Euphoria14 said:
Considering how most games these days are just the same old games from years past with flashier graphics and more content, I think we should just rate everything like crap. Man, now I really wonder how Uncharted 2 scored so high, or Galaxy 2, or even Fable, how about Smash Bros, or possibly even NSMBWii, that was only done 25 years ago right? How about we also go back in time and rate every single shooter like crap since it is just DOOM or Wolfenstein with flashy graphics and more content? Smash Bros came out on the N64, Gamerankings score of 78. Then Melee came out. It is Smash Bros with better graphics and more content. Gamerankings score of 90. Brawl came out, not a big difference graphically from Melee, but it adds content. Gamerankings score of 93. According to your logic Melee should have gotten a 6 and Brawl should have gotten a lot less than a 93. MKWii scored pretty well, but is it much different from the Mario Karts of old? Yeah you can say you get to use the Wiimote to control it like a steering wheel, but is that so much different from the numerous amount of games, such as Gran Turismo that have been played for a long time with actual steering wheels? You know, it probably should have scored a bit lower when you think about it...
Your argument is real bad superchunk. |
I think in some cases you have a point, but in others the sequels or later editions add tons of content and provide a wholly new experience. My point is none of these games provide a new experience. Just different graphics.















And not just on VGC, either. But that's okay, they finally, finally get to experience motion control gaming. Only took them 4 years. XD




