By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - PS3 reaches 1.1M units Down Under.

D-Joe on 11 February 2011
ethomaz said:
D-Joe said:
http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_Seventh_generation

That is what I found but there are just sales at Nov 2010 combined... I will sum the others months late.

is that really hard

http://vgsales.wikia.com/wiki/NPD_December_2010



http://zh-tw.justin.tv/johndoe1899

Around the Network
DonFerrari on 11 February 2011
Grooski said:
4k1x3r said:
postofficebuddy said:

850k 360s sold at the end of 2009 is shipments.

Australia, end of 2009:

 

PS3 .............783,189
PSP.............607,168
PS2 .........2,555,641
Xbox 360..814,261
DS .............2,571,381
Wii.............1,737,090
Xbox..........842,003

 

 

New Zealand, end of 2009:

 

 

PS3..............117,000
PSP ............165,000
PS2...........534,000
360............140,000
DS ................93,000
Wii................94,000

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=107096

So between Australia and NZ PS3 is probably around 1.3 million now. Although keep in mind vgc doesn't track the PS3s given away free with Bravias, I'm not sure exactly how many that is though. The fact that MS declined to comment about total sales despite the fact that they've been happy to do so in the past probably means that gfk has PS3 ahead now.

 

10k..

Over 160k.


 


you are wrong... it's over 9 thousand.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

justinian on 11 February 2011
ethomaz said:
justinian said:
ethomaz said:
D-Joe said:
ethomaz said:
Xbox 360: March 23, 2006
PlayStation 3: March 23, 2007

360 had one year ahead... and Australia never was a 360 land... there are just two 360 lands: US and UK.

do more research or if you just talking about big markets

By VGC.

Total = 360 land (because US and UK)
America = 360 land (because US only)
Japan = PS3 land
Total Others = PS3 land (because all except UK)
UK = 360 land
France = PS3 land
Germany = PS3 land
Spain = PS3 land
Italy = PS3 land
Scandinavia = tie
Other Europe = PS3 land
Australia = tie
Other = PS3 land

So give another 360 land???

Although this doesn't give the number of units sold, MS sold £232M of x360s in 2010 and Sony sold £229M of PS3s.

Even with the x360 being cheaper I don't see this as a massive sales gap.

Yes, x360 wins UK but it is no way as decisive as PS3 in Japan or X360 in NA.

 

http://www.itproportal.com/2011/01/06/xbox-360-uk-sales-top-sony-ps3-2010/

Lifetime sales in UK was:

PS3: 3,841,121
360: 6,119,172

Seems the same proportion to US gap (3:2 360:PS3).

PS. 360 doesn't exists in Japan... (5:1 PS3:360)


Yep, that's true. What I wrote didn't quite come accross as I meant it (I am at work and while it is a pretty slow Friday still trying to juggle between here and vgcharts).

I could still be wrong but I was basing my figures on 2010 and trying to make the point that x360 did not outsell PS3 by a whooping great a margin in UK.



Kasz216 on 11 February 2011
Carl2291 said:
Kasz216 said:

It's not like they don't count it because don't want to.  They don't count it because there is no way to track it.

Up until GFK announced how many were given away, how would VGchartz have tracked that?  It's not like they have TV sales trackers.

I mean... common sense here.

It's the same reason those Burger King giveaway games didn't get tracked.

Someone just pointed out. There was an online tracker saying how many had been gone.

And even then, now that Gfk have said how many there were, there is no reason to not adjust accordingly, is there?


And as like somebody stated... those weren't the only PS3's given away.  As for adjustments, you know... it's been what 2-3 freakin days?

Seriously?



Carl on 11 February 2011
Kasz216 said:

And as like somebody stated... those weren't the only PS3's given away.  As for adjustments, you know... it's been what 2-3 freakin days?

Seriously?

Where did I say there should be an adjustment right this second?



                            

Around the Network
Kasz216 on 11 February 2011
Carl2291 said:
Kasz216 said:

And as like somebody stated... those weren't the only PS3's given away.  As for adjustments, you know... it's been what 2-3 freakin days?

Seriously?

Where did I say there should be an adjustment right this second?

The very post I replied too where you were bitching about them not adjusting it yet? 

People blasting Vgchartz for shit they couldn't track and they stated as such is really silly.

Afterall, that is the whole issue here.   The first guy I replied too was basically complaining that Vgchartz was off when there was a lot of stuff notcovered by Vgchartz due to lack of presense.



Carl on 11 February 2011
Kasz216 said:

The very post I replied too where you were bitching about them not adjusting it yet? 

People blasting Vgchartz for shit they couldn't track and they stated as such is really silly.

Afterall, that is the whole issue here.   The first guy I replied too was basically complaining that Vgchartz was off when there was a lot of stuff notcovered by Vgchartz due to lack of presense.

Link me to it please. I really don't remember saying it at all.

VGChartz should asjust accordingly. Right now? Of course not. As soon as possible? Yes.

If Brett wants people to get VGC Pro then people will want the data to be as up to date as possible. And it's not just HW that needs fixing...



                            

Kasz216 on 12 February 2011
Carl2291 said:
Kasz216 said:

The very post I replied too where you were bitching about them not adjusting it yet? 

People blasting Vgchartz for shit they couldn't track and they stated as such is really silly.

Afterall, that is the whole issue here.   The first guy I replied too was basically complaining that Vgchartz was off when there was a lot of stuff notcovered by Vgchartz due to lack of presense.

Link me to it please. I really don't remember saying it at all.

VGChartz should asjust accordingly. Right now? Of course not. As soon as possible? Yes.

If Brett wants people to get VGC Pro then people will want the data to be as up to date as possible. And it's not just HW that needs fixing...

It's literally the post I was replying to there.  Where you said "Shouldn't they adjust it".   As if they aren't going to adjust it or something.

This just happened 2-3 days ago... and even then Brett has to check the validity of their methods himself before adjusting.



Carl on 12 February 2011
Kasz216 said:

It's literally the post I was replying to there.  Where you said "Shouldn't they adjust it".   As if they aren't going to adjust it or something.

This just happened 2-3 days ago... and even then Brett has to check the validity of their methods himself before adjusting.

So where did I say right now? Adjust it. Yes. Right now? No.



                            

Kasz216 on 12 February 2011
Carl2291 said:
Kasz216 said:

It's literally the post I was replying to there.  Where you said "Shouldn't they adjust it".   As if they aren't going to adjust it or something.

This just happened 2-3 days ago... and even then Brett has to check the validity of their methods himself before adjusting.

So where did I say right now? Adjust it. Yes. Right now? No.

When you disagreed with me as to why there weren't adjustments yet and why the numbers aren't exactly right.

Which you know, was the guys problem.

In otherwords.  From the very beggining of your disagreeing with me when I explained to him why the numbers were off.