iasta said:
Nice to call me child... i am quite sure i am much more older than you. Anyway, this big mistake on the pricing just was a big blow for your argumentation. Cite an september 2010 article as there was a Nintendo conference in which they say the price jst few weeks ago show how you know well about the 3DS. After, yes 1st party studio can play a role, but actually i think for that Nintendo are in stronger position than sony. Also the bigger success on the psp are 3rd party software (GTA, Monster Hunter) not so much 1st party. The PS3 spin off on NGP will help the sales to the loyalist sony fans... but even without that they will have bought the system anyway, the question is how this game will help sony to extant its core? |
Stop using childish terms, and you won't be treated as a child. Pretty simple. So I made a flub on the 3DS, off by 51 dollars, oooooh. That's just HUGE. A simple correction is sufficient, I'd say, Epic Fail seems...well, childish and infantile, to say nothing of inappropriate for actual public discourse.
Again, you're straying from the topic at hand. It isn't about who is in the stronger position, it's about whether the 3DS will hold the NGP back. As I've said...numerous freekin times now. No, it won't. Sony's approach to the PSP, is not necessarily the approach they're going to have to the NGP, and assuming a company is incapable of evolving it's business strategy is a bit naive. Their first parties have taken a much much greater roll this generation, as 3rd parties moved away to other platforms. Sony forces those people who do come crawling back, to jump through numerous hurdles before allowing them to port anything. The same is not said for their 1st party studios, who've put out what, 3 GOTY games? And no shortage of stellar titles?
And given the entire architecture/design process of the NGP (as with the 3DS), included the developers as well as the engineers, all of Sony's internal devs will be more than familiar with the system right out of the gate, unlike the PS3 which they admittedly screwed up in that aspect. Couple that with the NGP's ability to run all shaders the PS3 uses, as well as being able to run the code the PS3 employs (with minor alteration, of course), it means it'll not only run complex in order code like the PS3 requires, but less complex out of order code that modern general purpose CPU's utilize.
I don't really care what you enjoy playing, I don't really care what you prefer, however, stay on topic. This isn't about which will perform better, we both know Nintendo shoots for a much wider demographic than Sony does. Sony continuously aims at the core that has kept them running since the PS1 debuted. Nintendo has their iconic line that is typically targeted at younger audiences (although, let's be clear, everyone still enjoys them, regardless of age...it's more that Nintendo adamantly refuses to make games for people older than 15). And, well, I just want a platform that has more adult oriented games. Sony doesn't need to 'expand their core', they simply need to regain much of what they lost in the transition from PS2 to PS3.