree - only partially though. As I said, he posts a LOT of threads. I think the Microsoft fans really seem to appreciate it. He keeps people updated on Microsoft news maybe more than anyone else I've seen. Even I appreciate it, bc I like seeing news on Microsoft, Nintendo, and gaming in general in addition to Sony news. And even if he posts all positive and no negative news on Microsoft, again that's totally cool and I understand that - who wants to make the company they appreciate look bad? But as I've stated, when he goes the opposite direction and tries ALSO to make Sony look bad, that's what I disagree with, especially when I see 100% bad and 0% good.