By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Should People Take Justice Into Their Own Hands (partocular case)

 

Should People Take Justice Into Their Own Hands (partocular case)

Yes 48 57.83%
 
No 32 38.55%
 
Total:80

If people did that it would be a constant war between them.

There is no judge in a system like that, one of the parts becomes the "judge" and that cant be reliable, no matter how hard people try to push it because of particular cases, order must not be lost if we want to live in civilization.

Now, I wont say it wouldnt make me happy to have some sort of Batman or stuff like that, but those are just cartoons and comics, not reality.



Around the Network

Anyway, we have to look at this on 2 points:

1) Considering a civilized society would accept this is something I consider stupid, for the reasons in the post above.

2) Thats a whole different thing to having an opinion on what should have happened in a case like the one you described, in which I have no opinion since I dont know enough about to make a statement. You can disagree with the judge final sentence , you can argue if the system grants the accused and condemned too many things and such, but stating something like taking justice by our own hand is just too much, I think emotion has blinded you here.



It's so much cleaner when the arresting officer catches the douche bags red handed and blows their brains out 



rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:

If we give up on the idea of rehabilitation, our entire concept of justice and imprisonment may as well be thrown out the window.

What those kids did to that toddler was terrible but it must be kept in mind that they were children themselves. Advocating the murder of children in response to their misguided thought processes is just as repulsive as the atrocities they committed.

So what if they were children? They behaved worse than adults, and they still continue to behave that way today. Maybe killing them is too much, but a lifetime of solitary confinement is ver appropriate I think. Got any better solutions?

Any attempt to rehabilitate a ten year old mind is always a better option than locking it up and throwing away the key. Ten year olds can't fully distinguish right from wrong and do not have the emotional capacity to fully understand their actions. These children were obviously disturbed but that doesn't give a self-proclaimed "progressive" society the right to just cast them aside and try to forget about them.

If we stop trying to rehabilitate the causes of criminal activity, there's no point in continuing down this path. Just shoot everyone who commits a crime in the head and be done with it.

I, for one, would like to think that in the year of 2011, we're better than that as a people.

I think it's one of the self-proclaimed "progressive" society you talk about's faults that they think "rehabilitation" is a solution to this. It's a typical situation of turning the bullies into victims, and abandoning the real victims.

Those two knew very well what they were doing. They never to this day shoed any remorse for what thety did. One of them is even back in jail for peadophilia activities. The only thing these two deserve is to be punished. "Rehabilitation" should be reserved for the situations where someone who commits a small crime (like someone who steals because they come from a poor background) can be brought on the right path and prevent them from commiting bigger crimes. Someone who cold kills an infant in cold blood doesn't deserve "rehabilitation". All they deserve is punishment, not a pat on the back for their acts, like these two got.

Yes, because punishment works so well. It's been tested time and time again how well difficult living conditions, unsafe environments, and punishment squashes the impetus for future criminal activity.

Oh, wait. No, it doesn't.

You can go ahead and believe in your Draconian prison policy but it's been done that way since the beginning of recorded human history and has proven time and time again that it doesn't appear to deter criminal activity in the slightest bit.

They were. ten. years. old. Should they have been locked up for longer? Sure, that's a possibility. Should they have received better psychological treatment and evaluation? Almost assuredly. But to advocate giving up on children and throwing them in prison for life is a rash and emotion-driven response to what could be a fixable problem.

They did something terrible. It can certainly be labaled an "atrocity"They don't deserve a second chance, and no one who does what they did deserve a second chance. They weren't children, they were monsters. Their existence isn't encessary in society, quite the contrary. So locking them up in sokitary confinement isn't a problem.

I'm pretty sure you think pampering criminals and spitting in the face of their victims and in the face of law abiding citizens, will definately fix things. I mean just look at how well that worked out: one of them has physically assaulted several people sicne he's gotten out, and has been caught with child pornography on his PC. And who knows what the other one has done, but has managed to cover up (he was the smart, cold and calculated one of the two, so he probably does his best to not get caught).

Maybe you'll wake up one day, though I think you'll have to learn a lesson the hard way.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Kasz216 said:


All i'm going to say is... Romanian Liberalism is weird.

So much like Neo Conservatism it isn't funny.

There isn't really any actual left wing over here. I'm probably one of the most left wing people in Romania.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:

If we give up on the idea of rehabilitation, our entire concept of justice and imprisonment may as well be thrown out the window.

What those kids did to that toddler was terrible but it must be kept in mind that they were children themselves. Advocating the murder of children in response to their misguided thought processes is just as repulsive as the atrocities they committed.

So what if they were children? They behaved worse than adults, and they still continue to behave that way today. Maybe killing them is too much, but a lifetime of solitary confinement is ver appropriate I think. Got any better solutions?

Any attempt to rehabilitate a ten year old mind is always a better option than locking it up and throwing away the key. Ten year olds can't fully distinguish right from wrong and do not have the emotional capacity to fully understand their actions. These children were obviously disturbed but that doesn't give a self-proclaimed "progressive" society the right to just cast them aside and try to forget about them.

If we stop trying to rehabilitate the causes of criminal activity, there's no point in continuing down this path. Just shoot everyone who commits a crime in the head and be done with it.

I, for one, would like to think that in the year of 2011, we're better than that as a people.

I think it's one of the self-proclaimed "progressive" society you talk about's faults that they think "rehabilitation" is a solution to this. It's a typical situation of turning the bullies into victims, and abandoning the real victims.

Those two knew very well what they were doing. They never to this day shoed any remorse for what thety did. One of them is even back in jail for peadophilia activities. The only thing these two deserve is to be punished. "Rehabilitation" should be reserved for the situations where someone who commits a small crime (like someone who steals because they come from a poor background) can be brought on the right path and prevent them from commiting bigger crimes. Someone who cold kills an infant in cold blood doesn't deserve "rehabilitation". All they deserve is punishment, not a pat on the back for their acts, like these two got.

Yes, because punishment works so well. It's been tested time and time again how well difficult living conditions, unsafe environments, and punishment squashes the impetus for future criminal activity.

Oh, wait. No, it doesn't.

You can go ahead and believe in your Draconian prison policy but it's been done that way since the beginning of recorded human history and has proven time and time again that it doesn't appear to deter criminal activity in the slightest bit.

They were. ten. years. old. Should they have been locked up for longer? Sure, that's a possibility. Should they have received better psychological treatment and evaluation? Almost assuredly. But to advocate giving up on children and throwing them in prison for life is a rash and emotion-driven response to what could be a fixable problem.

They did something terrible. It can certainly be labaled an "atrocity"They don't deserve a second chance, and no one who does what they did deserve a second chance. They weren't children, they were monsters. Their existence isn't encessary in society, quite the contrary. So locking them up in sokitary confinement isn't a problem.

I'm pretty sure you think pampering criminals and spitting in the face of their victims and in the face of law abiding citizens, will definately fix things. I mean just look at how well that worked out: one of them has physically assaulted several people sicne he's gotten out, and has been caught with child pornography on his PC. And who knows what the other one has done, but has managed to cover up (he was the smart, cold and calculated one of the two, so he probably does his best to not get caught).

Maybe you'll wake up one day, though I think you'll have to learn a lesson the hard way.

Yes, I'm the one who needs to wake up. Obviously, this was a failure on the part of the state... or maybe you missed my point that it's pretty obvious those kids needed better psychological evaluations before being released into public. I'm not even against stricter punishment than what they received (especially when coupled with their obvious lack of quality psychiatric care during imprisonment). What I AM against is locking them up and throwing away the key without ANY attempts to understand WHY they did what they did and what environment led them to such an act.

It's very possible that they were just sociopaths without any kind of empathy or regard to human life, in which case they should be in a secure mental institution for the rest of their lives, not prison. Either way, they shouldn't be released back into public. On the other hand, they could have been abused badly as children and there could be hope of rehabilitation there and someday, they could become a productive member of society. I don't know the situation and you don't, either. The difference between us is that I think it's the state's job to find out and you think it's okay to either lock them away or just kill them outright without trying to find out WHY this happened. Progress is made through attempts to understand why things happen and how to prevent them in the future, not by playing the role of ostrich and hiding away all the bad things in life.

Then again, after reading your bizarre arguments on gun ownership, I'm not quite sure you have that solid a grasp on reality and feed off emotional responses and knee-jerk reactions to complicated situations.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:

They did something terrible. It can certainly be labaled an "atrocity"They don't deserve a second chance, and no one who does what they did deserve a second chance. They weren't children, they were monsters. Their existence isn't encessary in society, quite the contrary. So locking them up in sokitary confinement isn't a problem.

I'm pretty sure you think pampering criminals and spitting in the face of their victims and in the face of law abiding citizens, will definately fix things. I mean just look at how well that worked out: one of them has physically assaulted several people sicne he's gotten out, and has been caught with child pornography on his PC. And who knows what the other one has done, but has managed to cover up (he was the smart, cold and calculated one of the two, so he probably does his best to not get caught).

Maybe you'll wake up one day, though I think you'll have to learn a lesson the hard way.

Yes, I'm the one who needs to wake up. Obviously, this was a failure on the part of the state... or maybe you missed my point that it's pretty obvious those kids needed better psychological evaluations before being released into public. I'm not even against stricter punishment than what they received (especially when coupled with their obvious lack of quality psychiatric care during imprisonment). What I AM against is locking them up and throwing away the key without ANY attempts to understand WHY they did what they did and what environment led them to such an act.

It's very possible that they were just sociopaths without any kind of empathy or regard to human life, in which case they should be in a secure mental institution for the rest of their lives, not prison. Either way, they shouldn't be released back into public. On the other hand, they could have been abused badly as children and there could be hope of rehabilitation there and someday, they could become a productive member of society. I don't know the situation and you don't, either. The difference between us is that I think it's the state's job to find out and you think it's okay to either lock them away or just kill them outright without trying to find out WHY this happened. Progress is made through attempts to understand why things happen and how to prevent them in the future, not by playing the role of ostrich and hiding away all the bad things in life.

Then again, after reading your bizarre arguments on gun ownership, I'm not quite sure you have that solid a grasp on reality and feed off emotional responses and knee-jerk reactions to complicated situations.

THe probelm is, that while it is important to understand why they did it, that shouldn't affect at all the fact that they need to be punished. If they're insane they should be locked up in mental institutions, if they're not they should be locked up in prison.

Any abuse they may have suffered at home doesn't justify what they did. That's just one more attept to take away blame from the criminals. They commited that atrocity because they wanted to. No one forced them, no excuses.

And what's weird with my arguments regarding gun ownership? Gun ownership laws in most of Europe are based off of them. Don't know how things are in Turkmenistan where you live.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:

They did something terrible. It can certainly be labaled an "atrocity"They don't deserve a second chance, and no one who does what they did deserve a second chance. They weren't children, they were monsters. Their existence isn't encessary in society, quite the contrary. So locking them up in sokitary confinement isn't a problem.

I'm pretty sure you think pampering criminals and spitting in the face of their victims and in the face of law abiding citizens, will definately fix things. I mean just look at how well that worked out: one of them has physically assaulted several people sicne he's gotten out, and has been caught with child pornography on his PC. And who knows what the other one has done, but has managed to cover up (he was the smart, cold and calculated one of the two, so he probably does his best to not get caught).

Maybe you'll wake up one day, though I think you'll have to learn a lesson the hard way.

Yes, I'm the one who needs to wake up. Obviously, this was a failure on the part of the state... or maybe you missed my point that it's pretty obvious those kids needed better psychological evaluations before being released into public. I'm not even against stricter punishment than what they received (especially when coupled with their obvious lack of quality psychiatric care during imprisonment). What I AM against is locking them up and throwing away the key without ANY attempts to understand WHY they did what they did and what environment led them to such an act.

It's very possible that they were just sociopaths without any kind of empathy or regard to human life, in which case they should be in a secure mental institution for the rest of their lives, not prison. Either way, they shouldn't be released back into public. On the other hand, they could have been abused badly as children and there could be hope of rehabilitation there and someday, they could become a productive member of society. I don't know the situation and you don't, either. The difference between us is that I think it's the state's job to find out and you think it's okay to either lock them away or just kill them outright without trying to find out WHY this happened. Progress is made through attempts to understand why things happen and how to prevent them in the future, not by playing the role of ostrich and hiding away all the bad things in life.

Then again, after reading your bizarre arguments on gun ownership, I'm not quite sure you have that solid a grasp on reality and feed off emotional responses and knee-jerk reactions to complicated situations.

THe probelm is, that while it is important to understand why they did it, that shouldn't affect at all the fact that they need to be punished. If they're insane they should be locked up in mental institutions, if they're not they should be locked up in prison.

Any abuse they may have suffered at home doesn't justify what they did. That's just one more attept to take away blame from the criminals. They commited that atrocity because they wanted to. No one forced them, no excuses.

And what's weird with my arguments regarding gun ownership? Gun ownership laws in most of Europe are based off of them. Don't know how things are in Turkmenistan where you live.

Yeah. I don't live in Turkmenistan.

You honestly don't feel ANY sympathy for children who grow up in an abusive environment and commit crimes as adolescents? You don't think moral compasses are instilled through parenting and without it, children can do horrible things without fully understanding the repercussions of doing so? I'm not taking away blame from them and I'm all for punishing them for what happened but on the other hand, I'm willing to acknowledge that most people aren't born criminals and the better society tries to understand and work with children who didn't get to grow up in whitebread suburbia with a stable home environment, the less we'll see repeat career criminals and, in the case of America, a situation where a full 1/5 of all young black males are in some stage of the criminal justice system at any given moment. If a child grows up in a violent home, chances are they'll be violent. Is that really all their fault, especially if they commit the crime before they're even a teenager? I'm not absolving them of guilt, merely acknowledging that not everyone grows up in the same environment with the same opportunities. That may not be the situation with these two boys but the option needs to be explored instead of dooming the two of them to a non-existence in the prison system. It's not only wrong but it creates an undue burden on our social system that could be alleviated by tackling the problem instead of the symptoms.

Again, we've been trying your way for thousands of years. It doesn't really work. Don't you think it's time to try something different?




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

I beleive it's not our place to seek revenge... Just Gods...



Disrarge said:

I beleive it's not our place to seek revenge... Just Gods...


I agree