92-96 seems like a safe bet. Also, my precise bet is in the middle, at 94.

No idea about percentage as I don't usually look into that kind of details.

Why does everyone give one number for #3, I would hate to arrange your thread.

With such oblivious people, just... Ahhhhh!  =(

Don't worry I found a solution, because they're only giving one number I'm taking 5% under and 5% over =D and then we have something that matches what I wanted. ^^

I'm sorry, but this is a complete non-issue. Almost every score will be near perfect because, like previous high end titles, any reviewer that 'dares' to give it less than perfect will be spammed, have their lives threatened and possibly have his or her house burned down by PS3 fanatics. Thus, this will be like predicting if the tide will still continue to come in or if the sun will end up shining tomorrow.

I figure it'll be a good game, but, frankly, the scores will be complete fabrications in order for critics to save themselves the trouble of getting harped at.

(EDIT: I guess I should add that the whole 'house burning' thing is meant as a exagerated statement, since there will obviously be people demanding proof that houses were burned down...)

Wait what? -_-

1. 93-97

2. 96

3. 27%-37%

1. 88-92

2. 90

3. 12-22%

Remember when Killzone 2 came out? People who dared to say that there were imperfections with the game actually received death threats from the fanbase. People who didn't give Metal Gear Solid 4 98% or higher rankings were subject to spam, ridicule and, unsurprisingly, more threats.

Basically, trying to judge what the verdicts will be are easy. Do these people really want to be flooded, yet again, with more death threats, email bombs (also part of the MGS4 reaction) and spam including insults about every possible thing ever? The ratings will be universally high, but there's no way to tell who actually likes the game and who wants to avoid another problem with the fans. That's what I mean. Why bother guessing when there's going to be no variation anyways?

Wow if I didn't know these games (or if I didn't know how to use the internet) I would think that these games had 95 and more metascore with over 80% perfect scores because of these threats. But I'll give you some metascores from important websites that are under 95 and even 90.

But before that Killzone 2's metascore : 9, with 15.6% perfect scores.

IGN UK : 92, Gametrailers : 92, Gamspot : 90, IGN AU : 90, Game Informer : 88, PSM3 Magazine UK : 88, Extreme Gamer : 87, Edge : 70. Yea for sure these website gave these score because they were threatened. And the perfect scores are mostly coming from websites that have a 5 point system, they often give 5/5 or A. But KZ2 came after MGS4 and all the so called death threats spam concerning PS3 exclusives.

MGS4 metascore : 94 (OMGZ), with 37.8% perfect scores (KZ2 has a lower percentage)

Edge & Eurogamer gave it a 80. And don't tell me that they don't deserve their metascore, they're awesome games.

No matter what it's pointless, we're just here to give a prediction because we know that there'll be low scores to compensate too high ones, I'm not answering anymore about this. Thanks for coming...

Let's continue with the predictions.

Ok guys, now that we have the release date and how many cars etc.. predict!!