By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - GT: Halo reach falling behind, Epic mickey needs work, SMG2/RED DEAD = GOTY

Linkasf on 27 July 2010

My game of the Year is Monster hunter 3. I cant put that game down at all. 310 hours and still counting.



Around the Network
Torillian on 27 July 2010
kiefer23 said:
Torillian said:
selnor said:

ROFL. Reach not only eats Killzone in terms of features and content, but sheer playable scale to. 

I predict Reach will be GOTY on more than 80% of the review sites. 

Killzone 3 better than Reach. Oh wait England won the world cup.


Wanna make an avatar/sig bet out of that prediction?  I'd love to see you with a funny avatar for a month or two.

Yeah he would definetely lose if he betted on that.


yeah, it has nothing to do with a love or hate of Halo but just the realization that no game has done that ever.  I would really love if he stood by such a ludicrous statement.  Hell I'll even be nice and say that if Halo wins less than 50% I win, if it wins more than 80% he'll win, and if it's between we'll just call it a draw.  3 month avatar/sig bet.



...

JPH85 on 27 July 2010
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:
Seece said:
Smeags said:
Wagram said:
JPH85 said:

Let's say Halo Reach is by far the WORST video game every created by man. It deserves a score of -3/10 (that's a negative 3), and Killzone 3 deserves a 20/10. Still Halo Reach will sell 4 times at least MORE than Killzone 3, and will be played a 300 times more than Killzone 3, and gamers will praise it more than Killzone 3. So sucks for Killzone 3.

Quality > Quantity


Luckily they're both going to be quality games.

Indeed, Reach will have Quality AND Quantity


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

If it's in terms of quantity, then not so much. I bet Killzone 3 will sell less than 3 million WW (I mean check the sales of Killzone 2), while Halo Reach will surpass the 8 million mark WW. Actually, I would bet that Halo Reach will sell more than 3 million day 1.



chocoloco on 27 July 2010

Wtf that post f'd up



chocoloco on 27 July 2010
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:
Seece said:
Smeags said:
Wagram said:
JPH85 said:

Let's say Halo Reach is by far the WORST video game every created by man. It deserves a score of -3/10 (that's a negative 3), and Killzone 3 deserves a 20/10. Still Halo Reach will sell 4 times at least MORE than Killzone 3, and will be played a 300 times more than Killzone 3, and gamers will praise it more than Killzone 3. So sucks for Killzone 3.

Quality > Quantity


Luckily they're both going to be quality games.

Indeed, Reach will have Quality AND Quantity


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.



Around the Network
Seece on 27 July 2010
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.



 

chocoloco on 27 July 2010
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.



Seece on 27 July 2010
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.

I didn't say anything about K3's quality??? I just said Reach will have BOTH, I don't think K3 will have both, I think it will have Quality, but not quantity (in terms of sales) (and I expect Reach to get a higher meta)

L4D is a great franchise, and those have both sold around K3, I wouldn't be so sure it's the PS3 holding back Killzone and not the game/franchise itself ...



 

chocoloco on 27 July 2010
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.

I didn't say anything about K3's quality??? I just said Reach will have BOTH, I don't think K3 will have both, I think it will have Quality, but not quantity (in terms of sales) (and I expect Reach to get a higher meta)

L4D is a great franchise, and those have both sold around K3, I wouldn't be so sure it's the PS3 holding back Killzone and not the game/franchise itself ...

Some games do have less mass appeal so your example of L4D 1,2 makes sense.

In terms of meta score I often think the top franchises are overrated in order to not piss off the mass following they have. Look at GTA IV a great game, but certainly not worthy of its 98 meta. Halo is the same as nobody wanted to start a internet forum meltdown by giving the game a lower score. People would accuse the site of being biased. So what I'm saying is Killzone does not benifit from the massive following so it is bound to have a lower meta score.



Seece on 27 July 2010
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
chocoloco said:
Seece said:
Tigerlure said:


And Killzone 3 won't?

In terms of what?

Don't worry we all know Seece only likes Microsoft games, but most people who are fans of first person shooters would play both Halo:Reach and Killzone 3 if they had both systems.

Quality and Quantity will be in both games.

? I like LBP and a few PC games, and a few DS and PSP games ta.

I was talking about Quantity, and the sales comparison.

I think you confussed more than one person, but yes quanity in sales will topple anything from Sony.

You should realize that killzone would sell tons better if it was a 360 exclusive and any fps fan who owns the system would brag about its graphics and great classes. My main point is why act like there is a differance in quality just because one game sells more than another. Thats like saying McDonalds is better than a five star restaurant. Sometimes sales do not equal quality, don't get me wrong though as I love Halo.

I didn't say anything about K3's quality??? I just said Reach will have BOTH, I don't think K3 will have both, I think it will have Quality, but not quantity (in terms of sales) (and I expect Reach to get a higher meta)

L4D is a great franchise, and those have both sold around K3, I wouldn't be so sure it's the PS3 holding back Killzone and not the game/franchise itself ...

Some games do have less mass appeal so your example of L4D 1,2 makes sense.

In terms of meta score I often think the top franchises are overrated in order to not piss off the mass following they have. Look at GTA IV a great game, but certainly not worthy of its 98 meta. Halo is the same as nobody wanted to start a internet forum meltdown by giving the game a lower score. People would accuse the site of being biased. So what I'm saying is Killzone does not benifit from the massive following so it is bound to have a lower meta score.

That's entirely your opinion.

Never heard of that excuse before, you hear something new and barmy everyday ^^