PS3 users are more ubiquitous and vocal than 36 0 users. It is a general trend I see from VGChartz, to Gamespot, to IGN, and on.

I don't recall the Alan Wake hype because I was too busy buying Red Dead Redemption.

Neither side is innocent, yet it appears to me that PS3 users are off their proverbial hinges this generation, while Nintendo users are the most polite and respectful. 360 users fall somewhere in between with a tad more devious nature because we know exactly what buttons to push to get emotional screeds.

Whereas toying around in the Nintendo forums will garner a beat-down, logical "lets look at the top 20 best selling games of this gen" reaction; toying around in the Sony forums produces enough emotion to make Clint Eastwood cry.

1. you didn't see Alan wakes hype? then maybe you shouldn't bash ps3 users for uber hyping cause clearly you only see one side being  at fault.

2.It appears to you PS3 fans are worst? lets see....don't own a ps3 and a 360 only owner why am I not surprise you think 360 fans are better.

Hey lets ask a PS3 fanboy in this very site which fans he thinks are much worst ps3 or 360 Im sure hes answer is PS3 fans./s

Like I said maybe you should stop bashing PS3 fans cause clearly you didn't see the ammount of trashing PS3 fans got back in its early years from the "GOOD HEARTED" 360 fans, you only see 1 side of the story here.

You obviously haven't been roaming around the Internet enough if you've come to that conclusion. 360 fanboys basically took over every game related site from 2006 to 2008 and they continue to be a nuisance even today. You've just overlooked those fanboys because you have a bias towards a certain console and you agree with many of the things those fanboys may say, the difference is that your both polite and smart enough to keep most of your negativity to yourself. I can level that same accusation to any Nintendo or Sony appreciator. But when someone claims that one group of idiots is worse than another, then it makes you look a little silly. 

It's so weird  how people forget the Oblivion, Bioshock and Mass Effect 2 reactions that came up when they went multi-platform, but they are quick to bring up the Final Fantasy reaction. It's weird how people bring up how Killzone 2, GT5, MGS4 and Little Big Planet are over hyped, but for some reason they forget the hype that came before Halo 3, Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Too Human and Kinect.

Nintendo fans are also far from civil, they just don't have the forum userbase to make as big of an impact. They trash nearly every website when a low review is given, they have some weird hate for analyst and they would defend anything Nintendo did, even if the company clearly made a mistake.

Don't be the guy who always points fingers at specific groups, without taking the actions of every other group into consideration. 360 fan boys have been just as bad in the past and just because you turn a blind eye towards them, it doesn't mean that you can point the finger at someone else.

LOL @ the comments. Seriously is it wrong for people to hate GT5. You can't expect everyone to like the game or share the same personal preference.  I have played GT5 and actually own a copy and i can tell you that the game to me ain't that impressive considering the time it took them to make it .  I was merely disappointed at the fact that it took them 5 years to  create 200 new plus and 800 ps2 upscaled cars, online ain't that great and the environment and the textures are quite plain. Damage on cars look like cardboard boxes being squashed and so on  To me thats pathetic as you would expect more from then especially when it took them 5 years to make it. Despite the flaws in the game , its still a good game but definitely not a god in the racing genre.  If i were to review the game and give it an honest  score then i would give it a 7 out 10.

yeah but we are not complaining about genuine opinions giving a 0 or 2 and not even listing the features gave them away when they mentioned forza

happens with many games not surprising.

how many hours did you play the game? the game isnt perfect, but just because it took them 5 years it shoudnt be. did you play b spec mode?  did you play the endurance race on le mans? to review a game the size of gt5 correctly people shoudnt use hype to base their review on, and should play it alteast for more then 30 hours, those are two things you didnt do.

lol. "Helpful? 8 of 48 users say yes"

Edit: just checked Badgenome's review, "5 of 37 users say yes", your review has better quality.

I owned grew up with a PS1 and PS2, so I don't see it as being "one-sided" considering my experience with Sony. Yes, I do own a 360 right now, but I don't see that as biasing me one way or another because between the PS1 and PS2, I have spent more years gaming on Sony systems than a Microsoft system.

10 years between PS1 and PS2 compared to 2 years on the 360. In light of my experience, I just cannot say I am biased against one system over another.

Same goes for Nintendo where between the NES, SNES, and N64, I spent over a decade playing Nintendo consoles.

As for not being critical of Microsoft, I have been but in a more reasoned fashion regarding Microsoft's lack of attention to developing 1st party titles to define the Xbox experience. I can't bash Microsoft like Sony and Nintendo because they don't have the history of success and failure. The 360 as a 2nd generation Microsoft console is a smash success, while both Nintendo and Sony have reached the top and fell drastically with the GameCube and PS3 (in comparison to the PS2).

Is it fair? No, like life very little is fair, but I will try my best to keep it civil.