steverhcp02 said: ummmm why is everyone trashing CK.....to me what he said had nothing to do with the PS3 being "ok" without MH3.....i thought what he said was the game wont suffer, it wont be a big deal except for graphical difference...am i missing something? |
Because suggesting that the Wii is no more capable than the PS2 is a blatant troll. In reality, the Wii is about three times as powerful as the PS3 (about 3x as much memory, about 3x as powerful in terms of raw calculations CPU wise, and a much faster GPU). It's not a small difference, but because the Wii had so much unexpected popularity there were a lot of quick-and-dirty PSP/PS2 ports to the Wii that gave the general public a perception that it was even more underpowered than it actually is.
Having played through a significant chunk of SMG, you'll note that there are few games on the market, even on systems many times as powerful as the Wii, that really look a lot better. Some of the shaders Nintendo made for that game are phenominal, it never has any slowdowns, and the game overall looks fantastic but has some "oh wow" moments.
It's the kind of trolling for which mods should be warning people. Having community members trolling like this with absolutely no substance or rationality behind the troll makes VGChartz look bad as if it's a site full of mindless fanboys, and that undermines the whole goal of the site.