dobby985 said: I'm behind 7 proxies. |
Lol at people thinking proxies are flawless. =D
dobby985 said: I'm behind 7 proxies. |
Lol at people thinking proxies are flawless. =D
Ssenkahdavic said: Dont blame Sony, blame the Judge |
This.
They have the PS Move and they haven't even touched it. Even when I explain to them that it's like a Wii only better (debateable, but I'm trying to get her excited), she doesn't even seem excited. So my next statement was, "Give it to me
Galaki said: Shit! Sony is going to ban me even I don't have a PS3 :( |
No it means Sony might sue anyone visiting his site or who searched youtube for videos that might "infringe their rights" for your console. I smell massive corruption here in the justice system. If they start suing anyone over this, or even aim to try to ban individuals from the PSN because they visited a website or watched a video, this questions how much a company can breach individual privacy in the United States of America.
Truly, I do not see how anyone visiting, viewing a video, or hell even downloading the hacks infringes Sony's rights. And no the ToS and EULA is not legally binding, according to Europe at least.
I for one say, can someone please blow Sony's HQ the flip up? Enough is enough.
let me guess, the judge is a republican?
Xen said:
It doesn't work like that. You have to be caught with some sorta homebrew running on your console to get banned. |
Actually, if you read the statement, they only want the IP as proof that Geohotz distribute materials that is consider illegal under the DMCA.
What the use with the material after that however... shiver me timber!
ssj12 said:
Truly, I do not see how anyone visiting, viewing a video, or hell even downloading the hacks infringes Sony's rights. And no the ToS and EULA is not legally binding, according to Europe at least. I for one say, can someone please blow Sony's HQ the flip up? Enough is enough.
let me guess, the judge is a republican? |
So, by that logic, it's safe to assume, watching the PS3 hack related video is like watching child porn, in that, they are both illegal.
mibuokami said:
Actually, if you read the statement, they only want the IP as proof that Geohotz distribute materials that is consider illegal under the DMCA. What the use with the material after that however... shiver me timber! |
Ummm... to whom are you replying? I did read the inital article.
Galaki said:
|
Jumping to conclusions much?
Please show me where its written that Sony is going to sue everyone who watched Geohotz videos.
Xen said:
Ummm... to whom are you replying? I did read the inital article. |
Gah, I was meant to quote the guy you were quoting rofl!