By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Halo Reach Vs Killzone 3.

tuscaniman on 04 August 2010

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.



Around the Network
Jay520 on 04 August 2010
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.



M.U.G.E.N on 04 August 2010
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.

yep pretty much this...I think he mistook the 'cake' here
and also this

"The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach."

Sure :D



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

tuscaniman on 04 August 2010
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.


So now we are breaking down the FPS genre into what style of FPS they are? An FPS is an FPS and they can be compared. This argument began a long time ago and I seem to remember it was started when the original Killzone was dubbed the "Halo killer" and we all saw how that turned out. I bought that "Halo killer" for my PS2 and it was garbage. Reach and Killzone 3 can be compared and we know which game will win the comparison. Reach will have the higher meta and sell more. Anything else is Sony fanboy opinion vs 360 fanboy opinion which have to be thrown out.



M.U.G.E.N on 04 August 2010
tuscaniman said:
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.


So now we are breaking down the FPS genre into what style of FPS they are? An FPS is an FPS and they can be compared. This argument began a long time ago and I seem to remember it was started when the original Killzone was dubbed the "Halo killer" and we all saw how that turned out. I bought that "Halo killer" for my PS2 and it was garbage. Reach and Killzone 3 can be compared and we know which game will win the comparison. Reach will have the higher meta and sell more. Anything else is Sony fanboy opinion vs 360 fanboy opinion which have to be thrown out.

So going by that we can compare NFS to Forza :S

sureifyousayso.png



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!

Around the Network
tuscaniman on 04 August 2010
M.U.G.E.N said:
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.

yep pretty much this...I think he mistook the 'cake' here
and also this

"The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach."

Sure :D


Its guaranteed a bigger jump.

When Killzone 3 confirms split screen or Campaign 4 player Co-op get back to me. Its not even close. Compared to Reach Killzone 3 will be feature barren.



Hynad on 04 August 2010

@ M.U.G.E.N. :

Or compare Metroid Prime to Medal of Honor.

Or Bioshock to Unreal Tournament.



gamings_best on 04 August 2010
tuscaniman said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.

yep pretty much this...I think he mistook the 'cake' here
and also this

"The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach."

Sure :D


Its guaranteed a bigger jump.

When Killzone 3 confirms split screen or Campaign 4 player Co-op get back to me. Its not even close. Compared to Reach Killzone 3 will be feature barren.

lmao when Reach get fully modable player hoster dedicated servers, clan support, and 32 player online matches get back to me. and why does the co-op have to be campaign?  oh becasue you know killzone 3 will have co-op lol



Jay520 on 04 August 2010
tuscaniman said:
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.


So now we are breaking down the FPS genre into what style of FPS they are? An FPS is an FPS and they can be compared.

This argument began a long time ago and I seem to remember it was started when the original Killzone was dubbed the "Halo killer" and we all saw how that turned out. I bought that "Halo killer" for my PS2 and it was garbage.

Reach will have the higher meta and sell more. Anything else is Sony fanboy opinion vs 360 fanboy opinion which have to be thrown out.

Yes we are breaking down the FPS genre because they are different. They're different types of games. Burnout Paradise and Forza Motorsports are two racing games. That doesn't mean they can be compared. It's up to the person. If you like arcade madness and crashing other cars: get Burnout over Forza. If you want a racing simulator: get Forza over burnout. If you want an arcade shooter: get Halo. If you want a realistic shooter: get killzone.

Yeah, and Sony was an idiot for saying that.

Halo will probably sell more. it's possible that it'll get a higher meta, but nobody knows. 



tuscaniman on 04 August 2010
gamings_best said:
tuscaniman said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Jay520 said:
tuscaniman said:

Ok I know there are mostly Sony fans on this website but its getting pretty ridiculous. Sony fans you can't have your cake and eat it too. We've been hearing for many months how Forza 3 just doesn't compare to GT5. How GT5 is just going to crush it on features, gameplay, etc. Even though none of you have actually played GT5.

Now you come in here and you can honestly say that when it comes to Reach vs Killzone 3 we can't do a comparison because the games aren't out? When Halo:Reach had a playable beta that 3 million gamers have played?

Halo:Reach obviously will have more features, more involved gameplay, etc. If GT5 is better than Forza 3 for these exact  reasons than obviously Reach is better than Killzone 3 for these same reasons.

Halo:Reach is a major jump from Halo 3. Graphics are vastly improved, armor abilities have been added, new vehicles and weapons, the overall gameplay has changed from the way Halo used to be played. The game still has the Halo feel to it but if you played the beta you would understand just how different this game is than any other Halo.

When it comes to Killzone 3 we pretty much know what we are going to get. The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach. So pick your poison Sony fans. Is GT5 better than Forza 3 because of scale and gameplay, the same why Reach has a bigger scale and better gameplay than Killzone 3? Or are you going to stick by the "wait till the games release" comment and take back the GT5 praise.

Your missing the point. Killzone 3 is a realistic tactical shooter. Halo Reach is an arcade style. It's all preference. They can't be compared. Gran Turismo 5 is a relistic simulator. Forza is a relistic simulator. They can be compared.

yep pretty much this...I think he mistook the 'cake' here
and also this

"The jump from Killzone 2 to 3 will not be as big a jump from Halo 3 to Reach."

Sure :D


Its guaranteed a bigger jump.

When Killzone 3 confirms split screen or Campaign 4 player Co-op get back to me. Its not even close. Compared to Reach Killzone 3 will be feature barren.

lmao when Reach get fully modable player hoster dedicated servers, clan support, and 32 player online matches get back to me. and why does the co-op have to be campaign?  oh becasue you know killzone 3 will have co-op lol

Lmao when Killzone gets fully customizable maps (Forge 2.0), a theater mode,  a secondary multiplayer mode (firefight 2.0), 4-player split screen local campaign and mp play get back to me. You're not going to win this argument. Halo:Reach has multiple times more features.

P.S. What exactly do you mean by fully modable player host dedicated servers? Do you even know what a dedicated server is? A player hosted server is P2P. If by modding you mean selecting what level, gametype, weapons, etc than Halo does exactly this and more. Its called skulls.