By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - HD consoles hit 100 million!

Cobretti2 said:
hikaruchan said:
Cobretti2 said:

PLEASE lame excuse why 3rd parties keep making games for 360/PS3.

Nintendo has always had shit third party support even when its capabilities matched the xbox last gen.

Having said that. I am happy my two hd consoles have reached the 100million milestone.


NINTENDO Famicom/NES and Super Famicom/SNES say hello!!


lol that was before they had any real competition. (WAITS FOR SEGA fans to flame me haha).

 

Gilgamesh said:
Cobretti2 said:

PLEASE lame excuse why 3rd parties keep making games for 360/PS3.

Nintendo has always had shit third party support even when its capabilities matched the xbox last gen.

Having said that. I am happy my two hd consoles have reached the 100million milestone.


Wait Xbox had all the third party support last gen? where was I??

The reason why Nintendo had "shit" third party support for the last TWO gens was because there console failed so bad compared to the PSOne and PS2 they had ALL the third party games. Before that with the NES and SNES the 3rd party games were all over Nintendo.

Unless your being sarcastic some way, if so I didn't notice.

 

I found N64 support wasn't too bad, Gamecube not too bad either. Wii is FAR WORST.

People really thing xbox had shit support? WOW I found it to be great, But I guess it all comes down to taste and I was comparing more so to Gamecube only than PS2.

Also everyone knwos the exucses they use they been mentioned to death over and over.

ie Only Nintendo games sell. etc..


Not here to flame you for the Sega comment. However, you do realize at one point Sega had a bigger market share right? I would call that some serious competition.



Around the Network

This generation didn't have two markets.

It was always Sony VS Microsoft vs Nintendo in the home console market.  Sony and Microsoft don't share profits or anything for that matter. 

It only started being called HD twins vs Nintendo when third partys were called out for not developing for the market leader.  For years third party developerds kept telling us ""Its all about the market leader!"" when why they didn't develop for Nintendo systems (which they were right)  and when that changed they stuck to there guns, called the Wii a fad and continued on.  Then the HD twins excuse was born when the Wii was breaking all sales records and theere were no third party blockbusters to be seen.  

We all know what happened next, they supported the PSP, PS3, 360 more over the Wii.  Nintendo doesn't do business like Sony and Microsoft, we know Microsoft and Sony throw down the big bucks for publishing, advertisement and development fees, while Nintendo....well just thinks its enough they have a system to develop for.  Nintendo can do that because they have big enough to support themselves.  Which they did.  

It could of being better this gen.  The Wii could of being the console where developers could experiment and create new ideas for less.  But Nintendo only looks out for itself.  Since the HD consoles cost a lot to develop only ideas that will make back profit need to be made, so the sequal driven, FPS saturation, multi platform begun.  The 3DS continues this trend when the first videos we get are of Capcom developers going ""Did you see those graphics bitch?"" and the majority of announcements are PORTS or sequals or console games. 

While this all happens we waste our time fighting over sales when we already know its already decided.  Nintendo won the console race, Microsoft spent billions and still just snagged second, Sony lost the market leadership to get Blu ray on the shelves, thats it, neither gained absolute control over the industry and thats good, so lets not waste our time over things we can't control and just play some team fortress 2....on PC oh course...with hats. 



I'm looking forward to the joint press release from Sony and Microsoft celebrating this landmark.



VGChartz

PS3 and Xbox 360 will sell 100 million units. i can see that the consoles are halfway of their lives.



Owner of PS1/PSOne , PS2 phat/slim  , PS3 phat/slim , PS Eye+Move and PSP phat/slim/brite/go (Sony)

The Official PS Vita Thread! Get all your latest PS Vita news here! Come join us!

 


Games4Fun said:
Cobretti2 said:
hikaruchan said:
Cobretti2 said:

PLEASE lame excuse why 3rd parties keep making games for 360/PS3.

Nintendo has always had shit third party support even when its capabilities matched the xbox last gen.

Having said that. I am happy my two hd consoles have reached the 100million milestone.


NINTENDO Famicom/NES and Super Famicom/SNES say hello!!


lol that was before they had any real competition. (WAITS FOR SEGA fans to flame me haha).

 

Gilgamesh said:
Cobretti2 said:

PLEASE lame excuse why 3rd parties keep making games for 360/PS3.

Nintendo has always had shit third party support even when its capabilities matched the xbox last gen.

Having said that. I am happy my two hd consoles have reached the 100million milestone.


Wait Xbox had all the third party support last gen? where was I??

The reason why Nintendo had "shit" third party support for the last TWO gens was because there console failed so bad compared to the PSOne and PS2 they had ALL the third party games. Before that with the NES and SNES the 3rd party games were all over Nintendo.

Unless your being sarcastic some way, if so I didn't notice.

 

I found N64 support wasn't too bad, Gamecube not too bad either. Wii is FAR WORST.

People really thing xbox had shit support? WOW I found it to be great, But I guess it all comes down to taste and I was comparing more so to Gamecube only than PS2.

Also everyone knwos the exucses they use they been mentioned to death over and over.

ie Only Nintendo games sell. etc..


Not here to flame you for the Sega comment. However, you do realize at one point Sega had a bigger market share right? I would call that some serious competition.

haha yer I know, I owned them myself. I use to be a bigger sega fan then nintendo.



 

 

Around the Network
Dinomax said:
hikaruchan said:

That's cool that both HD Consoles have solid a combined 100Million. I just wish people would stop combining them into one Console it is PS3 & XBOX 360 dam it!!!


Its done so they can still act like they got some kind of victory over Nintendo.

Well you guys win.  You hurt a billion dollar company, by combining sale numbers  of two competing companys on an internet forum.  You sure showed them.  *shakes fist* 

Looks to me like it's kinda hurt you.

By the way. Nice avatar.



                            

this is a clear proof of dominance of hd consoles to wii because nintendo will never reach 50% marketshare this gen in homeconsoles a lot of inintendo fanboys are hurt and when it comes to compare the dominance of Wii to PS2 the previous gen they all again hide in their caves



Carl2291 said:
Dinomax said:
hikaruchan said:

That's cool that both HD Consoles have solid a combined 100Million. I just wish people would stop combining them into one Console it is PS3 & XBOX 360 dam it!!!


Its done so they can still act like they got some kind of victory over Nintendo.

Well you guys win.  You hurt a billion dollar company, by combining sale numbers  of two competing companys on an internet forum.  You sure showed them.  *shakes fist* 

Looks to me like it's kinda hurt you.

By the way. Nice avatar.

Is saying that....leeegal?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Dinomax said:

This generation didn't have two markets.

It was always Sony VS Microsoft vs Nintendo in the home console market.  Sony and Microsoft don't share profits or anything for that matter. 

It only started being called HD twins vs Nintendo when third partys were called out for not developing for the market leader.  For years third party developerds kept telling us ""Its all about the market leader!"" when why they didn't develop for Nintendo systems (which they were right)  and when that changed they stuck to there guns, called the Wii a fad and continued on.  Then the HD twins excuse was born when the Wii was breaking all sales records and theere were no third party blockbusters to be seen.  

We all know what happened next, they supported the PSP, PS3, 360 more over the Wii.  Nintendo doesn't do business like Sony and Microsoft, we know Microsoft and Sony throw down the big bucks for publishing, advertisement and development fees, while Nintendo....well just thinks its enough they have a system to develop for.  Nintendo can do that because they have big enough to support themselves.  Which they did.  

It could of being better this gen.  The Wii could of being the console where developers could experiment and create new ideas for less.  But Nintendo only looks out for itself.  Since the HD consoles cost a lot to develop only ideas that will make back profit need to be made, so the sequal driven, FPS saturation, multi platform begun.  The 3DS continues this trend when the first videos we get are of Capcom developers going ""Did you see those graphics bitch?"" and the majority of announcements are PORTS or sequals or console games. 

While this all happens we waste our time fighting over sales when we already know its already decided.  Nintendo won the console race, Microsoft spent billions and still just snagged second, Sony lost the market leadership to get Blu ray on the shelves, thats it, neither gained absolute control over the industry and thats good, so lets not waste our time over things we can't control and just play some team fortress 2....on PC oh course...with hats. 

I'd agree with everything apart from the two markets.  From the evidence there has been - and still is although it's now blurry a bit - two distinct markets.  It's clear to me from the retailers I consult for that there are very few consumers walking into a store decided whether to get a Wii or a PS3 or a 360.

For the most part people buying a Wii are not evaluating it against anything else, certainly prior to Move/Kinect.  However people buying a PS3 otr 360 would often - although not always of course - be chosing between them.

Much as I hate metaphors and annalogies for this type of thing I can only think of the car market.  The HD consoles are like too almost identically spec'd 4 wheel off roaders, while the Wii is something totally different, like a 4 door saloon or whatever.

This is clear from their purchasing history, game libraries, etc.  At this point, the HD consoles are almost interchangable, you get one and you get 90% the same as if you'd got the other, from game titles, to Netflix to whatever.

The Wii is markedly different in game library and content and represents a different purchase.

But I agree on everything else pretty much in terms of how they got branded as they did, etc.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

darthdevidem01 said:

Is saying that....leeegal?

Probably not, is being mean to Nintendo a bannable offence?