By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - GT: Halo reach falling behind, Epic mickey needs work, SMG2/RED DEAD = GOTY

chocoloco on 27 July 2010
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.

I didn't say anything about K3's quality??? I just said Reach will have BOTH, I don't think K3 will have both, I think it will have Quality, but not quantity (in terms of sales) (and I expect Reach to get a higher meta)

L4D is a great franchise, and those have both sold around K3, I wouldn't be so sure it's the PS3 holding back Killzone and not the game/franchise itself ...

Some games do have less mass appeal so your example of L4D 1,2 makes sense.

In terms of meta score I often think the top franchises are overrated in order to not piss off the mass following they have. Look at GTA IV a great game, but certainly not worthy of its 98 meta. Halo is the same as nobody wanted to start a internet forum meltdown by giving the game a lower score. People would accuse the site of being biased. So what I'm saying is Killzone does not benifit from the massive following so it is bound to have a lower meta score.

That's entirely your opinion.

Never heard of that excuse before, you hear something new and barmy everyday ^^

Bro of course its an opinion, isn't that what forums are?



Around the Network
Seece on 27 July 2010
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.

I didn't say anything about K3's quality??? I just said Reach will have BOTH, I don't think K3 will have both, I think it will have Quality, but not quantity (in terms of sales) (and I expect Reach to get a higher meta)

L4D is a great franchise, and those have both sold around K3, I wouldn't be so sure it's the PS3 holding back Killzone and not the game/franchise itself ...

Some games do have less mass appeal so your example of L4D 1,2 makes sense.

In terms of meta score I often think the top franchises are overrated in order to not piss off the mass following they have. Look at GTA IV a great game, but certainly not worthy of its 98 meta. Halo is the same as nobody wanted to start a internet forum meltdown by giving the game a lower score. People would accuse the site of being biased. So what I'm saying is Killzone does not benifit from the massive following so it is bound to have a lower meta score.

That's entirely your opinion.

Never heard of that excuse before, you hear something new and barmy everyday ^^

Bro of course its an opinion, isn't that what forums are?

You're 100% right, should of said wishful thinking



 

kiefer23 on 27 July 2010
Torillian said:
kiefer23 said:
Torillian said:
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Wanna make an avatar/sig bet out of that prediction?  I'd love to see you with a funny avatar for a month or two.

Yeah he would definetely lose if he betted on that.


yeah, it has nothing to do with a love or hate of Halo but just the realization that no game has done that ever.  I would really love if he stood by such a ludicrous statement.  Hell I'll even be nice and say that if Halo wins less than 50% I win, if it wins more than 80% he'll win, and if it's between we'll just call it a draw.  3 month avatar/sig bet.


Yeah, Halo Reach or any other game EVER will never have more than 80% of GOY rewards. There are thousands of websites/magazines out there with their own GOY. Many exclusive to one console and there are millions that love to hate Halo.

I doubt it'll even reach 10% (no pun intended) but it may score GOY with the wildly popular websites and magazines that people recognize and listen too.



Mr Khan on 27 July 2010
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Absolutely impossible. No one game will get across more than 20% of sites, there are far too many different value metrics that will apply to the GotY contenders this year.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

selnor on 27 July 2010
Mr Khan said:
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Absolutely impossible. No one game will get across more than 20% of sites, there are far too many different value metrics that will apply to the GotY contenders this year.


Oh come on guys, I was splitting hairs. 

Of course I was exagerating, on purpose.

My point is, Killzone has never been a Halo both in game and sales. KZ2 didnt change that. All of a sudden people think theres an answer to Bungies masterpiece? It's ludicrous. 

Yes the game may be good. But not Halo. Reach looks phenominal. I know that styles can vary, but even so Halo is a game like no other. KZ is similar to alot of FPS's. And always will be. 

Halo cant be touched on what it achieves.



Around the Network
Hynad on 27 July 2010

Selnor confirms it.

 

Halo is the most overhyped game series ever.  Nothing can ever touch it.

 

Ever.

 

 

*sigh ¬_¬

 

 

Funny he'd say all this about Halo being so great and different from any others.  I played the games, and always felt like I was playing an other generic FPS.  To each their own, I guess.



Jay520 on 27 July 2010
selnor said:
Mr Khan said:
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Absolutely impossible. No one game will get across more than 20% of sites, there are far too many different value metrics that will apply to the GotY contenders this year.


Oh come on guys, I was splitting hairs. 

Of course I was exagerating, on purpose.

My point is, Killzone has never been a Halo both in game and sales. KZ2 didnt change that. All of a sudden people think theres an answer to Bungies masterpiece? It's ludicrous. 

Yes the game may be good. But not Halo. Reach looks phenominal. I know that styles can vary, but even so Halo is a game like no other. KZ is similar to alot of FPS's. And always will be. 

Halo cant be touched on what it achieves.

I believe Halo is similar to Unreal Tournament. I'm not too sure though.



XxXProphecyXxX on 28 July 2010
Hynad said:

Selnor confirms it.

 

Halo is the most overhyped game series ever.  Nothing can ever touch it.

 

Ever.

 

 

*sigh ¬_¬

 

 

Funny he'd say all this about Halo being so great and different from any others.  I played the games, and always felt like I was playing an other generic FPS.  To each their own, I guess.

LOL it's Alan wake all over again!!! "Best game evah!!"  "AAA confirmed no ps3 exclusive can touch it!!"

we all know how that turned out ROFL!!! ohh well he does it with every xbox exclusive so are you guys really surprised?

 

Anyway notice how they like to use  SALES to argue about Halo >>>>>> KZ or what ever FPS?

But then when ppl talk about  GT5 being so much better than their precious Forza with the SALES argument suddenly they flip flop and refuse to accept the SALES TALK? ROFL!!!!!!!!!



XxXProphecyXxX on 28 July 2010
Hynad said:

Selnor confirms it.

 

Halo is the most overhyped game series ever.  Nothing can ever touch it.

 

Ever.

 

 

*sigh ¬_¬

 

 

Funny he'd say all this about Halo being so great and different from any others.  I played the games, and always felt like I was playing an other generic FPS.  To each their own, I guess.

Double post*



leatherhat on 28 July 2010
selnor said:
Mr Khan said:
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Absolutely impossible. No one game will get across more than 20% of sites, there are far too many different value metrics that will apply to the GotY contenders this year.


Oh come on guys, I was splitting hairs. 

Of course I was exagerating, on purpose.

My point is, Killzone has never been a Halo both in game and sales. KZ2 didnt change that. All of a sudden people think theres an answer to Bungies masterpiece? It's ludicrous. 

Yes the game may be good. But not Halo. Reach looks phenominal. I know that styles can vary, but even so Halo is a game like no other. KZ is similar to alot of FPS's. And always will be. 

Halo cant be touched on what it achieves.


Not trying to be that PC elitest guy, but if you really want to play some good shooters you need to get off consoles and go play some PC games. If you are honestly excited for halo forge stuff then your mind will be blow by what can be done on PC.



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype