By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Uncharted 3 Vs Gears of War 3

 

Uncharted 3 Vs Gears of War 3

Uncharted 3 676 65.19%
 
Gears Of War 3 361 34.81%
 
Total:1,037
osamanobama said:
d21lewis said:

 

--And as far a presentation is concerned, I believe what I wrote.  When I bought Uncharted 1, it was because I had just bought a PS3 and I wanted a game that blew away what I'd seen on the 360.  U1 did that.  That 2007 game looked better than my beloved 2006 game.  My purchase was justified.  Then I got Gears of War 2.  That 2008 game looked better than my 2007 game.  Next, I got Uncharted 2.  That 2009 game looked better than my 2008 game.  This year, we have a 2011 game vs a 2011 game--for the first time, ever. 

Thing is, Leo-J made a thread a while back saying U1 looked better than any Xbox 360 game ever released.  He posted screen shots of U1 that looked better than U1 did running on my TV.  I had fond memories of Uncharted but I didn't believe it was as good as he led me to believe.  I wound up playing Uncharted again and my memories of that great game was destroyed.  It was easier for me to find flaws in that previously "flawless" game because, like Gears of War, the rest of the industry had caught up with the standard it had set.  2D plants and fire, janky animation, and weak textures suddenly stood out like a sore thumb.  Same thing when I went back and tried Uncharted 2 after I finished Mass Effect 2 last week.  It still looked good but I wasn't blown away by it anymore.  The story wasn't a big draw anymore because I knew how it played out.  The graphics weren't amazing because I had just finished God of War 3 (best looking console game on the market!).  I played until I got to the enemy camp and I turned the game off.  It just didn't have the power it had the year before.

Let's say that Uncharted 2 sets the standard and scores a 9 across the board.  There are games that score a 10 in character models but score a 7 in lighting.  There's games that score a 10 in lighting but score an 8 in animation.  They may not have the total package like Uncharted 2 did but after seeing certain games with better lighting, better animation, better environments, and such, going back and seeing poor textures in U2's character models or the environments take away from U2's awe factor.  Another example:  In 1994, Donkey Kong Country was the hands down best looking game on the market.  Looking back at it now, we're harder to impress.  It just looks like another 16-bit game, now.  It looks better than Sonic the Hedgehog 2, but not THAT much better.  I play so many games that I'm not as easily impressed anymore.  A game released in 2009, no matter how good, looks like a game released in 2009 to me.

--I keep playing Gears for the co-op.  I haven't played online in it since 2008.  I've NEVER tried Uncharted's online.  With Gears 3's promise of 4 player onlince co-op as well as split screen (I'm talking campaigns, here), a storyline told from multiple perspectives, Epic's statement that the game is DONE and they're just polishing it until release, and their history of providing totally unique (until somebody copies them) online vs modes, I'm more excited for GeoW3.  I'll definitely be buying Uncharted 3 and I can't wait to see the fire, sand, and flooding water stages running on my HDTV.  I just like the GeoW series in the past more than I've liked the Uncharted series and I'm more invested in the characters and the struggle of their world more than the struggle of Nathan Drake and his women.

All my opinion, of course.

 

perhaps you should read digital foundy's review of Uncharted 2 becuase no game looks better than it, other than maybe God of war 3, and now KZ3

Or perhaps you could just let it go.  No analysis of frame rates, screen tearing, or processing power is gonna convince me that Uncharted looks better than Super Street Figher or something.  I know what's pleasing to my eyes.



Around the Network
d21lewis said:

@MikeB, I won't go into a very long reply.  I'll just touch on a couple of things. 

-I personally feel like Gears of War's story was pretty refreshing--about a guy being forced into a position of leadership and putting together a team of reliable comrades after some of his team was killed.  Gears 2's story kicked it up to another level (because they hired some major comic book writers to build on Gears 1 and improve the pacing) but the universe was expanded upon, mysteries were revealed, and some surprise twists were thrown into them mix.  Why was the Locust queen human?  Who created the Sires?  Why were the Locusts warring among themselves?  What is Marcus Fenix's father's role in all of this?  Add to that little subplots about the Carmine family, Dominic and his wife, experimentations on humans, and the fall of mankinds last safe haven and for me, it was pretty compelling stuff.  I found myself wondering what was going to happen next through the whole thing. 

Uncharted 1 & 2 took a very predictable story but told it in a very compelling way.  I wasn't ever really surprised but the way its story was told was very satisfying.  The good guy characters were likeable and relateable and had very good chemistry.  I'd be lying if I didn't say that I wasn't smiling through the whole experience.  I guess, personally, I just liked the unfamiliar story of Gears and the feeling that I was always in over my head a bit more.

--As for Gears feeling a bit bulkier, I can agree.  But then again, you're controlling very big men carrying very big guns while wearing very big armor.  I guess it's supposed to feel a little hefty.  But when those bullets start flying, giant enemies are trying to flank you, flying enemies are dropping down on you, and the intensity ramps up, it's not so bad.  As for move sets, I guess Drake's repetoirre fits the kind of game he's in (an exploration game with a lot of gunplay) better just like Fenix's array of moves fits the kind of game he's in (a gritty war game with gritty gunplay).  You'd be surprised how much variety there is in GeoW2, though.  Every few minutes there was something new being thrown at you.  It never really had time to get stale.

--And as far a presentation is concerned, I believe what I wrote.  When I bought Uncharted 1, it was because I had just bought a PS3 and I wanted a game that blew away what I'd seen on the 360.  U1 did that.  That 2007 game looked better than my beloved 2006 game.  My purchase was justified.  Then I got Gears of War 2.  That 2008 game looked better than my 2007 game.  Next, I got Uncharted 2.  That 2009 game looked better than my 2008 game.  This year, we have a 2011 game vs a 2011 game--for the first time, ever. 

Thing is, Leo-J made a thread a while back saying U1 looked better than any Xbox 360 game ever released.  He posted screen shots of U1 that looked better than U1 did running on my TV.  I had fond memories of Uncharted but I didn't believe it was as good as he led me to believe.  I wound up playing Uncharted again and my memories of that great game was destroyed.  It was easier for me to find flaws in that previously "flawless" game because, like Gears of War, the rest of the industry had caught up with the standard it had set.  2D plants and fire, janky animation, and weak textures suddenly stood out like a sore thumb.  Same thing when I went back and tried Uncharted 2 after I finished Mass Effect 2 last week.  It still looked good but I wasn't blown away by it anymore.  The story wasn't a big draw anymore because I knew how it played out.  The graphics weren't amazing because I had just finished God of War 3 (best looking console game on the market!).  I played until I got to the enemy camp and I turned the game off.  It just didn't have the power it had the year before.

Let's say that Uncharted 2 sets the standard and scores a 9 across the board.  There are games that score a 10 in character models but score a 7 in lighting.  There's games that score a 10 in lighting but score an 8 in animation.  They may not have the total package like Uncharted 2 did but after seeing certain games with better lighting, better animation, better environments, and such, going back and seeing poor textures in U2's character models or the environments take away from U2's awe factor.  Another example:  In 1994, Donkey Kong Country was the hands down best looking game on the market.  Looking back at it now, we're harder to impress.  It just looks like another 16-bit game, now.  It looks better than Sonic the Hedgehog 2, but not THAT much better.  I play so many games that I'm not as easily impressed anymore.  A game released in 2009, no matter how good, looks like a game released in 2009 to me.

--I keep playing Gears for the co-op.  I haven't played online in it since 2008.  I've NEVER tried Uncharted's online.  With Gears 3's promise of 4 player onlince co-op as well as split screen (I'm talking campaigns, here), a storyline told from multiple perspectives, Epic's statement that the game is DONE and they're just polishing it until release, and their history of providing totally unique (until somebody copies them) online vs modes, I'm more excited for GeoW3.  I'll definitely be buying Uncharted 3 and I can't wait to see the fire, sand, and flooding water stages running on my HDTV.  I just like the GeoW series in the past more than I've liked the Uncharted series and I'm more invested in the characters and the struggle of their world more than the struggle of Nathan Drake and his women.

All my opinion, of course.

 

You basically touched on every reason why I like Gears of War better.  

If both released the same day and I only had enough money to get one it would be Gears of War 3.  Not that I wouldnt eventually get Uncharted, but thats just the way it is for me.



d21lewis said:
chris.m95 said:

How can anyone like uncharted i hate it!


And I guess I would be hypocritical if I didn't wag my finger at this post, too.  You do realize that it's possible for people to enjoy things that you don't, right?  Everyone has their opinion but can you deny that the Uncharted series is one of the best looking, smoothest playing, most polished games on the market?  I hate sports games but I can at least understand why some people love them.

Ok sorry that is harsh. Its just that from my opinion i find it hard to see how people could like the uncharted series. i never meant this to put anyone down it just confuses me as to how people like it.



Wait... does this mean im not human?

PSN addy - mrx95

A good head and a good heart are always a formidable combination. - Nelson Mandela

A radical is a man with his feet planted firmly in the air. - Franklin.D.Roosevelt

 

^ that's why uncharted 2 is the highest rated exclusive of the gen becuase it sucks!



chris.m95 said:
d21lewis said:
chris.m95 said:

How can anyone like uncharted i hate it!


And I guess I would be hypocritical if I didn't wag my finger at this post, too.  You do realize that it's possible for people to enjoy things that you don't, right?  Everyone has their opinion but can you deny that the Uncharted series is one of the best looking, smoothest playing, most polished games on the market?  I hate sports games but I can at least understand why some people love them.

Ok sorry that is harsh. Its just that from my opinion i find it hard to see how people could like the uncharted series. i never meant this to put anyone down it just confuses me as to how people like it.

You know to apologise, chris.m95. Me and hundreds of poeple will agree that uncharted is a good game. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that the game is bad. It is the highest rated PS3 exclusive and this shows that you are part of the very small minority that don't like Uncharted.



PLAYSTATION®3 is the future.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

PSN ID: Ferrari_1996

Around the Network

Uncharted 2 is a better shooter than Gears of War 2. Gears of War 1 was a better shooter than Uncharted 1. I'm confident in saying that Uncharted 3 will be a better shooter than Gears 3. Judging by the gameplay trailers, Gears 3 seems to be more Gears, which got boring towards the end of my second playthrough of Gears 2. Unless they can dramatically tighten up the gameplay, not make every enemy soak up as much bullets as an enemy from Uncharted 1 and actually add some versatility to the gameplay, then I'm confident in my statement. 

The way Drake manouvers between cover, runs, uses melee, uses stealth, uses platforming and uses the weapons, is near perfection as third person shooter. I played through it the first time by using a mixture of platforming, stealth and standard shooting, the second time I stried to strictly stick to using stealth and platforming and the third time I just went insane and used grenades, launchers and machine guns like a crazy person, without worrying about the loss of ammunition. All three times was fun and all three brought different challenges.

Gears 2 is awesome, but I felt like it's way to similar to Gears 1, which was amazing for a game made in 2006. The running, while looking cool, isn't useful at all. The cover mechanics are clumsy, the characters (their size is probably the reason) are too slow in their movement, the melee is repititive, the shooting is pretty good and the enemies soak up way too much damage without trying to out smart you. 

I'll be buying Gears of War 3 at release, but unless it fixes up the character dialogue, updates the cover and shooter mechanic, makes the story somewhat interesting and makes it look as good as Uncharted 2 (both in terms of art and technical prowess), then it will not be close to being my Game of the Year. That battle will be fought between Uncharted 3, Skyrim, Yakuza 4, Infamous 2 and the inevitable Alan wake 2.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

dsage01 said:

^ that's why uncharted 2 is the highest rated exclusive of the gen becuase it sucks!


Super Mario Galaxy & Super Mario Galaxy 2 have higher metascores.



Kynes said:
dsage01 said:

^ that's why uncharted 2 is the highest rated exclusive of the gen becuase it sucks!


Super Mario Galaxy & Super Mario Galaxy 2 have higher metascores.

That's not true at all. I can easily play both Galaxy games on my PC, so you are wrong sir. I said good day sir!



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Uncharted 3  .VS.  Gears of War 3  AND THE WINNER IS........... UNCHARTED WAR 3

PUBLISHER:  MICROSONY
DEVELOPER: EPIC DOG STUDIOS



Doobie_wop said:

Uncharted 2 is a better shooter than Gears of War 2. Gears of War 1 was a better shooter than Uncharted 1. I'm confident in saying that Uncharted 3 will be a better shooter than Gears 3. Judging by the gameplay trailers, Gears 3 seems to be more Gears, which got boring towards the end of my second playthrough of Gears 2. Unless they can dramatically tighten up the gameplay, not make every enemy soak up as much bullets as an enemy from Uncharted 1 and actually add some versatility to the gameplay, then I'm confident in my statement. 

The way Drake manouvers between cover, runs, uses melee, uses stealth, uses platforming and uses the weapons, is near perfection as third person shooter. I played through it the first time by using a mixture of platforming, stealth and standard shooting, the second time I stried to strictly stick to using stealth and platforming and the third time I just went insane and used grenades, launchers and machine guns like a crazy person, without worrying about the loss of ammunition. All three times was fun and all three brought different challenges.

Gears 2 is awesome, but I felt like it's way to similar to Gears 1, which was amazing for a game made in 2006. The running, while looking cool, isn't useful at all. The cover mechanics are clumsy, the characters (their size is probably the reason) are too slow in their movement, the melee is repititive, the shooting is pretty good and the enemies soak up way too much damage without trying to out smart you. 

I'll be buying Gears of War 3 at release, but unless it fixes up the character dialogue, updates the cover and shooter mechanic, makes the story somewhat interesting and makes it look as good as Uncharted 2 (both in terms of art and technical prowess), then it will not be close to being my Game of the Year. That battle will be fought between Uncharted 3, Skyrim, Yakuza 4, Infamous 2 and the inevitable Alan wake 2.


Science would tell you that someone's head can only explode once.  After that, they would be headless with no head left to explode.  I'm here to tell you that science is stupid.  My head exploded at least five times while reading that post.  I'm typing this reply withot a head (that's why I just mispelled "without", btw), eyes, or lips.