ok...

I will just go cry in the corner then and get out of your way

people actually trust metacritic?

seriously... people actually take notice of user views? I personally don't take notice

Well, when the differences are so much they have to be taken notice. Pretty much everyone is flaming this game and its not even an exclusive so its not like someone has an agenda or something, besides there are some really good user reviews, especially from the PC gamers reviews on metacritics. They explain how many levels are re-used, and to me that's settled the decision. I won't be getting this game.

Reviews have been biased before for some games its no wonder some people think developers/publishers paid for it, Call of duty is the first one that comes to mind, this one feels suspiciously similar.

You forgot to include Xbox360 in there.

Crysis 2 PC version is also a port from its console counterpart.

i think reviews should stop giving scores all together.

1) Scores are impossible to compare with other games on the market. (you wouldnt compare a pc game do a ds game)

2) Scores are impossible to use as a comparison between games on the same platform. (you wouldnt compare halo to limbo)

3) Scores do not represent differences between an original game and its sequel. (ton of improved sequels getting lower scores than predecesor while other games are getting worse but are beating the scores of their predecessors)

they are good for nothing, have zero accuracy and all it leads to are rants.

i prefer reviewers telling us about the gameplay mechanics, basic plot (without spoilers) and show us the graphics....from that we can all decide our selves and there will be no need for biased comments or emotions and more importantly no randomly picked scores (because thats what they are....random, you cant convert qualitative information into numeric without bias)

Meh you overestimate Crysis. Most people only treated the first game as funny benchmark to measure computer power and almost noone cares about it as a game.

I've enjoyed DA1a lot on my PS3. However, after I saw the PC version, I was definitely disappointed with my purchase and I was planning to get the PC version this time. If they changed the interface to clone the console version, I can clearly understand why PC gamers will consider this game a rather poor sequel.

It makes much more sense that this game is just objectively bad. Occams razor folks.

False.  It's actually a pretty damn good shooter, and it's disappointing most people go into it expecting flashy graphics and nothing else.

OT:

Everything I've heard about DAII implies it's a lesser game compared to the original, even on consoles.  Making the PC version nothing more than a better looking console version makes it all the worse.

Though I'm not sure how true that is.