I see and agree about them overcomparing it to other games, as you pointed out other games do better at certain things because that's the actual genre they belong to and not a FPS.  

However the Heavenly Sword one is completely moot.  It has horrendous AI just like every hack and slash.  Stupid enemies that are just slashing fodder for your sword and stand around waiting to be hit.  Reach has fully calculating independent AI with no set scripted paths and the abilities to take cover and launch endless different strategies such as baiting and flanking maneuvers.  In fact its so advance at such a large scale that if 5 or more Jackels are in combat together they will band together and form a phalanx with their shields to cover other to fire over them.  That's some damn impressive AI and Bungie is well know for their AI capabilities.  

I think the racing part will become huge. Double team racing online. On 1000's of tracks created in Forge. Imagine one guy drives while the guy on the back uses weapons to take out other racers. Again with huge amounts of game modes withing just the racing part. It has so much potential for huge laughs online.

And the customization and level designing obviously refers to console. Not PC. Character customisation, game types customisation and the level design customisation in 3d is just rediculous. I dont know any other Console game with this many customisation options. None.

 With 60 AI on the screen this will serious limit the AI in any game. Total War series has hundreds of men yet there are more simplified by working in groups.

Nope Halo Reach's AI are better then Halo 3, and Halo 3's were top notch AI.

<table style="width: 90%;" border="0"><tr><td><strong>allblue said:</strong><br /><table style="width: 90%;" border="0"> <tbody><tr> <td><strong>Simulacrum said:</strong><br> <p>Please, som1 answer this:</p> <div><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: small;">You would think that a 50 GB disc will have large amount of game content due to the disk space for developers to play with.. why haven't we seen this yet? With Xbox 360 disc with around 9gb of space...How did Halo Reach fit that amount of content within a single disc...and having more content then Blu-Ray games to this date?</span></div> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p><br>That doesn't make a blue-ray anyless neccessary like the article is hinting towards. The reason the developer haven't strived for "this level of content" is because they see no reason to. This is a staple fact: "Quantity doesn't equal Quality".</p> <p>Remember blue-ray isn't just for games, if 1080p movies can be packed into 9gb why would the industry adopt Blue-ray and not HD-DVD?</p> <p>There are a lot of game which breaks the barrier 9 or even come close to 10 with 1/3 of the content Halo reach has.</p> <p>This <strong>doesn't make</strong> Halo Reach <strong>"The greatest game ever made"</strong> or even put other games to shame. Perhaps at this moment Halo Reach <strong>"might"</strong> push the standard for <strong>"FPS"</strong> games, but how long till the others developers catch up? Can you dispute that the other franchises with this amount of content isn't in development at this point of time?</p> <p>I'm sure Halo Reach is a great great great game but the only people who will take this article with more than a pinch of salt will be the <strong>Halo FANS</strong>. The rest, not very much so.</p> <p><img id="smallDivTip" style="z-index: 90; border: 0px solid blue; position: absolute; left: 63px; top: 333px;" src="chrome://dictionarytip/skin/dtipIconHover.png" alt=""></p></td></tr></table><br /><br />

Actually I was around for KZ2 days, that was a whole new level of overhypeness. Not saying Halo isn't overhyped, just saying the people here took KZ2 to a whole new level. 

Does Space Warfare better than Black Ops?

No shit, lol. Black Ops isn't Space Warfare.