sapphi_snake on 10 April 2011
pizzahut451 said:
sapphi_snake said:
pizzahut451 said:
sapphi_snake said:
pizzahut451 said:
Isnt incest supposed to be illegal? If it isnt, it damn right should be !!!
|
It's a very difficult issue, that raises a lot of questions.
|
what difficlut issue? Its disgusting, its wrong, most of the time its agaisnt someone's will, and it can dangerously harm the child/baby
|
Sex against someone's will = sexual abuse.
Incest means sex with someone with whom you are realted too. If it's against someone's will then it's sexual abuse. If it's not (like this case), then I have a hard time finding a good reason why it should be illegal.
|
Well, lots of abused people stay quiet and dont really talk about it because of fear, so its hard to recognize when the sexual abuse is happening. In most incets cases I heard, the younger relative is usually the victim that doesnt really fight the abuser, mostl because of naive ignorance, shame or fear.
|
But that's sexual abuse, and not incest. Incest just implies 2 people that are related having sex. It says nothing about whether or not there is abuse, and in this particular case we are talkingh about there certainly is no abuse.
So we should simply be talking: is there something wrong with these two people (from the article) having such a relationship? Should it be illegal? Does that even make sense?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
