akuseru said:
Isuck said:
The only thing has changed since then is the price.
Sony still has no Halo, killzone 2 was sort of a fail and 3 dosnt look like it will change that. They made fun if Wii and now look MOVE! Online has improved but XBL has as well, there still playing catch up in that department. And the thing that no one cany deny that Ps3 is still in 3rd place.
|
1. Halo? Who the fuck cares? I know I don't. I don't care if games sell 10m copies. They don't have to to be excellent games. PS3 got games catering to everybody. Sony has a bunch of 1m selling IPs they can show to this gen, old and new alike. LBP, inFamous, Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls (not 1m ), White Knight Chronicles (not 1m ), MAG, Killzone 2, God of War 3, GT5 (not yet 1m ), ModNation Racers (FAR from 1m ), Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, The Last Guardian (not yet 1m ) and one could go on and on. Sony even has competing IPs like MAG, Killzone and Resistance in the FPS genre. MS got only one FPS game to their name, of course it sells more copies based on this alone (not saying this is the sole reason, and might not be a reason at all, however, I do believe it is)... I don't care if I miss out on 4 or 5 IPs this gen. Oh no, I miss out on Gears, Halo, Fable and Forza. OMG, the pain... I don't care, I missed out on thousands of games before this gen, and I won't cry just because I can't get to play some macho shooters that doesn't interest me anyways... I do want to play Alan Wake though... on the PC...
I would rather have all the games Sony makes for us PS3 users (selling decent, ok or good numbers) than the Big Four by MS (selling 'great' numbers). I mean, every year, all I hear is: New Gears, New Halo, New Fable and New Forza from the 360 people. Gears isn't even an MS IP, so I wouldn't really count it....
2. IMO, when released, the Wii was a joke. It was a novelty. The motion controls were terrible. I got the Wii a week before launch, and one week after launch it did not entertain me anymore.... at all (before Mario Galaxy that is)... So Sony could mock the Wii all they wanted at the beginning, because it was simply not as advertised at all, and imo a really faulty control scheme. Flick your wrists is a novelty, at least in my opinion. WiiMotion made it betters, and that new WiiMote will be even better againg I guess. I haven't played Move, so I can''t comment on it compared to the Wii.
3. PSN is free, XBL is not. That one thing right there makes MS the ones catching up in my opinion. You're paying for what? Dedicated servers? No (Bla, bla, bla, Gears 3 will have it...). ABOUT FUCKING TIME I say. There are many PS3 games with dedicated servers, I guess MS is lagging behind in this area too (imo). X-game chat? Well, if that's worth the subscription be my guest. "Voice messages" (or whatever they are called)? Oh ye.... I really want to know what is so much better on XBL than on PSN. Because I can't really see any reason for XBL being touted as a superior service. In my opinion, PSN is far superior to XBL, but I guess I'm just a stupid nobody, and possibly a troll/fanboy (pick the most suiting option, lol...) in your eyes.
|
