I wouldn't hold my breath.

Well you shouldn't, it ain't gonna happen in our lifetime, that's for sure.

Ehm, why not? Before births and deaths were kept by churches, now it's governments that handle that (well, I think in most do, not sure if all of them) and you wouldn't dare to associate it with religion, why can't the same happen to marriage in the future?

Maybe it could happen, but I doubt either of us would live to see that.

I swear I posted this exact thing earlier in the thread. Did you copy and paste my much earlier post?

Nah, I just didn't feel like reading hundreds of paragraphs of mind-numbing jibber jabber.

Actually, the repetition all seems to be on one side. Several things have been given to you, known facts, if you will (homophobia =/= heterosexual, homosexual acts in other primates, ancient Greek culture, non-Christian societies, etc), yet you are the one who keeps saying, unsubstanciatively, that it is genetic to repel at the idea of a homosexual act. So, if this is so genetic, where's the proof? And what is it that makes people gay? I'm glad to see that you've not tried denying that they exist, but if it were truely genetic, then wouldn't this "repulsive gene" have taken over by now, through natural selection?

As for the other assertions you make, I can also say that those are a load of bull. My mother has a fear of snakes, why don't I? If a fear of heights was genetic, why was I able to get over mine? And where's my fear of the dark, something I actually revel in? These that you mention are learned traits, not anything to do with genetics.

Yeah, many people cringe even from just watching a snake on TV.

Monkeys are programmed to fear snakes, so why wouldn't we be?

"The classic and best experiment in this is Susan Mineka's work with a group of monkeys in Madison in the '80s, where she set out to examine the ontogeny of an instinct—in this care fear of snakes. Wild-born monkeys are afraid of snakes. They're so scared of snakes that they will cower in the back of the cage screaming rather than reach across a plastic model snake to get at a peanut when they're very hungry. Captive-born monkeys are not afraid of snakes; they happily reach across the model snake to get at a peanut. So what's going on here? That means that fear of snakes must be learned. But how on earth do you learn fear of snakes? The conventional classical conditioning wouldn't work very well, would it, because either you have a bad experience with a snake to learn from, in which case you're dead, or you don't have a bad experience, in which case you don't learn that snakes are frightening. So how are you going to end up acquiring a fear of snakes? It seems an absurd thing to acquire. She argues that what's happening is that there is a program for fear of snakes, an instinct if you like, but that that instinct needs to be socially triggered—in some sense triggered by a vicarious experience, by observing another monkey having a fear of snakes. So she set up an experiment in which she videotaped the wild-born monkey reacting with fear to a snake, and she then showed this video to a captive-born monkey, which immediately acquired a fear of snakes and was not then prepared to reach across even a model snake to get a peanut. She now doctors the video, so that it has the same monkey reacting in the same way in the background, but the bottom half of the screen now instead of having a snake has a flower. Again, the captive-born monkey has never seen a flower, so after it sees a monkey reacting with extreme fear to this new thing called a flower it should just as easily learn a fear of flowers. But it doesn't. It just learns that some monkeys are crazy. So what's going on here is that there is clearly an instinct for fear of snakes, and that's not surprising. Human beings have snake phobia. It's the commonest of all the phobias, even though most of us hardly even ever see a snake in our lives, but it requires an input from the environment. It requires a nurture input to be triggered. We know this is happening in the amygdala, and we're getting a bit of a handle on which cells are involved. We're not yet down to the gene level, but I'd bet my bottom dollar there's going to be a little pathway of genes in here that's mediating this process."

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ridley03/ridley_index.html

So strange in fact...Homosexualty is not only something for humans..Many mammas have homosexual euhm activities still their is only one kind of mammal where they have found homophobia.....Sad isn't it?