RolStoppable said:
Sony doesn't do amazing things first, that's why. Their games usually consist of ideas borrowed from somewhere else and mixed together. It's not surprising that Uncharted was compared to Tomb Raider and Gears of War a lot. Why did Gears of War do so much better? Because it redefined its genre and ever since then other TPS try to mimic its gameplay. God of War followed Devil May Cry. Killzone followed Halo.
Why didn't LittleBigPlanet or Heavy Rain become mega blockbusters? Because they are not amazing to most gamers. The thing that's new in LBP is the extensive level editor, but most gamers rather play than create, so they don't care. Heavy Rain is more of an interactive movie and that's only amazing to a small subset of gamers.
Of course, this explanation works in reverse as well and that's why Gran Turismo is so big while it's imitators never come close in sales. Forza would be the most popular one and hardly anyone remembers Konami's Enthusia Professional Racing anymore.
If you want to hit it big then you either have to do something first or something that hasn't been done in a long time by anyone else.
|
This had better be a joke.
It's not even remotely accurate in most accounts. Do you think that Gears of War was the first third person shooter? Or that Devil May Cry was the first 'slash em up' ? Killzone followed Halo but Halo followed a myriad of other games.
Gran Turismo certainly wasn't the first racing game.
Little Big Planet did sell well, but not spectacular. Yet NSMB Wii sold spectacular. Why? Little Big Planet had rights to the multi-player / platformer far before it did. Heavy Rain is a one of a kind type of gameplay experience.