/ soo what a night!!.... 1 mafia lynched and 2 townies dead... does that mean there's an SK?!.... obviously, the flavor hints that Noname is the SK!!

/returns to christmass present shaped coffin

Yeah.. paranoid like a fox :P

@Bolded

I meant choosing to kill the last poster.

You make it sound like I'm 100% mafia going by this line, so why were you so focused on hat (besides that you think hat is 100% scum) then me going by your thought? Just for curisoty sakes, you two are like cats and dogs in this game. :/

@Linkz, I didn't want to say it on day two because it'd make me look really bad (as in, cowarding out in the game where the tension is up for me), which is why I didn't say so in day 2. Day 3 seems like the perfect to confess about this.

Oh and about the modkills, well its their choice to lurk (besides the personal issues everyone is mostly going through), and the way this game gets going, I can't argue through it.

Technically yes, but I fear that 8 might still be a little too high of a barrier at the moment, so I'm lowering it to 7.

I would prefer to let this day go on if we are going to be getting a purge.  It would probably help us focus as a town. 

I am glad Wonk finally abandoned his extreme tunnel vision of basically one hatmoza post, but I still wonder whether he really saw the light or just realized how bad it was making him look. 

I haven't reread the thread like a lot of you guys apparently just did, nor will I have time to today, but hopefully before too long.  It may give me better ideas on suspects. 

Linkz, if you are indeed mafia, well played sir. Despite your many and long posts, I'm not having much luck with pinning much against you; contrary to my belief of the more someone posts the more you can attack them. 

Hmph, Vette turned up town. I can't say I'm surprised but it would have gave me more ammo against F-F who I'm still uneasy of if Vette flipped scum ... and it would have been nice to get a semi-confirmation of being pro-town from it.

Will go back and reread nen, SAK's and j0's posts now.

Yes, true.

Who did prof suspect btw? Wasn't MG one of them? If yes, it could be that he actually happened to finger more than one mafia player, giving us a better range of lynch candidates.

If either Vette or ST where on his list, that would even further pin-point a target making this day a lot easier than we anticipated.

Just pick up from wherever you can. I really want you to participate in this game. I will personally forgive you and not hold it against you. Others probably won't be so forgiving.

That said, looking at Radish's posts above (and other posts before that) I'm starting to remember how terrible he was playing last game I was hosting. I actually wanted to suggest to have him banned from future games because I felt that he gets enjoyment out of placing a dark cloud of suspicion  over his own head. I later forgave him near the end of the game because he proved he can play when he wanted to. It kind  of pisses me off that he's intentionally going back to crap style of play.

Nope, prof didn't suspect MG, at least in not int he same list as Trucks, Sak, stefl and I:  http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3827353

I don't find that likely. Both MG and radish voted for scottie before SAK made his blunder and before nord jumped on it. Then ST(townie) climbed on board. After that myself, prof, and FF voted for SAK. Stefl then tied it up at 4 a piece, before nen and zex pushed SAK to 6. That's when prof switched trains to tie it up. Scottie then pushed SAK into the lead, but hat tied it up at 6 a piece. Finally, FF switched trains to scottie and after that nobody left alive voted for anyone besides scottie.

So of that'd mean MG and radish(if scum) had to preemptively save SAK by going after scottie. I don't buy it.
It could be that Stefl or Hat were trying to save scottie with their tying votes, but by that time I'd say scottie was digging his own grave.
I'm a bit suspicious of FF, but both he and I were on SAK early. If either of us were mafia, I don't think the vote on fellow mafia(if SAK is such) was forced to "look good." Meaning it was a big blunder by SAK, but not such that everyone that didn't immediately jump on it would be suspicious. So I don't think FF's vote was an effort to save a scumbuddy and I know my vote wasn't such.
That leaves j0 and yourself towards the tail end of the voting. By then I believe scottie's fate was sealed and it was really just a matter of who was going to make the final votes. I don't consider it a pass, but it's far less incriminating.

My thoughts on nord? Well it branches into 3 possibilities(well 4):
1) Both nord and SAK are scum - nord was trying to bus SAK to gain some credibility
2) Only nord is scum - nord was trying to set SAK up/later claim SAK's blunder was trivial and say anyone that jumped on it was suspicious
3) nord is town - nord thinks SAK is scum/later claim SAK's blunder was trivial and say anyone that jumped on it was suspicious

I lean towards 3(a) myself as that's where I fit. However, the others could make sense too. It's something that's only more telling if either winds up dead.