what difficlut issue? Its disgusting, its wrong, most of the time its agaisnt someone's will, and it can dangerously harm the child/baby

Sex against someone's will = sexual abuse.

Incest means sex with someone with whom you are realted too. If it's against someone's will then it's sexual abuse. If it's not (like this case), then I have a hard time finding a good reason why it should be illegal.

This happened in my city. *Super facepalm*

Well, lots of abused people stay quiet and dont really talk about it because of fear, so its hard to recognize when the sexual abuse is happening. In most incets cases I heard, the younger relative is usually the victim that doesnt really fight the abuser, mostl because of naive ignorance, shame or fear.

Shouldn't be illegal purely for the fact they're not hurting anyone and it's their own business what they get up too not anyone elses.

How funny a certain religious poster is against something that has NOTHING to do with him, just trying to dictate what other people do.

I actually think that's worse, than incest.

Machina just raised a good point, why are religious people SO obsessed with other peoples sex lives, and what they get up too. It's creepy.

Do as I say. Not as I do.

But that's sexual abuse, and not incest. Incest just implies 2 people that are related having sex. It says nothing about whether or not there is abuse, and in this particular case we are talkingh about there certainly is no abuse.

So we should simply be talking: is there something wrong with these two people (from the article) having such a relationship? Should it be illegal? Does that even make sense?

You don't think it counts as hurting the inbred child that they are going to have? Particularly when you accept that in certain communitiies, if you legalise it there will likely end up being more than a single generations worth of inbreeding.

As I said above, if they use condoms and are willing to get an abortion if the condom/pill/whatever fails, then they are hurting no-one

Same stance as all the people in africa having sex (obviously not ALL) but the ones passing on HIV ect ...

I personally think it's wrong to get pregnant when there is that strong possibility, at same time though, you can't hurt something that doesn't exist ...

And some would say every woman has a right to give life, black area I guess ...

@Scottie: Actually they are. Any abortion kills a human person. Doesn``t really if they are 1 second old or ready to come out, it``s still a person in there, therefore, that``s murder. But that``s my way of seeing things.

Back to topic, is it immoral? To me it is. He is the father and she is the daughter. Father and daughter are family, not lovers.
Do i find it strange for this to happen? In this case no. They never met each other; they had no bonds at all. But at the same time, they knew they were father and daughter, therefore i don``t really believe this love was so casual as any love that comes to be. Did they fought against it? Don``t know.