They are all "natural", but also avoidable. War is the result of human will, not of some uncontrolable natural circumstances.

In nature it's perfectly natural for those who are weaker and have less desirable traits to die, but he humans go against that and try to save everybody.

Lots of terrible things go on in nature, but that's because animals have no better way of solving their problems. It's simply their best solution.

However, we humans have superior intellect comapred to other animals, therefore you'd think we'd be able to solve our conflicts without killing eachother. War is nothing more than those fights kids have in kindergarden or school, except the kids are much bigger, much stronger, they use guns and seriously hurt eachother, sometimes killing eachother. The main difference is that they don't even know why they're there and what the other kids ever did to them, and vice versa.

Government should not censor speech, press, media, or internet

Did anyone disagree with this?

MOST PEOPLE LIKELY DISAGREE.  CENSORSHIP IS VERY POPULAR.  LOOK AT HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE UPSET OVER WIKILEAKS.

Military service should be voluntary. There should be no draft

Same as above.

MILITARY SERVICE ISN"T VOLUNTARY IN MUCH OF THE WORLD.  HECK, YOU EVEN GO TO JAIL IF YOU DON'T VOTE IN MUCH OF THE WORLD.

End "corporate welfare." No government handouts to business

What? "Corporate Welfare"? That's what they're calling a bailout which is going to save thousands of jobs and billions of investment dollars? I disagreed, despite the question trying to make disagreers sound like morons.

THE QUESTION DOESN'T TRY TO MAKE DISAGREES SOUND LIKE MORONS.

Let people control their own retirement; privatize Social Security

Not the phrasing this time, just the statement. If I don't want to abolish pensions, I'm a horrible evil socialist?

THIS ISN'T ABOUT ABOLISHING PENSIONS, THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING ELSE.

Replace government welfare with private charity

Completely abolish welfare? Completely abolish welfare? No disabled benefits? No unemployment benefits? Leave the poorest and most vulnerable people in society to starve? Even I'm not that right-wing.

THAT ISN'T a RIGHT WING POSITION, PER SAY.  UNEMPLOYMENT IS A FORCED GOVERNMENT INSURANCE PROGRAM.  PEOPLE SHOULDN'T GO TO JAIL IF THEY DON'T HAVE INSURANCE.  EITHER WAY, IT WOULD BE EASY ENOUGH TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO PRIVATELY BUY THAT INSURANCE IF THEY WANTED IT.

It should be a duty for men and voluntary for women IMO.

And its not about serving your government but serving your country.

Why should it be a duty for men? What has a "country" done for men (not that a country can do anything), which it hasn't done for women?

If it were up to me, I'd pull out of Afghanistan tomorrow.

Women can be good soldiers just as men can. There have been somesocieties in the world (I think mostly in Africa) where women were the ones who went to war (or served alongside men) and were just as good, if not better than men at physical combat. It's a geneder sterotype of the west that women are weak and can't fight, a sort of self fulfilling prophecy, because girls are conditioned to dislike physical activities since early childhood over here.

And Serbia is just some land on which some people live on. It's not the sort of living breathing entity you envision. All that matters is the people who live over there, not "the country", which is something no one should ever forget.

Also, you live in Germany now. I'm starting to see why people in the West are so annoyed by immigrants.

It is interesting to know how many people support slavery in this day and age.  So people should either be a slave to the government, go to jail or if they resist jail for this issue they should be killed? 

I'm sorry, I was a Sgt in the US Army.  I joined because I wanted the medical training, the experience and the bonuses to donate to pro-liberty causes like my local Libertarian Party, http://www.freetalklive.com/ and http://freestateproject.org/ .  I joined and donated $1000s to pro-liberty causes.  However, I'm glad I didn't serve along side slaves.  Frankly, I don't want anything to do with slaves or slavery.  This isn't the 1800s.

Slave? LMAO

I never said women should be in the army at all.I said it shouldn't be a duty for them. And I'd like to see your country invaded and than you posting a bolded sentence like that.

There's lots of things wrong with what you wrote.

First of all the police is reactive, not proactive. It's role is to make sure that all goes well within society.

The army's role isn't strictly reactive, and often times the army creates the conflicts (for example attacking another country). Wars don't represent the will of the people (I'm talking about both sides of a conflict), they're power games of political leaders. It's not really in any individual's interest to invade country X, or attack country Y etc. The citizens of country Y did not do anything to the citizens of country X and vice versa. These conflicts are started to political leaders, but are fought by normal people, who have nothing to benefit from them (though political leaders often use manipulation under the guise of patriotism and nationalism to fool people into thinking that their power games really concern them).

My country never will be invaded. And if it were to be invaded, half the population would leave and the other half would embrace the new rulers, most likely. The government would be the first to join the latter group.

As for women, what do you suppose their duty should be? Cooking for the army? Come on. Everyone in a country has the same duties; that's the very basis of equality. I think that if women expect equal rights to men, they should take equal actions, so if (atheist God forbid) there were a draft, it should be for both genders.