why not just have sex

Crazed Environmentalists

Pushy religious people

Bobby Kotick

Everyone on Jersey Shore

Justin Beiber

Hipsters

Emo kids

Gangster kids

Kanye West

No one, hating never leads to anything good.

As a scientist myself, who works in a field prone to animal testing out-branching (Genetic Engineering), I always found within my own ethics code to be against animal testing. 

While I agree that some times (and through the history of the last 70-80 years), animal testing have produced some important results and findings, if you look at the majority of those tests, you'll find that they were unnecessary, cruel and outright disgusting.
Animal tests in the cosmetic area are amongst the worst ones, as hundreds of thousands of animals die just by simple allergic reactions that can' t appear on humans, simply due to a different genetic constitution.

Plus, in every field that requires animal tests, you also need to have a very strict control group regarding the phase were you begin to compare the data between animal testing and human testing, simply because of the same reason, different genetic input and reaction to any particular testing compound, thus sometimes making animal tests rather unnecessary, as the results yielded are impracticable on humans.

On topic - I rarely hate on anything, hate is such a strong word that shouldn't have a place on this world, but I do dislike a lot of things, amongst them passive-aggressive people who always try to bring others down while trying to look innocent. I know way too many of them, both in real life and here on the internet.

Anarchists stand for real freedom. They do not conform with the laws of  society and they do not listen to authorities/government. They fight for freedom and they would rather die a freedom warrior than a victim/coward. 

You may take our lives but you will never take our.......... FREEDOM!!!!

I have no problems with anarchists. 

Nooooooooooooooooo..........!!!!!!

We must be watching different games because there is literally no fighting in the playoffs. Teams don't even let their goons on the ice in the playoffs. You don't risk sending your crappiest player out when your season is on the line, and you don't risk sending him out to start a fight when the other player could turn him down and now ur looking at killing off a penalty in the playoffs. It's very rare to see fights in the playoffs. They happen, but not often and only in a natural circumstance.

I'm in favour of a cap. Probably because I'm a die-hard Blackhawks fan, and they had the cheapest owner in the league before the lockout. Team bias aside, though, I still like a cap system. I much prefer the way the NHL and NFL are run than the way MLB is run. You can look at the MLB when teh season starts and point out 15 teams that are guaranteed to miss the playoffs. It's kind of a shame that so many teams have no shot to win every year. At least the NHL now, and the NFL have parity. Teams that are bad take a few years to get good and good teams eventually need to be bad in order to rebuild. 

The problem with anarchists isn't what they stand for, it's how they often try to get it. Random acts of violence against innocent people isn't exacty the best way to get people to support your cause. And they don't even offer the promise of 72 virgins when you die!!!

those are the radicals.  Most often they are just hyper liberals wanting a simpler life, one that doesn't have things like IT or genetic engineering or christians, etc.  Things that they dont like

republicans.......   >_>