By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Over-priced DLC (Specifically Call of Duty 1st Strike)

Yep, its overpriced. Not much we can do about it besides not buy it.

 

Like how is the retail game $60 which is something like 12 (give or take a couple) online maps, 2 zombies maps, dead ops arcade, full single player and of course the online mode in general...but for $15 more all you get is 4 new maps and a zombies map? It should be $10 max.



Around the Network

Publishers are having trouble making money so they make optional downloads for pay to help cover costs and people complain.  Why?  It's optional and people think it's worth it to them to buy it.  You don't think it's worth it so don't buy it which is fine, I don't find the map packs worth it.  People complaining about optional downloads are annoying.  Would you rather game prices go up?  I get the complaints of DLC on story missions to an extent, but I've never played a game that I didn't think the DLC I bought was worth it.  I've bought all the DLC's for Mass Effect, Borderlands, and Dragon Age because I thought they were worth, but I would rather it be free. 

Gamers complain way to much and it's really turning me off to all  gaming websites.  Instead of discussing games and content and news, we bitch about Pacther and say reviews are biased.  I don't get how people find that fun to read and how people think anybody cares.  Some random guy hates IGN, why would anybody care?



Companies with stupid customers will routinely rip off their customers. Look at Apple, they release gimped versions of their shit then release the version 2 of that shit with *some* of the upgrades that should have been in there in the first place. Same with this map pack garbage. The days of game companies run by programmers and gamers themselves that care about being happy with releasing a full games to customers is long gone. Its all run by businessmen who do everything they can to get as much as money as possible while offering as little value as possible.

 

edit: To people saying that these optional downloads are to help cover costs of the game, you probably shouldnt post that opinion in a thread about one of the best selling games of the generation selling DLC for more than what comparable games sell them for. Save that for bombs like Enslaved or something like that.



Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.

Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.

-Jim Sterling

CDiablo said:

Companies with stupid customers will routinely rip off their customers. Look at Apple, they release gimped versions of their shit then release the version 2 of that shit with *some* of the upgrades that should have been in there in the first place. Same with this map pack garbage. The days of game companies run by programmers and gamers themselves that care about being happy with releasing a full games to customers is long gone. Its all run by businessmen who do everything they can to get as much as money as possible while offering as little value as possible.

 

edit: To people saying that these optional downloads are to help cover costs of the game, you probably shouldnt post that opinion in a thread about one of the best selling games of the generation selling DLC for more than what comparable games sell them for. Save that for bombs like Enslaved or something like that.

Not everyone is saying it's to cover the cost of the game, it's to cover costs of being a company as a whole.  Activision sells it DLC at a premium because they know it will sell and that DLC helps cover costs of another game that didn't make money.  Look at the company as a whole, not just a single game.



NiKKoM said:

I rather see more paid DLC  then jacking up the price of a retail game.. cause this gen shows that gaming isn't a healthy business.. it's incredible that not more developers and publishers haven't gone out of business.. if paid DLC fails expect games to sell at 100 dollars plus.. so buy more.. safe our future..

I think DLC is ruining retail games. Halo Reach for example, it had 13 maps, which is decent. However 4 or 5 of those maps were remade maps from older games, and the others were campaign levels.

I don't mind DLC, and acheivements/trophies based on DLC, I just hate how they eventually match the price of the game. I never buy games new, so I almost always miss out on CoD because it's soo expensive.

Fallout is also another example, Fallout 3 was great, and I plan to get New Vegas, but only the GOTY edition cause I'm not paying $140 for 1 game.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network
Cross-X said:

You see remember how last year MW2 sold 4 new Maps for $15? There was massive outrage about it and IW simply defended the price by saying it was worth it...

It broke XBL and PSN records as the fastest selling piece of DLC.

Even I find it bullshit that IW and now Treyarch are charging big prices for a few maps but it cant be helped when everyone saw the MW2 Map packs sell like hotcakes at a ridiculous price and since Black Ops is going so strong, people will buy the pack for $15 and Activision will rake in all the money. Telling forum members not to support isn't gonna change anything.

If the DLC enhances or extends my fun for the game ie Dragon Age, Mass Effect style DLC, then I shall consider buying it because I know it'll be worth the money I put into it. But if it's just some level pack or a weapon pack or simply a few skins and the devs sell it for $5-10 then that's just bullshit and I dont buy.

I for one don't buy any DLC at all but that's gonna change when Marvel VS Capcom 3. When they announce characters I want for DLC, I will not hesitate to buy them.

 

I'm the same way, except I'm not a fan of Fighting games, but Gears of War has me on a chockhold.

It's just stupid how the mega franchises can get away with charging soo damn much, and Activision in particular never makes a map pack or a GOTY edition. Halo neither, but Gears, and Fallout always have a hardcopy expansion, and Mass Effect is just awesome.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

mantlepiecek said:

DLC like extra levels should always be free, PC gaming has been like this since ages. Even Assassins Creed Brotherhood has free DLCs, I approve of that.

If its not free I ain't getting them.

Free DLCs definitely help to increase a game's longevity, eg. Gears of War 1, it had free DLCs and I loved it so much.

Gears 2 automatically sucked and although I got free DLCs for it(GOTY version), it wasn't worth it at all. But that's a different issue.

 

CoD is for people who don't care about money. So, the first place where CoD will perish will be the PC.

Gears 1 only had free DLC after a set period of charge time. THAT I 100% AGREE WITH.

Even a severe price reduction is awesome. PGR4 Challenge Pack is only 80MP($1.20) now, down from 400MP ($6).

I just wish Activision and Bungie did this, but it seems with the mega franchises, this is never the case. Except for a few "Deal of the Week" offers way down the road.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Mr Puggsly said:

If a game has pay DLC that adds hours of entertainment I don't mind paying for it.

It should also be noted that games today have more value than past gens regardless if you choose to purchase DLC.

I just hate when games don't feel complete unless you get the DLC. For example Fallout 3 continued the story with DLC, but I feel the story should end with actual game. Dragon Age did the same and whored DLC within the game which was annoying.

Modern games adding hours of entertainment these days is only contributable to Online play. I played as much Goldeneye as I did any FPS this gen, and I definatly played more Mario Kart 64 then Forza, GT, and current Mario Kart combined.

Without online, outside the RPG kingdom, games are getting shorter. FPS's used to last 15 hours, now they last 4-5, and to make up for that they add insane difficulty setting to make up for it.

I'm only complaining about the cost of this DLC. $18 for a few maps? This is not something that really adds to the game, I just want 1 more zombie map, and space monkeys, for an affordable price.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

CDiablo said:

Companies with stupid customers will routinely rip off their customers. Look at Apple, they release gimped versions of their shit then release the version 2 of that shit with *some* of the upgrades that should have been in there in the first place. Same with this map pack garbage. The days of game companies run by programmers and gamers themselves that care about being happy with releasing a full games to customers is long gone. Its all run by businessmen who do everything they can to get as much as money as possible while offering as little value as possible.

 

edit: To people saying that these optional downloads are to help cover costs of the game, you probably shouldnt post that opinion in a thread about one of the best selling games of the generation selling DLC for more than what comparable games sell them for. Save that for bombs like Enslaved or something like that.

I 100% agree, this is CoD, all they do is add levels and change the story. DLC only costs this much because they know they can sell it for this much. Nothing againt DLC, just over-priced DLC.

P.S. iPad = Tablet PC with flash memory. Not worth $500. I really hate Apple now cause my Iphone is broken only after 1 year. Android is the way to go.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

I really don't like COD map packs, without the older maps in Stimulus and the other w/e it's called pack, there only would have been one DLC pack consisting of new maps. Salvage and Bailout are the shittest maps I have ever played, out of the Stimulus pack the only "alright" map was Crash. I can't justify paying £10 for one map. I personally wasn't stupid enough to buy it, a fair few friens of mine were though, so I laughed at them.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.