By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - L.A Noire to come with PS3 exclusive content

because sony sold more rockstar games than microsoft



I trust no one, not even myself.

Around the Network
Munkeh111 said:

It probably won't be anything too big, can't wait for the game though


Why do it for 360 and leave ps3 users in the dust?



All of this, of course, is just my opinion.

Skyrim 100%'d. Dark Souls 100%'d. 
Dark Souls > Skyrim.
Halo 4 is the best damn FPS since Halo 3.
Proud pre-orderer of 2 PS4's and an Xbox One. 

Currently Playing: Dark Souls II, South Park
Playstation 4: MGS V GZ, Killzone: Shadow Fall, NBA 2k14.

mibuokami said:

God how I hate this , not only are you making launch DLC but you're limiting them by both console AND by retailer? Fuck that shit.


The last part pisses me off even more. Seriously? What is the point of making us buy different retailers....you know what screw it, I will rent it, and beat it within couple of days. Sorry but I am getting sick of different retailer BS now. 



 

CGI-Quality said:
radiantshadow92 said:

i would bet my life you guys wouldn't be complaining if the 360 was getting the content like it does almost all the time =l

That's usually the case with any exclusive content, the fans of the console that doesn't get it does the most complaining. In truth, I have no issue with the distatse for this type of thing, but then again it doesn't usually affect me because I own all 3 current gen systems.


I don't think i have ever complained about dlc on the other side because i know microsoft must have paid big bucks for it, just like Sony probably did in this case. Its not like the devs go "oh i like ps3 better so lets put it on there". They get paid and fair is fair. Plus, the dlc usually comes a few weeks after to all consoles so no biggie.



radiantshadow92 said:

i would bet my life you guys wouldn't be complaining if the 360 was getting the content like it does almost all the time =l


yeah, like batman arkham asylum, virtua tennis 4, tales of vesperia, mass effect 2... oh wait a sec...



Around the Network
gergroy said:
radiantshadow92 said:

i would bet my life you guys wouldn't be complaining if the 360 was getting the content like it does almost all the time =l


yeah, like batman arkham asylum, virtua tennis 4, tales of vesperia, mass effect 2... oh wait a sec...


We never even got tales in the west. And looks at who gets all the fallout and call of duty dlc early. Oh wait, and ME2 the whole freaking game early, and bioshock. I could go on. Like i said so it doesn't matter because everyone gets thier dlc in the end. No need to blame the devs for giving it to one party earlier. If you don't like (not you but anyone who doesn't like it), just buy all the systems.

 

(long list here)



FattyDingDong said:

because sony sold more rockstar games than microsoft


yeah overall but not this gen...maybe this will change after LA Noire & Agent...



Exclusive content is worse than timed exclusives.



Garnett said:
mibuokami said:

God how I hate this , not only are you making launch DLC but you're limiting them by both console AND by retailer? Fuck that shit.


I agree, But its probably some stupid shit that 99% of people wont use, like collectables.


but what about the jimmy addon for mafia 2 or the joker missions for batman, it was much much more playtime.

il be getting this on ps3 anyways, but im not a fan of exclusive dlc they should be the same



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

PureDante said:
Munkeh111 said:

It probably won't be anything too big, can't wait for the game though


Why do it for 360 and leave ps3 users in the dust?


Because somebody pays them