By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Project Cafe/3DS and the abandoning of the consumer

@axt113  im gonna sound like an asshole but whatever, f*** the market, i care about Galaxy 2 and Other M. I dont give a damn about what some old person who thinks the 3d games are complicated think. I know that sounds crude but really they dont care about the games a like and i dont really care about the games they like. In an ideal world we would have a 50 50 split but if ninty had to choose i would hope they go with the Galaxys

And i find it strange that you said that they didnt follow up, Are you joking?? one of the complaints of wii is that there were too many copy cat Wiisports fit and dancing games. the library is made up of a lot of those are you really telling me that we needed more Ea sports, just dances, get in fit with melb, Raquet sports 5, biggest loser, etc.??



Around the Network
axt113 said:
Mr Khan said:

I swore off this, and yet i return.

Where is the proof that Skyward Sword is focused on Puzzle-solving over fighting, which is the underlying accusation your comment is loaded with? If anything we should see the most substantial combat of the 3D era


When was the last time Zelda wasn;t loaded down with puzzles and other boring crap?  When was the last time you weren't stuck on a boat or in a train or doing some other boring travelling and backtracking in Zelda?

I'll be happy to be proven wrong about Skyward Sword, but I won't hold my breath, I'm expecting a little bit of swordfighting and a ton of puzzles

Just making Zelda a swordfighting game with no puzzles or backtracking fundamentally changes what makes Zelda, Zelda.  Sure, some of the sailing and train riding could get a little boring at times, and there's always improvements that can be made, but it sounds as though Zelda's just not a game for you.  And there's surely people who would agree with you, but for those of us who love Zelda, we don't want to see it stray from its essence and become another game.

Which brings me to your disdain for 3D Mario.  No, it's not going to appeal to as many people as 2D Mario, but it is what it is, and a lot of people love it for that.  Not every single game on a system has to be completely revolutionary or a bonafide system seller in order to justify its existence.  And not everything that's popular is necessarily regarded as the best, quality wise.  Is American Idol the best show on TV or is Justin Bieber the best music out there?

Why take away people's ability to enjoy a wide variety of experiences?  Ironically, the NES, DS, and PS2, which you actually credit as being successful, had just that; a varied library of software.



@axt113:

Your point of view is understandable but really stubborn.

Yes Nintendo realise they need 2D mario, Miyamoto stated that a 2D Mario will appear on the 3DS! Also NSMBWii IS a bridge game, that mean it's a game that can please and be played by new comers/lapse gamers/core gamers/hardcore gamers. Every one will find something to do in it, as for Mario Kart Wii that is a bridge game too.

For this point, yes Nintendo need bridge games for the 3DS and project cafe but they are likely to come too: 3DS will have mario kart and a 2D Mario and project cafe will likely too.

Your problem is that there are not a "Wii Sport" for 3DS right of the bat, but you know what? The mass appeal games for the DS also come some time down the line. Let them a little time to see how they will manage the platform.

For my opinion SMG and Metroid: other M and Zelda are not waste of ressources, Nintendo need as much as diverse game as possible. If you piss off your core and only release wii sport and mario 2D games, they won't buy your next device. Not everyone love mario and zelda and samus and kirby, but there is possible they love 3, 2 or 1 of them and are willing to buy your console to play them. You just can't say Nintendo had better done a Wii Music2 or Animal Crossing2 (large appeal game normally) than SMG2. Even if it's not successful as NSMBWii, it stands on it own merits. Not every games are suppose to be system seller, but some games together will help to sell your console: look at the PS3, most of the PS3 exclusives weren't system seller, but together they hold and push the system that doing well now because of its well rounded librairy.



But we must first concentrate ourselves on the way to entertain people, for video games to live. Else, it's a world where sales representative will win, which has as effect to kill creativity. I want to say to the creators all around the world:"Courage, Dare!". Shigeru Miyamoto.

archbrix said:
axt113 said:
Mr Khan said:

I swore off this, and yet i return.

Where is the proof that Skyward Sword is focused on Puzzle-solving over fighting, which is the underlying accusation your comment is loaded with? If anything we should see the most substantial combat of the 3D era


When was the last time Zelda wasn;t loaded down with puzzles and other boring crap?  When was the last time you weren't stuck on a boat or in a train or doing some other boring travelling and backtracking in Zelda?

I'll be happy to be proven wrong about Skyward Sword, but I won't hold my breath, I'm expecting a little bit of swordfighting and a ton of puzzles

Just making Zelda a swordfighting game with no puzzles or backtracking fundamentally changes what makes Zelda, Zelda.  Sure, some of the sailing and train riding could get a little boring at times, and there's always improvements that can be made, but it sounds as though Zelda's just not a game for you.  And there's surely people who would agree with you, but for those of us who love Zelda, we don't want to see it stray from its essence and become another game.

Which brings me to your disdain for 3D Mario.  No, it's not going to appeal to as many people as 2D Mario, but it is what it is, and a lot of people love it for that.  Not every single game on a system has to be completely revolutionary or a bonafide system seller in order to justify its existence.  And not everything that's popular is necessarily regarded as the best, quality wise.  Is American Idol the best show on TV or is Justin Bieber the best music out there?

Why take away people's ability to enjoy a wide variety of experiences?  Ironically, the NES, DS, and PS2, which you actually credit as being successful, had just that; a varied library of software.

This.



axt113 said:
ZaP~ said:

@axt113

It's impressive how you continue with what you believe.

I won't even try to counter your points of view, the trees don't let you see the forest. But i disagree your way of thinking, hands down.


ou can disagree with me, but you can;t disagree with the fact that Wii has declined and 3DS has ben underwhelming to say the least and that Nintendo has done it to themselves

The 
DS is underwhelming because of the price and the fact that Nintendo thought that casual games and clasic games would drive the console. They released Nintendog (casual game key title in the DS's early success) consumers didn't want it they also brought Pilot Wings a successful SNES era game. Short of 2D Mario that is exactly what you want Nintendo to do and yet it failed.

Turns out consumers don't want more of the same. 

And Galaxy did push hardware the week it came out it went up to 458,416 from 281,934 the week before and went up to 670,095 the week after etc that is pushing hardware, where as NSMB Wii only went to 713,415 from 524,453 a smaller relative boost to hardware. Mario Kart Wii on the other hand is the real hardware mover boosting hardware to 710,311 from 314,078, so obviously Nintendo shouldn't be wasting it's resorces on crap that doesn't move hardware like NSMB Wii and instead focus on cart racers as those are what reall drive hardware. And Kart did it in April instead of November so much more impressive.



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

Around the Network
axt113 said:
Mr Khan said:
axt113 said:
ZaP~ said:

@axt113

It's impressive how you continue with what you believe.

I won't even try to counter your points of view, the trees don't let you see the forest. But i disagree your way of thinking, hands down.


ou can disagree with me, but you can;t disagree with the fact that Wii has declined and 3DS has ben underwhelming to say the least and that Nintendo has done it to themselves

The second point is debatable in light of past performance (namely the predecessor to the device in question), but rather most of us are flabbergasted by this extremist philosophy that there is only 1 proper kind of game to make, and all else is just waste. We could make a discussion regarding how Nintendo might have better paced their software distribution across this generation, certainly, but while there are these fundamental disagreements (and this seemingly endless scorn being heaped upon them), the Malstromites cannot hold discourse with the non-Malstromites. I shall repeat my previous declaration of "Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home," and shunt from my field of vision all who zealously profess this virulent vitriol, for the sake of preserving my sanity and retaining any semblance of enjoyment as i peruse VGChartz


I didn;t say there is only one type of game to make, if you think that you misunderstand me, I am saying that many games should be made, but the should follow successful ideals, you can make meaty fare from the ideals in WSR and Wii Fit, you can make games that capture the old school feel of games, easier to pickup and play but lots of fun in a similar vein to NSMB, I'm not saying just make NSMB only, I'm saying don't waste  time on dead ends like 3D Mario and Other M and Skyward Sword, when better games can be made using the ideals of actual success


old school stuff and full blown games are all dead ends, the consumers have spoken and they want minigame collections (preferably sports themed,) kart racers and fitnes games. And as prof here are the 5 games that consumers have judged worthy, clearly everything else consumers don't want.

1
Wii Sports (Wii)
Nintendo, Sports
41.35 3.76 31.28 76.38
2
Wii Play (Wii)
Nintendo, Other
14.63 2.92 10.60 28.15
3
Mario Kart Wii (Wii)
Nintendo, Racer
11.68 3.13 11.87 26.69
4
Wii Sports Resort (Wii)
Nintendo, Sports
13.07 2.32 10.66 26.05
5
Wii Fit (Wii)
Nintendo, Sports
9.60 3.60 9.52 22.71

Just because you want old school games doesn't mean that consumers do or Nintendo should make them...



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

axt113 said:
ZaP~ said:

@axt113

It's impressive how you continue with what you believe.

I won't even try to counter your points of view, the trees don't let you see the forest. But i disagree your way of thinking, hands down.


ou can disagree with me, but you can;t disagree with the fact that Wii has declined and 3DS has ben underwhelming to say the least and that Nintendo has done it to themselves

How can you say the 3DS has been underwhelming with 1 month on USA and Europe and 2 months in Japan. I could believe if you said this 1 year later the release or after their first holiday season, but come on! the console just released.

And, as far as i know EVERY single console peaked at it's 3rd year and then it declines. Maybe the PS3 could be an exception (i don't remember in which year Slim launched), but every other console released has followed that trend, so if you tell me "Wii has declined" my answer is: such a news. I can agree that Wii is been selling underwhelming to the console that outsold the PS2 at the same time frame but that's not related to the development of Galaxy instead of NSMBWii 2 of another Mario Kart (if you could ever believe that releasing 2 Mario Kart on the same system would sell more systems than one Bridge title and  a core one)

On a console you don't have only big system sellers, you also some small ones, like  Fire Emblem, heck i know the game doesn't sell a lot and you could say it doesn't sell systems, but i know several people that after playing that game in my house bought a Gamecube to play Path of Radiance and bought a Wii for Radiant Dawn. Several games don't move a lot of people but gather an audience.

Nintendo the only thing it did to themselves was let the 3rd party have some space to gain confidence on their platform with the 3DS launch.

For me this thread is done. You are way too stubborn and neither of us will change his mind.



WiiU/Wii/3DS/DS/Xbox360/PS3/PSP Owner 
3DS FC: 1032-1246-9162  (Nacho)
Nintendo Network ID: Zap786
If you add me, please let me know to add you back

axt113 said:
Play4Fun said:
axt113 said:

Bridging the gap is a fool's errand

Just as 2D Mario fans will not necessarily be 3D mario fans, you cannot get old school expanded gamers to become hardcore gamers

yes the Wii hs been out less time than the PS2, but the way Nintendo has been treating  it the past few years, it won't be out as long as the PS2


Where'd you get that 'hardcore' crap from? No one is talking about making anyone 'hardcore'.

And no one is talking about old-school gamers either.

It talks about new gamers. People who came into gaming with the Wii.


It talked about converting the new gamers into loyalists, hence Hardcore, and my point is that that is a foolish attempt, since the new gamers are only gaming ecause of thei expanded and old school games, so unless you cater to them with more of those games, they will notstick around, they will not be bridged into loaylist gamers by 3D Mario and the like

There's so many old school games on Wii it's unreal. They catered for that market segment from start to end...



Yes.

www.spacemag.org - contribute your stuff... satire, comics, ideas, debate, stupidy stupid etc.

This thread is full of so much fail it's not even funny.  How is Nintendo "abandoning" the consumer by focusing more on what gamers actually WANT for a change?!?  They can only sell so many Wii Sports / Wii Fit / Wii Play titles for so long before their "expanded audience" starts to grow tired of such games, and you can't have a sustainable business model when the majority of your current audience buys only a handful of games a year, if that.

The most ironic thing is that, aside from the aformentioned casual-audience targeted games, the Wii's biggest selling titles are all traditional core franchises where little has changed from their predecessors.  Games like Galaxy 1 and 2, Mario Kart, Smash Bros Brawl, Twilight Princess, Prime 3, NSMB Wii, DKC Returns, etc, are all games that feature traditional control methods with motion controls tacked on as either a gameplay enhancement (Prime 3, Zelda, Galaxy), optional (MK Wii), or totally non-existent (Brawl).  Nintendo knows this, which is why their next system will (according to the rumors anyway) focus more on the traditional controller configuration rather than the Wiimote type controller.



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.

padib said:
axt113 said:
Mr Khan said:
axt113 said:
ZaP~ said:

@axt113

It's impressive how you continue with what you believe.

I won't even try to counter your points of view, the trees don't let you see the forest. But i disagree your way of thinking, hands down.


ou can disagree with me, but you can;t disagree with the fact that Wii has declined and 3DS has ben underwhelming to say the least and that Nintendo has done it to themselves

The second point is debatable in light of past performance (namely the predecessor to the device in question), but rather most of us are flabbergasted by this extremist philosophy that there is only 1 proper kind of game to make, and all else is just waste. We could make a discussion regarding how Nintendo might have better paced their software distribution across this generation, certainly, but while there are these fundamental disagreements (and this seemingly endless scorn being heaped upon them), the Malstromites cannot hold discourse with the non-Malstromites. I shall repeat my previous declaration of "Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home," and shunt from my field of vision all who zealously profess this virulent vitriol, for the sake of preserving my sanity and retaining any semblance of enjoyment as i peruse VGChartz


I didn;t say there is only one type of game to make, if you think that you misunderstand me, I am saying that many games should be made, but the should follow successful ideals, you can make meaty fare from the ideals in WSR and Wii Fit, you can make games that capture the old school feel of games, easier to pickup and play but lots of fun in a similar vein to NSMB, I'm not saying just make NSMB only, I'm saying don't waste  time on dead ends like 3D Mario and Other M and Skyward Sword, when better games can be made using the ideals of actual success

</endthread>

just kidding. Dude, I kind of see where you're coming from. Problem is, there are tons of flaws in the arguments you're bringing and it makes us all question

1) Your intent

and

2) Your insight.

All through the thread, I'm thinking "Thank God it's Iwata and not axt## leading Nintendo".

My friend, it's been said before

- The casual market is non-sustainable on its own

- To maintain the casual market, you need a solid userbase (the core).

Others have mentioned it, I'll simply restate:

- Rehashes of casual games won't sustain.

- Efforts following the casual game style, more in depth, have been made, and were unsuccessful (Red Steel, Metroid Prime 3, ...). Reason: The core is not large enough.

How do you attract the core? Change directions.

And that's exactly what Nintendo's doing. Now applaud.

and

</endthread>


I disagree, you cannot say the expanded market is unsustainible when Nintendo themselves choose not to support it, we can say the hardcore market is unsustainible due tothe failure of thsoe games on the Wii, the GCN, and the N64, not to mention the low low sales of the 3DS