Still believe Will Smith is the best thing going in Hollywood right now.


(though Hanks is my favorite actor)

Seriously though, I Am Legend isn't original. Different compared to other movies out right now, but it just sounds like a combo of the two movies that came before it.

I thought this movie would be somewhat of a miss all because of the actor playing the lead, John C. Reilly.

He's a great actor, and he's been playing in a lot more comedic stuff, and he's great, but he was always the supporting character, not the lead.

 Oh my bad, i haven't seen the other 2 movies, so i consider it for myself original. Does that sound better?=)

I really believe that the name of a movie can affect it's box office and I think they chose a poor name for that movie.

i suppose in the sense of Apatows past yeah. but with a budget of 35 million http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=walkhard.htm (not sure where you got 70 million from) id hardly say it bombed. It will most likely recoup its budget in theaters and make Sony some nice dime from rentals and DVD/BD.

Now, Charlie wilsons War, tom Hanks, Julia roberts, Hoffman = 9 million weekend before xmas? Theres your bomb right there.

 You know what your correct. I could of swore I saw 70 million on wikipedia. So I guess its not that bad then.

I'm Interested in "I Am Legend". I've read the book, (one of my favourite of all time) but from what little I've seen of the trailers, the film appears to have a different setting, and some extra supernatural elements to it.

Invisible things?

Perhaps all will be explained when I go to see the film.

I heard that Arnold Schwarzenegger was originally planned for the role. It's a pity he didn't take it, I love that guy :D

 Nothing invisible.

The only supernatural element to the film is that the writer decided to make it a treatise about how we're killing God.  I was okay with the film until it started getting preachy.