Mummelmann said:
1.) Metallicube: I ask again, why is the PS3 above the Wii? If it were simply software, things would be dead even or perhaps slightly in the Wii's favor. And since Nintendo's core titles both sell more and move more hardware (by your account, that is) the PS3 has had no advanatages through 2010 at all so the longterm momentum should be all but lost. No recent price cut, Slim version is getting old and no advantage in software. Mind you, the PS3 is down yoy as well but not anywhere near as much. If 3rd parties alone make and break a consoles sales, how could the Wii be the fastest selling console of all time at all? It never had good 3rd party support. Nintendo's own games did all the work? Fine, maybe they did, but that once again begets the question; why can't Mario Galaxy 2, Kirby, Donkey Kong, Wii Party and other games move any consoles? Games that sell several million are system sellers, don't even try to argue that if you want to imply that the likes of Red Dead Redemption is what kept the PS3 floating last year.
2.) To everyone saying "Its only one bad week, hold off on the doom!" Well, its actually the fourth consecutive week of bad sales and the yoy drop is increasing for every one of those four weeks and there is nothing to point to a change any time soon so its hardly one bad week drawn into question. When the PS3 had significant drops (roughly half of those the Wii is seeing now, before the Slim launch) there were many threads discussing it's fate and imminent death despite it being the 3rd place console all along, yet I didn't see any of you emerge in those to stem the tide of doom prophets. To simply brush of the decline from incredible domination to placing below both competitors as insignificant is a really strange thing to do. When exactly will there be cause for worry? What if it dropped to sub 100k levels (this is a very real possibility within a reasonable time window), would you still maintain that its okay since the last place console has posted worse numbers at its worst? This is misplaced logic, or lack of logic at all and it leads me to believe that people are still blinded by the likes of Reggie and actually think that Nintendo are immune to industry woes and the need to conform to markets to make headway.
Do let us know when the drops are worrying.
3.) PS: Don't call my rant "doom talk", there is currently no console that is doomed and the market leader can't be doomed at this point anyway. I'm simply curious as to why you won't see the possibility that this (low sales) could have a bad effect on Nintendo both in the present and in the future? Will 3rd parties be more inclined to aid them next generation when they let sales plummet and do nothing about it? Will investors be pleased that they have effectively dropped extremely in profits in just a year due to significantly lower sales and the fact that they are forced to lower their projections time and time again? I also find it funny that some would maintain that "The PS3 is still in more trouble than the Wii". Why? Its selling more without any good reason and is experiencing drops that are nowhere near as bad and has gone from being constantly third to approaching second and first in weekly numbers. The 360 is probably also in more trouble, despite being on top of the charts and moving software like hell. Here's a tip; don't let Malstrom do all your thinking and reasoing for you, it won't do you any good.
|
1.) How should I know? I do not work at Sony or Nintendo, nor am I an analyst. All we have is speculation, and that is all our rambling will ever be.
From MY perspective anyway, it is quite obvious why PS3 is about Wii; it is getting games while Wii is not. It is as simple as that. It is currently receiving the support of a dead console, thus is performs that way. Meanwhile the HD consoles are receiving the suppport of a thriving console, despite not necessarilly equating to that in overall sales. Wii may have the evergreens but it has virtually no significant titles released recently. The evergreens cannot carry a console alone forever. Wii is down farther YoY simply because it has further to go.
3rd parties alone do NOT make or break a console, particularly a Nintendo one. However, when Nintendo shifts focus to something like 3DS, then the lack of third party support suddenly becomes proplematic, because now you have essentially NO supply of new games to keep the console relevant. Once Nintendo goes back to releasing their own Wii games though (assuming they do), Wii sales will again pick up. Nintendo does not need 3rd parties necessarilly, but they do act as gap fillers, but now Nintendo has stopped making Wii games with no one to fill the gaps.
Wii sold record numbers because of the gaming phenomenons they've pumped out. Now, not only have they ceased creating the gaming phenomenons, but essentially stopped making Wii games altogether. The most relevant hardware mover since late 2009 was DKC, a solid and popular game, but nowhere near the selling power of NSMB. And I admit, I overestimated the game in this regard. The fact is, Wii had NO games near the power of Mario Kart, Wii Fit, NSMB, SSBB, or Wii Sports for all of 2010. This weakness hurt momentum. Remember, it's always GAMES first and foremost that move consoles. After all, that's why they exist isn't it?
2.) Here is when there is cause for worry; when a Wii's library gets replenished with solid games that appeal to a mass market, and STILL recieves these poor sales. In other words, when the quality of the library does not equate to the quality of sales. For the most part, the strength of Wii's releases has pretty much translated to equal sales, whether strong or weak.
If Wii STILL outsold PS3 despite PS3 currently getting 90% of the games, then it would be very worrysome for Sony. The current trends should not surprise you one bit if you open your eyes to what is happening in terms of its library.
3.) Of course there is the possibility of the momentum carrying in the future, but again, it is merely speculation. However, if you look at history, you see that every generation is a new start. Sony and Nintendo especially are aware of this. I find it funny that you mentioned third parties, because clearly it is a non issue to Nintendo. For one, third parties are going to do what they want no matter how successful Nintendo is. The Wii should be a lesson for that. Second, Nintendo has proven they do not need third parties, AS LONG AS they continue to release their own games (which now, they are not doing).
I'm still struggling to see your point in your "teh doomed!!!1" rant... Is it that Nintendo should get back to making games for Wii? IF so, I completely agree. But understand the reason they currently are not is because they are occupied with 3DS. Do you wish me to shrug my shoulder and say Nintendo is in the wrong and that they're in trouble?
Is your point that poor momentum will carry over to the next gen for Nintendo? Again, this is nothing but your own speculation, and I see little evidence of this coming to fruition as long as Nintendo continues to make games that appeal to the masses. And what about the invincible Sony's momentum? How do you think third parties will think about Sony going from a 150 million selling console to a 60-70 million console? Do you think third parties may see that as a red flag, especially with ever rising costs in hard economic times and Sony intent on going further into the red? Your speculation seems to have little evidence to support it, yet you keep going on about it, which tells me this is not neccessarilly what you THINK will happen to Nintendo, but what you WANT to happen. Do you really think Nintendo is going to rest on their laurels, either in this or the next gen?
Frankly, I'm a little insulted if you really think I can't think for myself. Maybe I like Malstrom's ideas because I truly believe they are the most accurate I've read? Perhaps you are allowing the industry jargon to influence YOUR opinion too much..