By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What is your most hated movies?

Donnie Darko. Everyone and their mother told me how great this movie was, and Netflix was all like, "Hey, if you liked Memento, you'll love this shit!" I fucking loathed every second of it and haven't spoken to anyone who had recommended it to me since (because I brutally murdered them all).



Around the Network
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.



Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

HBP is the only one I didn't like. Oh my god they ruined the best book's movie!!!

OOT was above expectations for me since that the only book I didn't like but the movie was so well paced so it wasn't boring like the book. But yeah GOF is probably the best.

but ultimately Philosophers Stone probably had the biggest impact on me, since it got me to read the books and its the one I've seen most.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

It's pretty hard to adapt most books witout the movie seeming like it's been editet out and missing parts. Adapting a book is hard, and when the succes of the movie is guaranteed (like in the case of the Harry Potter movies) oftentimes film makers won't put enough effort into it. Kinda the same reason why so many licensed video games suck.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:
Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

It's pretty hard to adapt most books witout the movie seeming like it's been editet out and missing parts. Adapting a book is hard, and when the succes of the movie is guaranteed (like in the case of the Harry Potter movies) oftentimes film makers won't put enough effort into it. Kinda the same reason why so many licensed video games suck.

Then they damn well should. Not comparing LOTR with HP here, but LOTR movies certainly lived up to the books.

@darth: reverse for me. Books first!



Around the Network
Xen said:
sapphi_snake said:
Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

It's pretty hard to adapt most books witout the movie seeming like it's been editet out and missing parts. Adapting a book is hard, and when the succes of the movie is guaranteed (like in the case of the Harry Potter movies) oftentimes film makers won't put enough effort into it. Kinda the same reason why so many licensed video games suck.

Then they damn well should. Not comparing LOTR with HP here, but LOTR movies certainly lived up to the books.

@darth: reverse for me. Books first!

LOTR movies surpassed the books. *trollface.jpg*



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Xen said:

Then they damn well should. Not comparing LOTR with HP here, but LOTR movies certainly lived up to the books.


Or they were actually better since they cut parts that were totally irrelevant to the general plot (I'm looking at you, Tom Bombadil).

Point is, you can do a book adaptation fine if you want, for example, yesterday I watched The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo after having read the book, they adapted a 600 page book into a 150 minute film perfectly, everything that happens in the film happens in the book, sure, some parts were shortened, but the essence of every scene was kept intact. That's how an adaptation should be. When you gotta make up parts that weren't in the book to justify your plot, you're messing up a bit the adaptation




darthdevidem01 said:
Xen said:
sapphi_snake said:
Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

It's pretty hard to adapt most books witout the movie seeming like it's been editet out and missing parts. Adapting a book is hard, and when the succes of the movie is guaranteed (like in the case of the Harry Potter movies) oftentimes film makers won't put enough effort into it. Kinda the same reason why so many licensed video games suck.

Then they damn well should. Not comparing LOTR with HP here, but LOTR movies certainly lived up to the books.

@darth: reverse for me. Books first!

LOTR movies surpassed the books. *trollface.jpg*

What do you know :P



Xen said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Xen said:
sapphi_snake said:
Xen said:
zexen_lowe said:
Smeags said:
zexen_lowe said:

War of the Worlds (the Tom Cruise one)

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Cloverfield

The Mask of Zorro

 

That's what I can think of right now, I dislike a lot of movies, but those are the ones I truly hate

Prisoner of Azkaban is an interesting choice, as a lot of people like it the best (not my personal favorite, that's Half-Blood Prince... Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows part 1 were great as well).

The people who like it usually didn't read the book, maybe it's fine if you didn't, but if you did it completely shat on it. They have almost nothing in common

All the HP movies are absolute shit sans The Goblet of Fire. That one is decent.

I don't understand how can they fuck up so badly with such good material. Prisoner is especially shitty.

It's pretty hard to adapt most books witout the movie seeming like it's been editet out and missing parts. Adapting a book is hard, and when the succes of the movie is guaranteed (like in the case of the Harry Potter movies) oftentimes film makers won't put enough effort into it. Kinda the same reason why so many licensed video games suck.

Then they damn well should. Not comparing LOTR with HP here, but LOTR movies certainly lived up to the books.

@darth: reverse for me. Books first!

LOTR movies surpassed the books. *trollface.jpg*

What do you know :P

True I only read the first 100 pages of the book before dozing off!



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

darthdevidem01 said:

True I only read the first 100 pages of the book before dozing off!


To be fair, the first of the six books (that is, the first part of The Fellowship) is frankly horrible and sleep-inducing, it gets much better once they reach Rivendell