By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Triple SLI can't even run Crysis properly.

the first Crysis demo was on 8800GTXs that were overclocked to retarded levels thanks to phase change. Now you tell me what they were running on since they had a Core 2 E6700 OCed to 5.7GHz.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network
totalwar23 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
totalwar23 said:

What the hell is up with the developers?


What do you mean?

I mean how could they even think of developing something where even the most powerful PCs can't even run it at max at 60 FPS especially when midrange PCs are still capable of pushing superior graphics now.

 


They made the game that they as a company wanted to.  If it hurts them financially because their consumer base is small, so what?  It's their choice.  Why should it bother you that most PCs can't run it yet?



Up-to-date gaming PCs can run Crysis on acceptable levels, and future PCs will be able to run it on the max settings on acceptable levels...that's how they designed the game, and it's not that big of a deal.

The affordable hardware to run Crysis on its maxed settings does not exist. That's not really the developers fault, as the game is still good on regular settings. They made it a viable benchmark in gaming technology for now and the coming year, that's all.



LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release.  (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )

Untamoi said:
Nighteyes_1981 said:
I didn't see the rest of the specs of the machine they were running there. Likely there's a bottleneck somewhere else.

 

Actually, I have read from couple of reviews that there is no such PC available currently which can run Crysis in very high settings with good framerates. So maybe even eliminating bottlenecks wouldn't help.


I remember reading the same thingabout Messiah.



I imagine they're also running Crysis vanilla. There's a lot of tweaks that make it a hell of a lot smoother. There's always a lot more going on with PC performance besides just the game.

Here's 1 tweak (probably the single biggest one)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaHS-y_mapQ

I've had to do a ton of fiddling with Crysis, but it runs very well at reasonably high settings on my computer.



Around the Network
cAPSLOCK said:
I imagine they're also running Crysis vanilla. There's a lot of tweaks that make it a hell of a lot smoother. There's always a lot more going on with PC performance besides just the game.

Here's 1 tweak (probably the single biggest one)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaHS-y_mapQ

I've had to do a ton of fiddling with Crysis, but it runs very well at reasonably high settings on my computer.

 wait till the 9800GTX and 9800Pro. All that possible on very high. I hope Nvidia is smart and puts ddr4 in the video card.. will boost perfermance of any card 40%.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

Well the devs did say that they wanted to make sure that it would be a game that you'd be able to reinstall on a new machine 3-4 years from now and see improvements.



I have a feeling they used Nvidia's GOD Graphics Card for their main dev card. And at 17k a pop that definitely would be a reason why the game will have some odd legs like Battlefield 2 did.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

3 8800s in SLi =/= the combined power of 3 8800s. SLi is pretty inefficient, and is only useful if there are no better cards on the market yet. A nVidia 9800 or whatever is up next will probably be more powerful than two 8800s in SLi.

Also, the ram is probably another limitation.  They should probably up it to 4 gigs using Vista 64-bit.



BenKenobi88 said:
Up-to-date gaming PCs can run Crysis on acceptable levels, and future PCs will be able to run it on the max settings on acceptable levels...that's how they designed the game, and it's not that big of a deal.

The affordable hardware to run Crysis on its maxed settings does not exist. That's not really the developers fault, as the game is still good on regular settings. They made it a viable benchmark in gaming technology for now and the coming year, that's all.

Perfectly stated~

There are PCs that can play Crysis on very high with framerates in the 50-60 range. Can you get those computers for under $1.8k? Nope, especially if you want to waste time mucking around with Vista (and yes you can enable Very High in XP despite not having DX10).

You can also play it at high settings with a PC in the $700-800 range. In a few years mid-range cards will be playing it just fine and everybody will be happy.

 

 



To Each Man, Responsibility