By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - EMEAA Up - 18 September 2010

BenVTrigger said:
steverhcp02 said:
BenVTrigger said:

Halo Reach is a JUGGERNAUT.  Major impact on hardware as I've been predicting for MONTHS even though people kept saying "Everyone who likes Halo already owns a 360.".

And PS3 above Wii 0_0

Nintendo is in trouble this holiday in regards to being a "dominant" system, especially with Kinect coming in November.


Actually i think people saying that have a more compelling argument as Reach only increased 50k over Halo 3.

If we had any idea of how many LE consoles sold or how many were produced for the region we could have a pretty good debate from both sides. But a few years after Halo 3 and a pretty even amount of Halo software i think its pretty safe to say the fanbase for Reach remained relatively flat all things considered.

Doesnt take anything away form the sales though. Its still ridiculous but anytime theres a LE bundle we have no idea other than tracking the software how many new users are gaming.

There were people all over this site claiming that Reach would move barely any hardware.  Its already provided a major jump and that is in EMEAA in America Halo and Xbox is a far stronger brand and will see a MAJOR increase.

Halo Reach is a massive hardware pusher.  This isn't up for debate.

Reach moved HW, no doubt about it, but to be fair I think when people talked about moving HW they were thinking new owners - i.e. the title would expand the Halo user base and with it the 360 install base.

With Halo Reach selling almost identically to Halo 3 the evidence strongly suggests the HW boost is mainly existing owners either buying Reach bundles or buying a 360s for Reach.

So, a nice HW boost for sure which MS will like, but going by the SW not that much of a growth in actual Halo install base so the HW boost should be both temporary and have little impact on forward SW - i.e. not that many new owners.

Still, a pretty decent boost nonetheless.  It's a pity there is no way to split the sales into regular and Reach edition consoles, though.

Looking elsewhere Wii continuing to dip slowly while PS3 gets a small boost from Move, which I didn't expect.  I figured with the September launch and fairly muted avertising in Europe it would sell mainly to existing owners - although I suppose it did, but I wasn't even expecting 15%.

I'll be curious to see how Kinect fares launching closer to the holiday season.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Around the Network

So much for the Move being in high demand.



Reasonable said:

Reach moved HW, no doubt about it, but to be fair I think when people talked about moving HW they were thinking new owners - i.e. the title would expand the Halo user base and with it the 360 install base.

With Halo Reach selling almost identically to Halo 3 the evidence strongly suggests the HW boost is mainly existing owners either buying Reach bundles or buying a 360s for Reach.

So, a nice HW boost for sure which MS will like, but going by the SW not that much of a growth in actual Halo install base so the HW boost should be both temporary and have little impact on forward SW - i.e. not that many new owners.

Still, a pretty decent boost nonetheless.  It's a pity there is no way to split the sales into regular and Reach edition consoles, though.

Looking elsewhere Wii continuing to dip slowly while PS3 gets a small boost from Move, which I didn't expect.  I figured with the September launch and fairly muted avertising in Europe it would sell mainly to existing owners - although I suppose it did, but I wasn't even expecting 15%.

I'll be curious to see how Kinect fares launching closer to the holiday season.


How does selling 50,000 more units on launch week = selling the same?



halo reach  great



Reasonable said:
BenVTrigger said:
steverhcp02 said:
BenVTrigger said:

Halo Reach is a JUGGERNAUT.  Major impact on hardware as I've been predicting for MONTHS even though people kept saying "Everyone who likes Halo already owns a 360.".

And PS3 above Wii 0_0

Nintendo is in trouble this holiday in regards to being a "dominant" system, especially with Kinect coming in November.


Actually i think people saying that have a more compelling argument as Reach only increased 50k over Halo 3.

If we had any idea of how many LE consoles sold or how many were produced for the region we could have a pretty good debate from both sides. But a few years after Halo 3 and a pretty even amount of Halo software i think its pretty safe to say the fanbase for Reach remained relatively flat all things considered.

Doesnt take anything away form the sales though. Its still ridiculous but anytime theres a LE bundle we have no idea other than tracking the software how many new users are gaming.

There were people all over this site claiming that Reach would move barely any hardware.  Its already provided a major jump and that is in EMEAA in America Halo and Xbox is a far stronger brand and will see a MAJOR increase.

Halo Reach is a massive hardware pusher.  This isn't up for debate.

Reach moved HW, no doubt about it, but to be fair I think when people talked about moving HW they were thinking new owners - i.e. the title would expand the Halo user base and with it the 360 install base.

With Halo Reach selling almost identically to Halo 3 the evidence strongly suggests the HW boost is mainly existing owners either buying Reach bundles or buying a 360s for Reach.

So, a nice HW boost for sure which MS will like, but going by the SW not that much of a growth in actual Halo install base so the HW boost should be both temporary and have little impact on forward SW - i.e. not that many new owners.

Still, a pretty decent boost nonetheless.  It's a pity there is no way to split the sales into regular and Reach edition consoles, though.

Looking elsewhere Wii continuing to dip slowly while PS3 gets a small boost from Move, which I didn't expect.  I figured with the September launch and fairly muted avertising in Europe it would sell mainly to existing owners - although I suppose it did, but I wasn't even expecting 15%.

I'll be curious to see how Kinect fares launching closer to the holiday season.

I stopped reading after that, that same stupid montra is getting really annoying. I bet people are gonna be spouting that BS 2 or 3 years from now.



Around the Network
BenVTrigger said:
steverhcp02 said:
BenVTrigger said:

Halo Reach is a JUGGERNAUT.  Major impact on hardware as I've been predicting for MONTHS even though people kept saying "Everyone who likes Halo already owns a 360.".

And PS3 above Wii 0_0

Nintendo is in trouble this holiday in regards to being a "dominant" system, especially with Kinect coming in November.


Actually i think people saying that have a more compelling argument as Reach only increased 50k over Halo 3.

If we had any idea of how many LE consoles sold or how many were produced for the region we could have a pretty good debate from both sides. But a few years after Halo 3 and a pretty even amount of Halo software i think its pretty safe to say the fanbase for Reach remained relatively flat all things considered.

Doesnt take anything away form the sales though. Its still ridiculous but anytime theres a LE bundle we have no idea other than tracking the software how many new users are gaming.

There were people all over this site claiming that Reach would move barely any hardware.  Its already provided a major jump and that is in EMEAA in America Halo and Xbox is a far stronger brand and will see a MAJOR increase.

Halo Reach is a massive hardware pusher.  This isn't up for debate.


While i cant speak for others i believe the general consensus was the boost would be dependent on available LE bundles.

Im simply of the belief that Halo is such a quality title that the sales from Halo 3 to Reach would not diminish based on quality like many sequals suffer from. Seeing as how it remained relatively flat software wise yet over the last 2 months oodles of 360's have been sold and a LE bundle is available im really thinking it isnt "moving hardware" in a sense making peopl ewho dont own a 360 go buy one, but rather the compelling new hardware combined with th eLE bundle to people who love all things Halo are more responsible than Halo itself.



Nsanity said:

So much for the Move being in high demand.

Well...

It did put PS3 ahead of the Wii.

So it could have been worse, and been in 3rd place



                            

BenVTrigger said:
Reasonable said:

Reach moved HW, no doubt about it, but to be fair I think when people talked about moving HW they were thinking new owners - i.e. the title would expand the Halo user base and with it the 360 install base.

With Halo Reach selling almost identically to Halo 3 the evidence strongly suggests the HW boost is mainly existing owners either buying Reach bundles or buying a 360s for Reach.

So, a nice HW boost for sure which MS will like, but going by the SW not that much of a growth in actual Halo install base so the HW boost should be both temporary and have little impact on forward SW - i.e. not that many new owners.

Still, a pretty decent boost nonetheless.  It's a pity there is no way to split the sales into regular and Reach edition consoles, though.

Looking elsewhere Wii continuing to dip slowly while PS3 gets a small boost from Move, which I didn't expect.  I figured with the September launch and fairly muted avertising in Europe it would sell mainly to existing owners - although I suppose it did, but I wasn't even expecting 15%.

I'll be curious to see how Kinect fares launching closer to the holiday season.


How does selling 50,000 more units on launch week = selling the same?


It's statistically the same.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
Jadedx said:
Reasonable said:
BenVTrigger said:
steverhcp02 said:
BenVTrigger said:

Halo Reach is a JUGGERNAUT.  Major impact on hardware as I've been predicting for MONTHS even though people kept saying "Everyone who likes Halo already owns a 360.".

And PS3 above Wii 0_0

Nintendo is in trouble this holiday in regards to being a "dominant" system, especially with Kinect coming in November.


Actually i think people saying that have a more compelling argument as Reach only increased 50k over Halo 3.

If we had any idea of how many LE consoles sold or how many were produced for the region we could have a pretty good debate from both sides. But a few years after Halo 3 and a pretty even amount of Halo software i think its pretty safe to say the fanbase for Reach remained relatively flat all things considered.

Doesnt take anything away form the sales though. Its still ridiculous but anytime theres a LE bundle we have no idea other than tracking the software how many new users are gaming.

There were people all over this site claiming that Reach would move barely any hardware.  Its already provided a major jump and that is in EMEAA in America Halo and Xbox is a far stronger brand and will see a MAJOR increase.

Halo Reach is a massive hardware pusher.  This isn't up for debate.

Reach moved HW, no doubt about it, but to be fair I think when people talked about moving HW they were thinking new owners - i.e. the title would expand the Halo user base and with it the 360 install base.

With Halo Reach selling almost identically to Halo 3 the evidence strongly suggests the HW boost is mainly existing owners either buying Reach bundles or buying a 360s for Reach.

So, a nice HW boost for sure which MS will like, but going by the SW not that much of a growth in actual Halo install base so the HW boost should be both temporary and have little impact on forward SW - i.e. not that many new owners.

Still, a pretty decent boost nonetheless.  It's a pity there is no way to split the sales into regular and Reach edition consoles, though.

Looking elsewhere Wii continuing to dip slowly while PS3 gets a small boost from Move, which I didn't expect.  I figured with the September launch and fairly muted avertising in Europe it would sell mainly to existing owners - although I suppose it did, but I wasn't even expecting 15%.

I'll be curious to see how Kinect fares launching closer to the holiday season.

I stopped reading after that, that same stupid montra is getting really annoying. I bet people are gonna be spouting that BS 2 or 3 years from now.

How else do you explain the 360 having moved millions of additional hardware between Halo 3 and Reach and an extra 50k this week, yet Reach is only up 50k from Halo 3?

Surely you cant believe people who bought Halo 3 and were avidly playing it online years after release dont want more Halo? Because i find that hard to believe considering how well it was received. So thus, id be compelled to say that the many millions of new xbox 360 oweners between Halo 3 and today and the 50k more consoles sold form last week are more to do with people who already had access to Halo 3 and a 360.

But thats my rational. Care to explain why you feel Halo 3 sales and Reach sales are different by 5% when the userbase has grown by leaps and bounds? Id argue, as i just did, that its because those users who bought Halo 3, bought Reach. And you?



Hopefully Move works out better for Sony in the long run. They did seem to have made a big deal out of it and are putting a lot of resources in it. Like all casual SW, FW means nothing, but...



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies