Final-Fan said:
Linkzmax said:
Might I once again point out your logic fail, FF? As you've stated from "Inno FF's perspective," Linkz or nen is mafia. Though unlikely, a night kill could make tomorrow's decision easier, but at worst there's no chance that it lessens the odds for town to win. You should be voting for a no lynch even if you doubt it's likely to happen, but you've voted for me.
|
It's because I don't think there's any chance people will go for it. I think I already said that if anyone else will support a No Lynch I will go back on it like white on rice. But as it is, since there's a time limit, my best chance of getting a No Lynch is actually to vote for you, hoping for a tie vote to result! SO HA!
But I have a more important conundrum. Since your plan is actually workable, are you really townie (therefore nen is lying scum or noname is going to die), or did you just estimate a less than 50% probability of getting nen (mis)lynched, or is this some kind of Plan B for mafia-Linkz? But unless I come up with a different answer my vote stays on you.
|
Please rank these in the order of your preference: No lynch, Linkz lynch, FF lynch
Obviously the FF lynch would be last, but I'm also curious if you think voting for me is more likely to cause you to no be lynched than voting No lynch.
You're going to have to explain that bit about estimating a less than 50% probability of getting nen (mis)lynched. I understand the meaning, but not the scenario you're talking about. Today or tomorrow, and who else is left if tomorrow? Also "Plan B" doesn't mean anything to me unless you can theorize a "Plan A" that I would assume failed hence the need for a new plan.
Final-Fan said:
Linkzmax said:
Final-Fan said:
Way to read the very next post, Linkz. Or are you just typing out the proof I clearly realized already for the lulz?
|
Sorry, I thought that was sarcasm because you never cleared up how you were mistaken.
|
I did talk about the REASON for the key point of failure (the fact that I was assuming the "perspective" person didn't get lynched).
I'm really genuinely curious how you thought that statement fit into the sarcasm.
|
I thought
"OH SHIT I SEE THE LIGHT
OH WOW LINKZ I WITNESS THE MAJESTY OF YOUR PLAN"
was sarcasm.
Then with "You see, the problem is that in these games I think I can't get lynched. And to be fair, it's only happened to me once on VGC. " I'm not sure if I just missed the "I think" and took it as cockiness that you're saying the plan still fails because you wouldn't be lynched. Or perhaps because the whole time I've been thinking that my lynch is possible, though I'll fight against it tooth and nail, that I didn't see the relationship between your statement and why you thought my plan was ill-thought. Either way I get it now.