By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - 3 YEARS After the PS3 Song (Remember it?) - Do you think PS3 has IMPROVED?

 

3 YEARS After the PS3 Song (Remember it?) - Do you think PS3 has IMPROVED?

Yes it has, I am proud of... 120 69.36%
 
LOL no GT5 still aint out!!!!!!! 29 16.76%
 
Wow Darth's dog sings well!! 24 13.87%
 
Total:173
indodude on 14 October 2010
darthdevidem01 said:
kopstudent89 said:
Crystalchild said:
kopstudent89 said:

I got a PS3 in 2007 for GT5!$700 if i recall well! And yes i absolutely agreed with the song, it was crap back then!! I really hated my PS3 :P Until that is 2009 when the PS3 really hit its stride! 2010 has been a great year as a PS3 owner. 

HOWEVER YESTERDAY I GOT THE NEWS THAT GT5 GOT DELAYED AGAIN!!!!! SO MY ANSWER IS B 


delayed for 3 days, dude. so dont worry, it sucks that it may not come out in early November, but definetly before Christmas, so its barely a Month of waiting. keep up, 1 Month is nothing compared to your 4 years you waited til now. ;D


TBH me and my friend have been waiting for 4 years! He kept saying that it'll get delayed again, and really it was that kind of joke! It's just ridiculous, and i hate sony for that :P

I've waited for it since I was 13 years old

all my teenage years have been spent waiting for GT5!

Edit: OMG guys...that sounds so sad! 

lol that is sad



Around the Network
FinalEvangelion on 14 October 2010

TBH, I think MS and Sony has switched places this generation.  The abandonment of first party studios from MS is leaving a bad taste in my mouth.  Even though I never cared much what PR people said in the companies (I usually ignored it and let fanboys chew on it), Aaron Greenburg is doing a good job in the bad PR movement.  I do hope MS goes back to what it was about at the beginning of the generation - gaming.  After avoiding the first Xbox with a 10 foot pole, MS had me for a while with Mistwalker being on board. I really want more than just Halo and Gears.

 

IMO, Sony has come out with the best games this gen even though it didn't seem like it at first.  Of all 3 consoles I own, I use my PS3 about 85% of the time.



"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.

 

SpartenOmega117 on 14 October 2010
akuseru said:
Isuck said:

The only thing has changed since then is the price.

Sony still has no Halo, killzone 2 was sort of a fail and 3 dosnt look like it will change that. They made fun if Wii and now look MOVE! Online has improved but XBL has as well, there still playing catch up in that department. And the thing that no one cany deny that Ps3 is still in 3rd place.

1. Halo? Who the fuck cares? I know I don't. I don't care if games sell 10m copies. They don't have to to be excellent games. PS3 got games catering to everybody. Sony has a bunch of 1m selling IPs they can show to this gen, old and new alike. LBP, inFamous, Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls (not 1m ), White Knight Chronicles (not 1m ), MAG, Killzone 2, God of War 3, GT5 (not yet 1m ), ModNation Racers (FAR from 1m ), Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, The Last Guardian (not yet 1m ) and one could go on and on. Sony even has competing IPs like MAG, Killzone and Resistance in the FPS genre. MS got only one FPS game to their name, of course it sells more copies based on this alone (not saying this is the sole reason, and might not be a reason at all, however, I do believe it is)... I don't care if I miss out on 4 or 5 IPs this gen. Oh no, I miss out on Gears, Halo, Fable and Forza. OMG, the pain... I don't care, I missed out on thousands of games before this gen, and I won't cry just because I can't get to play some macho shooters that doesn't interest me anyways... I do want to play Alan Wake though... on the PC...

I would rather have all the games Sony makes for us PS3 users (selling decent, ok or good numbers) than the Big Four by MS (selling 'great' numbers). I mean, every year, all I hear is: New Gears, New Halo, New Fable and New Forza from the 360 people. Gears isn't even an MS IP, so I wouldn't really count it....

2. IMO, when released, the Wii was a joke. It was a novelty. The motion controls were terrible. I got the Wii a week before launch, and one week after launch it did not entertain me anymore.... at all (before Mario Galaxy that is)... So Sony could mock the Wii all they wanted at the beginning, because it was simply not as advertised at all, and imo a really faulty control scheme. Flick your wrists is a novelty, at least in my opinion. WiiMotion made it betters, and that new WiiMote will be even better againg I guess. I haven't played Move, so I can''t comment on it compared to the Wii.

3. PSN is free, XBL is not. That one thing right there makes MS the ones catching up in my opinion. You're paying for what? Dedicated servers? No (Bla, bla, bla, Gears 3 will have it...). ABOUT FUCKING TIME I say. There are many PS3 games with dedicated servers, I guess MS is lagging behind in this area too (imo). X-game chat? Well, if that's worth the subscription be my guest. "Voice messages" (or whatever they are called)? Oh ye.... I really want to know what is so much better on XBL than on PSN. Because I can't really see any reason for XBL being touted as a superior service. In my opinion, PSN is far superior to XBL, but I guess I'm just a stupid nobody, and possibly a troll/fanboy (pick the most suiting option, lol...) in your eyes.


you make a lot of good points



Doobie_wop on 15 October 2010

Just so everyone knows, the song was made by a site called Sarcastic Gamer, they specialise in making parody songs about things that are happening in the industry. They've made some about the 360, Wii, Fat Princess, MW2, E3 and so on. It's not meant to be taken seriously and it's more of a 'attack everyone' kinda thing they have going on. It's an entertaining site and some of their songs are really good.

I also paid $1000 for my PS3 back n 2006, it was the first Sony console that I ever bought at launch and it continues to be my favourite console alongside the N64 and the Gamecube.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

hikaruchan on 15 October 2010
darthdevidem01 said:

Remember this song? It was made in 2007

It has over 6 MILLION VIEWS on youtube

This song was actually very popular in our school, me being a PS3 fan had to endure it being shown to me all the time!!!!

But now 3 years later after all has passed it feels like SONY turned it around with the PS3!!

We have seen an improvement in online, sales and games quality........and I can have no shame in saying PS3 has the best exclusives now!

Did any of you see this song back in PS3's 2007? 

Yes I did it was LOL

and did anyboy see this one.



Japanese Pop Culture Otaku

Around the Network
hikaruchan on 15 October 2010
darthdevidem01 said:
kopstudent89 said:
Crystalchild said:
kopstudent89 said:

I got a PS3 in 2007 for GT5!$700 if i recall well! And yes i absolutely agreed with the song, it was crap back then!! I really hated my PS3 :P Until that is 2009 when the PS3 really hit its stride! 2010 has been a great year as a PS3 owner. 

HOWEVER YESTERDAY I GOT THE NEWS THAT GT5 GOT DELAYED AGAIN!!!!! SO MY ANSWER IS B 


delayed for 3 days, dude. so dont worry, it sucks that it may not come out in early November, but definetly before Christmas, so its barely a Month of waiting. keep up, 1 Month is nothing compared to your 4 years you waited til now. ;D


TBH me and my friend have been waiting for 4 years! He kept saying that it'll get delayed again, and really it was that kind of joke! It's just ridiculous, and i hate sony for that :P

I've waited for it since I was 13 years old

all my teenage years have been spent waiting for GT5!

Edit: OMG guys...that sounds so sad! 

well Duke Nukem Forever was anounced in 1997, I was 15 back then LOL.  



Japanese Pop Culture Otaku

kopstudent89 on 15 October 2010
hikaruchan said:
darthdevidem01 said:
kopstudent89 said:
Crystalchild said:
kopstudent89 said:

I got a PS3 in 2007 for GT5!$700 if i recall well! And yes i absolutely agreed with the song, it was crap back then!! I really hated my PS3 :P Until that is 2009 when the PS3 really hit its stride! 2010 has been a great year as a PS3 owner. 

HOWEVER YESTERDAY I GOT THE NEWS THAT GT5 GOT DELAYED AGAIN!!!!! SO MY ANSWER IS B 


delayed for 3 days, dude. so dont worry, it sucks that it may not come out in early November, but definetly before Christmas, so its barely a Month of waiting. keep up, 1 Month is nothing compared to your 4 years you waited til now. ;D


TBH me and my friend have been waiting for 4 years! He kept saying that it'll get delayed again, and really it was that kind of joke! It's just ridiculous, and i hate sony for that :P

I've waited for it since I was 13 years old

all my teenage years have been spent waiting for GT5!

Edit: OMG guys...that sounds so sad! 

well Duke Nukem Forever was anounced in 1997, I was 15 back then LOL.  


LMAO!!!! Sad gamers we are XD



Aldro on 15 October 2010
hikaruchan said:
darthdevidem01 said:

Remember this song? It was made in 2007

It has over 6 MILLION VIEWS on youtube

This song was actually very popular in our school, me being a PS3 fan had to endure it being shown to me all the time!!!!

But now 3 years later after all has passed it feels like SONY turned it around with the PS3!!

We have seen an improvement in online, sales and games quality........and I can have no shame in saying PS3 has the best exclusives now!

Did any of you see this song back in PS3's 2007? 

Yes I did it was LOL

and did anyboy see this one.

Haha, MGS4 still not happening on the 360 xD. There was another song aswell for the 360 xP.



FF_Fanatic on 15 October 2010
akuseru said:
Isuck said:

The only thing has changed since then is the price.

Sony still has no Halo, killzone 2 was sort of a fail and 3 dosnt look like it will change that. They made fun if Wii and now look MOVE! Online has improved but XBL has as well, there still playing catch up in that department. And the thing that no one cany deny that Ps3 is still in 3rd place.

1. Halo? Who the fuck cares? I know I don't. I don't care if games sell 10m copies. They don't have to to be excellent games. PS3 got games catering to everybody. Sony has a bunch of 1m selling IPs they can show to this gen, old and new alike. LBP, inFamous, Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls (not 1m ), White Knight Chronicles (not 1m ), MAG, Killzone 2, God of War 3, GT5 (not yet 1m ), ModNation Racers (FAR from 1m ), Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, The Last Guardian (not yet 1m ) and one could go on and on. Sony even has competing IPs like MAG, Killzone and Resistance in the FPS genre. MS got only one FPS game to their name, of course it sells more copies based on this alone (not saying this is the sole reason, and might not be a reason at all, however, I do believe it is)... I don't care if I miss out on 4 or 5 IPs this gen. Oh no, I miss out on Gears, Halo, Fable and Forza. OMG, the pain... I don't care, I missed out on thousands of games before this gen, and I won't cry just because I can't get to play some macho shooters that doesn't interest me anyways... I do want to play Alan Wake though... on the PC...

I would rather have all the games Sony makes for us PS3 users (selling decent, ok or good numbers) than the Big Four by MS (selling 'great' numbers). I mean, every year, all I hear is: New Gears, New Halo, New Fable and New Forza from the 360 people. Gears isn't even an MS IP, so I wouldn't really count it....

2. IMO, when released, the Wii was a joke. It was a novelty. The motion controls were terrible. I got the Wii a week before launch, and one week after launch it did not entertain me anymore.... at all (before Mario Galaxy that is)... So Sony could mock the Wii all they wanted at the beginning, because it was simply not as advertised at all, and imo a really faulty control scheme. Flick your wrists is a novelty, at least in my opinion. WiiMotion made it betters, and that new WiiMote will be even better againg I guess. I haven't played Move, so I can''t comment on it compared to the Wii.

3. PSN is free, XBL is not. That one thing right there makes MS the ones catching up in my opinion. You're paying for what? Dedicated servers? No (Bla, bla, bla, Gears 3 will have it...). ABOUT FUCKING TIME I say. There are many PS3 games with dedicated servers, I guess MS is lagging behind in this area too (imo). X-game chat? Well, if that's worth the subscription be my guest. "Voice messages" (or whatever they are called)? Oh ye.... I really want to know what is so much better on XBL than on PSN. Because I can't really see any reason for XBL being touted as a superior service. In my opinion, PSN is far superior to XBL, but I guess I'm just a stupid nobody, and possibly a troll/fanboy (pick the most suiting option, lol...) in your eyes.

the new wiimote just has wiimotion plus inside of it, so you don;t need the wiimotion add on anymore, in other words no more improveent, sorry

also why have you not played on move yet, find a friend that has one and get with it already, move is miles better than wiimotion



akuseru on 15 October 2010
FF_Fanatic said:
akuseru said:
Isuck said:

The only thing has changed since then is the price.

Sony still has no Halo, killzone 2 was sort of a fail and 3 dosnt look like it will change that. They made fun if Wii and now look MOVE! Online has improved but XBL has as well, there still playing catch up in that department. And the thing that no one cany deny that Ps3 is still in 3rd place.

1. Halo? Who the fuck cares? I know I don't. I don't care if games sell 10m copies. They don't have to to be excellent games. PS3 got games catering to everybody. Sony has a bunch of 1m selling IPs they can show to this gen, old and new alike. LBP, inFamous, Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls (not 1m ), White Knight Chronicles (not 1m ), MAG, Killzone 2, God of War 3, GT5 (not yet 1m ), ModNation Racers (FAR from 1m ), Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, The Last Guardian (not yet 1m ) and one could go on and on. Sony even has competing IPs like MAG, Killzone and Resistance in the FPS genre. MS got only one FPS game to their name, of course it sells more copies based on this alone (not saying this is the sole reason, and might not be a reason at all, however, I do believe it is)... I don't care if I miss out on 4 or 5 IPs this gen. Oh no, I miss out on Gears, Halo, Fable and Forza. OMG, the pain... I don't care, I missed out on thousands of games before this gen, and I won't cry just because I can't get to play some macho shooters that doesn't interest me anyways... I do want to play Alan Wake though... on the PC...

I would rather have all the games Sony makes for us PS3 users (selling decent, ok or good numbers) than the Big Four by MS (selling 'great' numbers). I mean, every year, all I hear is: New Gears, New Halo, New Fable and New Forza from the 360 people. Gears isn't even an MS IP, so I wouldn't really count it....

2. IMO, when released, the Wii was a joke. It was a novelty. The motion controls were terrible. I got the Wii a week before launch, and one week after launch it did not entertain me anymore.... at all (before Mario Galaxy that is)... So Sony could mock the Wii all they wanted at the beginning, because it was simply not as advertised at all, and imo a really faulty control scheme. Flick your wrists is a novelty, at least in my opinion. WiiMotion made it betters, and that new WiiMote will be even better againg I guess. I haven't played Move, so I can''t comment on it compared to the Wii.

3. PSN is free, XBL is not. That one thing right there makes MS the ones catching up in my opinion. You're paying for what? Dedicated servers? No (Bla, bla, bla, Gears 3 will have it...). ABOUT FUCKING TIME I say. There are many PS3 games with dedicated servers, I guess MS is lagging behind in this area too (imo). X-game chat? Well, if that's worth the subscription be my guest. "Voice messages" (or whatever they are called)? Oh ye.... I really want to know what is so much better on XBL than on PSN. Because I can't really see any reason for XBL being touted as a superior service. In my opinion, PSN is far superior to XBL, but I guess I'm just a stupid nobody, and possibly a troll/fanboy (pick the most suiting option, lol...) in your eyes.

the new wiimote just has wiimotion plus inside of it, so you don;t need the wiimotion add on anymore, in other words no more improveent, sorry

also why have you not played on move yet, find a friend that has one and get with it already, move is miles better than wiimotion

1. I am the only one of my friends that would even consider Move (not because my friends think Move sucks, but because I am Mr. Playstation and kind of Mr. Gamer in my crew. They all got PS3s, but I am the one buying the games and stuff), so i don't have any friends I could go to sadly.

2. The reason I have not bought it yet myself is because I moved to Japan this September and as we all know, Move is not here yet =) So this even makes #1 a problem, no friends around.

Looking forward to Move though as I have always enjoyed Motion Control gaming, only not been satisfied with many of the titles released with a Motion Control scheme.