Played a good 13 hours before I gave up on it. However I am pushing myself to finish it because I heard the ending was pretty good.

But let me get to the point. I love the battle system to death in all 2.5 AC games. However, that means absolutely nothing to me if the story does not move forward. And what I mean by that is that I want a new hero/ancestor, new location, andnew historical events. I'm utterly disappointed with Brotherhood. It feels like a very lengthy DLC to AC2, which I loved to death.

6.5

7.7 / 10.0

Improved gameplay was nice but it seems that with every game, it's less about being an assassin and more about being an invincible killing machine. Rome was a nice place but by the time I finished the game, I was almost bored with having just one city. Story didn't progress all that much and it didn't feel like it could stand out on its own - at all. At least I got to play more as Desmond - and I didn't have to do it but whenever I wanted to, I wasn't restricted to simple walking around. Multiplayer has some nice ideas but I never liked it because it feels 'glitchy'. They should have focused more on single-player instead.

I think AC:B a game that gets worse instead of better as time passes. I still think AC2 is awesome but the more I think about AC:B, the more it feels like AC2.5 and in a way very incomplete. I've actually lowered the rating I gave it twice during writing this post.

@hatmoza: The ending is pretty important but I wouldn't call it good under any circumstances I think. But that's just my opinion.

9.1, I really enjoyed it, and really the strong nature of Rome. Everything was perfect but it felt more of the same, and that is why I am not giving it higher score. 

Vgchartz score -- 9.00

Gamerankings score 89.53%

Highest score was 10, lowest was 5