Linkzmax said:
I find it quite scummy the way you've quoted me out of context to try and paint it as if I have some knowledge that either would be a mislynch. Here was my post:
First, the sentence in quotations is the way I read your post. Then I ask why you say it is interesting, a question which you have still yet to answer. Then I list the reasons I could think of if I tried to put myself in you're shoes.(Something I've already shown I do, crazy as it may be) Now let me break down each thought I listed: If it's not already obvious what my answers are to your two questions, I'll answer them directly. I never stated that I know an ST or nen lynch would be a mislynch, nor do I know that it would or wouldn't be. I never stated that you agree that ST and/or nen should be lynched either. The difference between our responses is I tried to guess at your line of thought.You tried to twist my words to incriminate me. |
That's the point. You are looking way too far into one little word. "interesting" That's simply it. I just saw there were some similarities between them, and pointed it out. I never implied it was because they were scum or other reasons.
over-analyzation >.<
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."